RockyTopTexas
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2016
- Messages
- 2,602
- Likes
- 3,180
Oh look. Another life championship joke. That is really, really funny and original. Wait, no.....no it isn't. It is simply tired and stale. But, you do you, if it makes you feel better.
The championship of life thing is as done as saying cool beans. Please stop saying both
They're still loading that bandwagon with fans, you still have a spot so why don't you go jump on it and gtfo..........
That's odd considering 247 only shows UT with 1 5* and 4 4* signees. None of the teams ranked ahead of them has less than 9 4/5* players. The 87.14 avg score they gave UT signees is lower than all of the avg's of the teams above them and 21 of the 24 other programs in their top 25.
If 247 "loves" this class... they have a really, really odd way of expressing that love.
Y'all a bunch of star gazers. Jordan Matthews was 3 star going to Vandy. Where is he now? A pro player. Stars mean crap tbh.
Please just stop with the "Stars mean crap" crap. We can all find multiple individual examples of 3-star or lower guys who turn out to be great and 5-star can't miss guys who fail miserably.
However, NO credible source disputes that a much higher percentage of 4-5 star recruits become contributing starters than 0-3 star recruits. Raw numbers don't cut it, so keep that to yourself. there are 1000's more 0-3 star rated players in the last 3+ years than 4-5 star.
Bottom line is the more 4-5 star players, the more successful a program is likely to be. Exactly how successful will depend on the coach. Aside from this year, Mike Dantonio would be someone most would say did more with less, and Les Miles did less with more. But for any given coach, if they recruit higher rated players, will get better results if the only criteria is physical talent.
I posted this in the RFFT thread earlier, according to DOC and Heather on the sports animal this morning, no team since 1996 has one the National Championship without finishing in the top ten in recruiting the 4 years prior.
The fight is over.
There is no debate, and never should have been.
Carry on, gents.
History shows national titles without elite recruiting over 4 years is rare
Not true, was posted in the football forum that the 4 year average from 2003 to 2016, 11 of the 14 did.
2003 LSU 12th
2010 Auburn 16th
2016 Clemson 13th
Not saying it's not important, just that statement is wrong
I don't start a lot of threads anymore but I thought this topic was worth its own discussion...
In all of my years of following recruiting I'm not sure I've ever seen one class be so thoroughly defined by one player...and that player (IMO) was Tee Higgins...
Adding Higgins would have only bumped us to about #12 in the various rankings so it's not like we are suddenly top 5 with him...but there's more to it than just the ranking...we lost a 5 star can't miss talent out of back yard in a highly public fashion...and then to add insult to injury our 5 star WR leaves early for the draft...leaving a gaping hole that Higgins would have filled perfectly...
Maybe it's just me...maybe the rest of you see other significant holes that would still bother you even if we landed Higgins...but to me it's simply comes down to him...add him to this class and I'm celebrating a really good and perfectly acceptable NSD...losing him made this class below average and disappointing to me
This class will build quality depth and produce several high impact stars. Period. It's a solid class. No reason for disappointment.
I think that the large intestine and colon are on in the same, guts are guts.This class comes down to one thing...
And I can sum it all up in just one word: courage, dedication, daring, pride, pluck, spirit, grit, mettle, and G-U-T-S, *guts*. Why, this class has got more guts in it's little finger than most of us have in our large intestine, including the colon!
Hey let's go to the Super Bowl. Again. I know, it's getting a little boring watching us do it over and over again. So let's throw a wrinkle in there. This year, let's do it with a bunch of short white boys at wide receiver. Let's say from Texas Tech, Kent State, and... let's see, just to make sure everyone knows we can do whatever the heck we want and still win? Let's say Monmouth.
Sincerely,
The New England Patriots
Danny Amendola (3 star, 5'11", Texas Tech)
Julian Edelman (2 star, 6'0", Kent State)
Chris Hogan (Penn State lacrosse player, one year playing football at Monmouth, 6'1")
The way I see it, either:
1) Recruiting evaluations are an inexact science, and those three were far better than anyone thought.
2) The evaluations were right about talent and potential but if you coach someone and put them in a system that suits them they can succeed, and punch far above their weight.
Either way, I'll know a lot more how I feel about this class around, say, 2020. For now, I'll stick with welcoming them to the Vols!
I am so tired of watching us sign 3 star athletes, when our competition is signing multiple 4 and 5 star football players. It all starts with the talent on the field, coaching can only do so much, but better athletes will always be where good football teams begin. Butch cannot get those athletes unless they are legacies, and he is missing on those now. Please let's get an AD that will get us a top level head coach!!!!
It never comes down to one player. The rankings when it comes to specific players simply aren't that accurate and never have been. The most 5* players I've seen in a single class was Fulmer's next to last. He landed five of them. Do you remember any of these great contributors to UT football? Chris Donald, Kenny O'Neal, Brent Vinson, Ben Martin.
Martin of course played through injuries but was never a 5* level contributor. The others were busts. Only Berry lived up to the hype.
HOWEVER.... when you look at the quality of classes being signed by their "star average" or some other consistent factor like that then there is a pretty obvious correlation almost all of the time between talent and wins. So this class is defined by 3.29... 3.29 stars on average.
"Average" is a pretty good way of labeling it. Not top tier. Not even 2nd tier. Just "average". An average of the average stars of SEC recruiting classes this year is 3.31.... average. UT was 7th out of 14 teams. Average. The average SEC team this year signed 9.2 4/5* players. UT signed 9... Average.
The problem is that average talent won't win championships. Average talent lands you in the bottom tier with occasional "up" years when you win 9 to break into the 2nd tier. Worse yet, Jones has yet to prove he's even an average coach when it comes to player development, team management, and game day.
The main difference between Jones and Les Miles right now is that Miles always loaded his team with talent and a good S&C program.
It never comes down to one player. The rankings when it comes to specific players simply aren't that accurate and never have been. The most 5* players I've seen in a single class was Fulmer's next to last. He landed five of them. Do you remember any of these great contributors to UT football? Chris Donald, Kenny O'Neal, Brent Vinson, Ben Martin.
Martin of course played through injuries but was never a 5* level contributor. The others were busts. Only Berry lived up to the hype.
HOWEVER.... when you look at the quality of classes being signed by their "star average" or some other consistent factor like that then there is a pretty obvious correlation almost all of the time between talent and wins. So this class is defined by 3.29... 3.29 stars on average.
"Average" is a pretty good way of labeling it. Not top tier. Not even 2nd tier. Just "average". An average of the average stars of SEC recruiting classes this year is 3.31.... average. UT was 7th out of 14 teams. Average. The average SEC team this year signed 9.2 4/5* players. UT signed 9... Average.
The problem is that average talent won't win championships. Average talent lands you in the bottom tier with occasional "up" years when you win 9 to break into the 2nd tier. Worse yet, Jones has yet to prove he's even an average coach when it comes to player development, team management, and game day.
The main difference between Jones and Les Miles right now is that Miles always loaded his team with talent and a good S&C program.
Really there are 27 signed yesterday that beg to differ. Also see Barnett, Sutton, Dobbs etc... all of who were 3* coming out!
Bye Felicia!
:thud:
Tennesseeduke