Going to do a Warrior Dash soon.
Sounds miserable. I ran 5 miles once. I'd much rather kill myself running a 6' mile than run 5 miles slow. Good luck and go hard.
Sounds miserable. I ran 5 miles once. I'd much rather kill myself running a 6' mile than run 5 miles slow. Good luck and go hard.
I read a study, or rather read about a study this past week that determined that HIIT and short, quick cardio sessions were much healthier than distance training (talking like marathon distances).
Maybe some of you saw it. It found that people that didn't do any cardio at all were healthier than marathoners. Of course I didn't read it in detail, so it could be really flawed conclusions. I have run one half-marathon, but I prefer running shorter races. I'm going to try to increase my cardio when it warms up a bit.
I just can't see how it can be good on your joints to log that many miles. My brother-in-law is an excellent marathon runner. He's done 2:50, and probably a dozen sub-3 marathons. He finished in the top 10 of a 50 mile trail run on Saturday. I can't see how his knees and ankles won't come back with a vengance in 20 years.
Run it early. I did one in Lexington, and so we got an early afternoon wave since it's a 3 hour drive. The course was wrecked, and if you're competitive, it will definitely affect your time.
I still finished in the top 20% or so, but there were parts of the course that you couldn't even walk, much less run. I definitely fell on my ass 10 or 15 times and had a sore tailbone.
I actually ran a 5k in Knoxville that morning and then rode to Lexington for the Warrior Dash.
It was a lot of fun, though! I highly recommend it.
The surprising part was that this dealt with cardio health, not musculoskeletal health. Something to do with the fact that your body quickly gets acclimated to distance running and it doesn't shock the cardio system enough to be beneficial. Like I said, it could be BS that gets shot down like many studies. But if it's true, it's definitely counter-intuitive.