thunder5
Cause I like to party
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2006
- Messages
- 10,441
- Likes
- 8,369
This is the mindset we have to get away from and is "apparently" the exact same mindset that got us into trouble this past year with Hurd. ONE Player does not define a class and ONE Player does not define a team. The minute you start having the mentality that the team or class is defined by one player your whole stock is in that person and you start catering to them no matter how it affects the other ten men on the field.
11 players all have to execute for a play to be successful its tough to get that when your focus is on one.
I agree with this...I certainly don't want to marginalize the importance of the team being one cohesive unit...it would be more accurate for me to say that I don't consider this class a failure but I am disappointed and one player would have changed that...and I believe the perception of this class would be universally higher if that one player was a part of it