The Tiger Woods saga

[GBO18]

It's a really big deal to me, but maybe not to everyone.

Are you 60+?

 

[95 Vol Alum]

Not that it's really a big deal nowadays.


(not saying it's not wrong)

It is if you're the one involved. It does speak significantly to your character, imo.

 

[YankeeVol]

It is if you're the one involved. It does speak significantly to your character, imo.

I would agree, but in the grand scheme of things it really doesn't change much for those type of people.

 

[1972 Grad]

Are you 60+?

Add it up. The name is 1972 Grad.....that was 43 years ago. Maybe it's just me, but when I make a promise, I keep it.

 

[volfanbill]

I'm 34 and adultery is a pretty big freaking deal to me

 

[1972 Grad]

I'm 34 and adultery is a pretty big freaking deal to me

Good for you!

 

[1972 Grad]

Not that it's really a big deal nowadays.


(not saying it's not wrong)

I find it extremely sad what all isn't a big deal anymore.

 

[YankeeVol]

I find it extremely sad what all isn't a big deal anymore.

There's a lot more things out there that are far more sad than adultry.

Again, I am not condoning the behavior.

 

[doozer]

Other people's marriages are their business, not mine. I could not care less what kind of arrangement or relationship they have with each other.

 

[1972 Grad]

There's a lot more things out there that are far more sad than adultry.

Again, I am not condoning the behavior.

I am going to go out on a limb here, and guess that if YOU were Jason Dufner, and YOU were in love with your wife , who was your college sweetheart, that there wouldn't be "a lot more things out there that are far more sad than adultery" when YOU found it out.

 

[1972 Grad]

Other people's marriages are their business, not mine. I could not care less what kind of arrangement or relationship they have with each other.

My guess is that their "arrangement" didn't include what happened, or two relationships wouldn't have ended so abruptly.

 

[SDV]

Not that it's really a big deal nowadays.


(not saying it's not wrong)

Wtf are you talking about?

 

[doozer]

My guess is that their "arrangement" didn't include what happened, or two relationships wouldn't have ended so abruptly.

I don't guess because I don't comment on other people's relationships because it's none of my business.

 

[1972 Grad]

I don't guess because I don't comment on other people's relationships because it's none of my business.

I think that you already have commented on it, and that is why I responded.

 

[1972 Grad]

When Tiger turned 22 at the end of 1997, he had 2 majors and 6 wins. Spieth has 2 wins and 1 second place in a major so far. There are 3 more majors and 19 tournaments to play in before Spieth turns 22 on July 27 this year. He may or may not achieve Woods' records, but it appears that he could certainly provide plenty of competition for McIlroy, Watson, etc., which is the question that I answered.

I posted the above April 4, when comparing Spieth to Tiger. Spieth now has 5 wins and 2 majors with 1 more major and 2 tournaments to play in before he turns 22.

 

[volfanbill]

I posted the above April 4, when comparing Spieth to Tiger. Spieth now has 5 wins and 2 majors with 1 more major and 2 tournaments to play in before he turns 22.

You can quit doing this every time Spieth wins. I beat you to the comment for starters and haven't said a word. Everyone gets it, Spieth is good. Remember when Tiger was good at 22 and had a squeaky clean image? Let it go bro, let it go.

 

[volfanbill]

.

 

[1972 Grad]

You can quit doing this every time Spieth wins. I beat you to the comment for starters and haven't said a word. Everyone gets it, Spieth is good. Remember when Tiger was good at 22 and had a squeaky clean image? Let it go bro, let it go.

Tiger who?

 

[vol_in_ar]

the man that's 40/1 to win the british...I'm hitting the Sports book at Caesar's today

 

[volfanbill]

Tiger who?

The man you are specifically comparing Spieth to.

Tiger, the single greatest player the game has ever seen, regardless of Major count or overall wins. No one is as good as Tiger was in his prime regardless of your ridiculous bias.

 

[MphsBlues]

the man that's 40/1 to win the british...I'm hitting the Sports book at Caesar's today

Fore, right!

 

[1972 Grad]

The man you are specifically comparing Spieth to.

Tiger, the single greatest player the game has ever seen, regardless of Major count or overall wins. No one is as good as Tiger was in his prime regardless of your ridiculous bias.

My only bias is that he is a prick. I hope that he misses the cut.

 

[volfanbill]

My only bias is that he is a prick. I hope that he misses the cut.

Yea, we get it. It's a "gentlemen's game" despite the fact that extremely few of the all time greats in the game were actually gentlemen. You're lost in the sauce, so I'm done here.

 

[GAVol]

the man that's 40/1 to win the british...I'm hitting the Sports book at Caesar's today

I don't think I'd even be slightly surprised if he won it.

 

[1972 Grad]

Yea, we get it. It's a "gentlemen's game" despite the fact that extremely few of the all time greats in the game were actually gentlemen. You're lost in the sauce, so I'm done here.

Whatever you say, but I have personally met several of the "all time greats," and even played a round with one, and I respectfully disagree with your assessment.