The winner of the Iowa caucus: Trump

[luthervol]

It's never too late.

Tell that to the dead dog in the street as you're closing his gate.

 

[McDad]

You can't honestly believe that the state republican party officials act in a vacuum.
If a candidate runs unopposed, holding the primary is ludicrous and it should be cancelled.
If a candidate has "legitimate" opposition, not allowing them in the primary is cowardly and unfair to the public.
Obviously, it all boils down to what is considered "legitimate".
Ex governors instantly have legitimate credibility. Ex congressmen do as well, but possibly to a lesser degree (depending).
The three attempting to run against Trump were immediately cut off at the knees. As Trump wished and with full complicity from the republican party.

You're asserting Trump (and/or his people) is behind the state party leader's decision. Again, it is odd Trump's name is in those headlines you posted and in the article as an object of blame. Yet none of the articles allude to his campaign influencing the states' leaders. Seems to me if there was proof or a reasonable assumption to be made the authors of those articles would have made it. Perhaps it happened with the campaigns of Clinton and Obama and now you're assuming it happened with Trump?

 

[37L1]

Tell that to the dead dog in the street as your closing his gate.

*you're

So your post is a dead dog? Noticed the similarity.

 

[luthervol]

You're asserting Trump (and/or his people) is behind the state party leader's decision. Again, it is odd Trump's name is in those headlines you posted and in the article as an object of blame. Yet none of the articles allude to his campaign influencing the states' leaders. Seems to me if there was proof or a reasonable assumption to be made the authors of those articles would have made it. Perhaps it happened with the campaigns of Clinton and Obama and now you're assuming it happened with Trump?

Well I guess they operate under the "some things are self evident" theory.
If the same thing happened during the Clinton or Obama campaigns, it didn't show up in my "Trump opposition in 2020 republican primary" google search.
What I took away from the articles, once I actually read them, was that there were legitimate candidates wishing to challenge Trump that were thwarted by the republican party. That aligned nicely with my memories of earlier reports stating that Trump would run unopposed even though there were legitimate candidates wishing to oppose him. I remember those reports better than I remember most things because I had clung to the hope that the saner side of the republican party (yes I made the assumption that there actually was one) would attempt to pull the party back out of Trump's arse. Optimistically naive.

 

[0nelilreb]

Well I guess they operate under the "some things are self evident" theory.
If the same thing happened during the Clinton or Obama campaigns, it didn't show up in my "Trump opposition in 2020 republican primary" google search.
What I took away from the articles, once I actually read them, was that there were legitimate candidates wishing to challenge Trump that were thwarted by the republican party. That aligned nicely with my memories of earlier reports stating that Trump would run unopposed even though there were legitimate candidates wishing to oppose him. I remember those reports better than I remember most things because I had clung to the hope that the saner side of the republican party (yes I made the assumption that there actually was one) would attempt to pull the party back out of Trump's arse. Optimistically naive.

I find it odd that you are hoping for the “ saner Republicans show up “ while the left keeps going further and further left . It’s almost like you had a plan in mind . Lol

 

[n_huffhines]

Both sides are involved in some shady practices right now. Regardless if Trump is pushing it or not, the idea that opponents aren't even acknowledged in certain states is a fkn indictment against R's. Point fingers all you want, red hats. You're two sides of the same corrupt coin.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Well I guess they operate under the "some things are self evident" theory.
If the same thing happened during the Clinton or Obama campaigns, it didn't show up in my "Trump opposition in 2020 republican primary" google search.
What I took away from the articles, once I actually read them, was that there were legitimate candidates wishing to challenge Trump that were thwarted by the republican party. That aligned nicely with my memories of earlier reports stating that Trump would run unopposed even though there were legitimate candidates wishing to oppose him. I remember those reports better than I remember most things because I had clung to the hope that the saner side of the republican party (yes I made the assumption that there actually was one) would attempt to pull the party back out of Trump's arse. Optimistically naive.

Lol.

I pity you.









Not really.

 

[n_huffhines]

View attachment 258792

Too good

 

[C-south]

Both sides are involved in some shady practices right now. Regardless if Trump is pushing it or not, the idea that opponents aren't even acknowledged in certain states is a fkn indictment against R's. Point fingers all you want, red hats. You're two sides of the same corrupt coin.

