The winner of the Iowa caucus: Trump

#126
#126
luthervol said:
Sounds like there were major glitches in the system and rather than force out some unverified results, they are willing to take the public shaming in order to make sure they get it correct.
Click to expand...

Speaking truth to power is always hard to do. Especially when your own party is corrupt.
 
#127
#127
InVOLuntary said:
Maybe the dems should have consulted with the Obama care organizers to insure this thing went off like a Swiss watch.
Click to expand...

Lol.....Some lame brain picked some kicked to the curb Hillary staffers to f*** this up in a major way. Who would've seen this disaster coming?
 
#128
#128
luthervol said:
Over the look of Trump refusing to let any challenger on any ballot because he knows that the anybody but Trump vote would make him look horrible? Sure I would.
Click to expand...

WTH are you talking about numbskull? Anybody but Trump vote will make him look horrible? Do you even have a name at all that this anybody but Trump challenger would destroy the President? I don't see anyone who has stepped forward that's qualified enough to shine Trump's shoes yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Al Orange
#129
#129
luthervol said:
Over the look of Trump refusing to let any challenger on any ballot because he knows that the anybody but Trump vote would make him look horrible? Sure I would.
Click to expand...
Are you claiming Trump is in someway preventing people from running against him in the primary? I may be confused but it reads that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#130
#130
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#132
#132
#134
#134
This mess in Iowa, just shows that the caucus is antiquated and needs to be done away with. For those of you saying that Iowa is important? You probably don't remember who won the Iowa caucuses in 1992 (it wasn't Bill Clinton) ... or that Marco Rubio received just as many delegates in Iowa as Trump did in 2016. New Hampshire and South Carolina are much more important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#137
#137
BowlBrother85 said:
This mess in Iowa, just shows that the caucus is antiquated and needs to be done away with. For those of you saying that Iowa is important? You probably don't remember who won the Iowa caucuses in 1992 (it wasn't Bill Clinton) ... or that Marco Rubio received just as many delegates in Iowa as Trump did in 2016. New Hampshire and South Carolina are much more important.
Click to expand...
I agree 100%. A rotating regional caucus or even a national caucus would be better.
 
#138
#138
BowlBrother85 said:
This mess in Iowa, just shows that the caucus is antiquated and needs to be done away with. For those of you saying that Iowa is important? You probably don't remember who won the Iowa caucuses in 1992 (it wasn't Bill Clinton) ... or that Marco Rubio received just as many delegates in Iowa as Trump did in 2016. New Hampshire and South Carolina are much more important.
Click to expand...

Seemingly been going on for a long time, and no problems until, last night.

And, last election shows, they are all important.
 
#139
#139
C-south said:
And they all would’ve ended up just like Iowa’s which wasn’t a complete f****** clown show like the dims put on.
Click to expand...
I guess it's true that the best way to avoid election issues is to have no contested elections. Trump may be on to something.
 
#144
#144
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Also the party that wants to have government run healthcare w/open borders & w/student loan forgiveness.
Click to expand...
Which begs the following questions for me: How do these people in favor of loan forgiveness think that the banks that loaned the money get repaid? Do the colleges give the banks their money back and lose a trillion dollars, or do the banks not get repaid and lose over a trillion dollars, or do the people get stuck with the bill for it all? That is, raise that trillion by taxing the hell out of people, giving that money back to the banks, and that makes everybody whole in their minds?
 
#145
#145
1972 Grad said:
Which begs the following questions for me: How do these people in favor of loan forgiveness think that the banks that loaned the money get repaid? Do the colleges give the banks their money back and lose a trillion dollars, or do the banks not get repaid and lose over a trillion dollars, or do the people get stuck with the bill for it all? That is, raise that trillion by taxing the hell out of people, giving that money back to the banks, and that makes everybody whole in their minds?
Click to expand...

BB85 will be along here shortly & will answer/explain all the question you may have. He's the stable genius here.
 
#146
#146
luthervol said:
Yes. That is what I am claiming.
Michigan Republicans want Trump to run uncontested in 2020 primary
GOP Trump challengers slam canceled primaries - CNNPolitics
Republicans to scrap primaries and caucuses as Trump challengers cry foul
'Cowards run from fights': 3 Republican presidential candidates join forces to blast Trump 'loyalists' for shutting them out of primaries
Click to expand...
LOL at your links, man.

Link 1 is about Michigan...even though there are Rs currently running against Trump.
Links 2-4 is about South Carolina, Kansas, Nevada, and Arizona. It's the same story carried by 3 different news sites.

None of them have to do with Iowa. The 3 sites with the same story even say that the practice is common for Rs and Ds.

And, I read a little further, the State Party leaders are discussing cancelling the primaries; not Trump.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#150
#150
C-south said:
Maybe they didn’t poll high enough or rake in enough cash. Isn’t that how the dims booted the blacks and Asian?
Click to expand...
No, the Democrats had thresholds to meet in order to be a part of the debates, but they haven't tried to keep anyone off the ballot.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top