 

[happy-go_vol]

I find it odd that you are hoping for the “ saner Republicans show up “ while the lefts keeps going further and further left . It’s almost like you had a plan in mind . Lol

Thats funny "saner Republicans." my goodness the marxist has kicked out all sane dems. They've been kicked out for for years. Poor ol luther he needs to look at his party 1st when he talks about sane.

Of course luther's definition of sane is probably right inline with the Sanders, Antifas and the black panther parties of the world. He declare trymp is insane yet look at the marxist base. Comedy luther.

 

[McDad]

Both sides are involved in some shady practices right now. Regardless if Trump is pushing it or not, the idea that opponents aren't even acknowledged in certain states is a fkn indictment against R's. Point fingers all you want, red hats. You're two sides of the same corrupt coin.

I think it is an indictment of both parties since both have a history of squashing challengers to an incumbent POTUS campaign.
Not sure it matters much anyway. There is no knight in shining armor riding in to save the republic.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Lol I love this

Iowa woman finds out Pete Buttigieg is gay, asks for caucus card back

 

[volfanjustin]

Lol I love this

Iowa woman finds out Pete Buttigieg is gay, asks for caucus card back

Dems are racists and homophobic. Can you imagine if a Trump supporter was on video saying that?

 

[1972 Grad]

Dems are racists and homophobic. Can you imagine if a Trump supporter was on video saying that?

It would be on a continuous loop on television.

 

[volfanjustin]

Last week Trump supporters all are dumb clueless rednecks according to CNN, today the socialists can’t run a 170,00 voter caucus. How the tables have turned

 

[ETV]

Lol I love this

Iowa woman finds out Pete Buttigieg is gay, asks for caucus card back

Was she denied voting privileges and identified as a homophobe?

 

[FLVOL_79]

Was she denied voting privileges and identified as a homophobe?

Nope. Not sure what happened. I can only watch so much low IQ liberal hypocrisy before I turn it off. Its why I dont watch MSNBC.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Last week Trump supporters all are dumb clueless rednecks according to CNN, today the socialists can’t run a 170,00 voter caucus. How the tables have turned

And they dont know the guy they are voting for is gay but it might be ok if he reads about Jesus..

 

[Orange_Crush]

You can't honestly believe that the state republican party officials act in a vacuum.
If a candidate runs unopposed, holding the primary is ludicrous and it should be cancelled.
If a candidate has "legitimate" opposition, not allowing them in the primary is cowardly and unfair to the public.
Obviously, it all boils down to what is considered "legitimate".
Ex governors instantly have legitimate credibility. Ex congressmen do as well, but possibly to a lesser degree (depending).
The three attempting to run against Trump were immediately cut off at the knees. As Trump wished and with full complicity from the republican party.

Can source that last sentence? All I see is your conjecture which started with "You can't honestly believe..."

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Democrats don't actually count votes they just assume they win elections and there's no further discussion.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Well I guess they operate under the "some things are self evident" theory.
If the same thing happened during the Clinton or Obama campaigns, it didn't show up in my "Trump opposition in 2020 republican primary" google search.
What I took away from the articles, once I actually read them, was that there were legitimate candidates wishing to challenge Trump that were thwarted by the republican party. That aligned nicely with my memories of earlier reports stating that Trump would run unopposed even though there were legitimate candidates wishing to oppose him. I remember those reports better than I remember most things because I had clung to the hope that the saner side of the republican party (yes I made the assumption that there actually was one) would attempt to pull the party back out of Trump's arse. Optimistically naive.

One major problem with this "self-evidence" as a source is the "self" proposing it.

 

[McDad]

Perhaps Democrats need to ask for ID from caucus members before allowing them to vote?

 

[Orange_Crush]

Perhaps Democrats need to ask for ID from caucus members before allowing them to vote?

You white supremacist POS...

 

[ETV]

Perhaps Democrats need to ask for ID from caucus members before allowing them to vote?

 

[FLVOL_79]

Can source that last sentence? All I see is your conjecture which started with "You can't honestly believe..."

if you look up crazy in the dictionary it has a picture of..