This is not normal: Trump's tweet storm

#526
#526
hog88 said:
I don't really hate anyone, I just prefer not to have to deal with most. Especially those that think they know better than I what's good for me.
Click to expand...
A-freaking-men! I can disagree with somebody and leave it at that as long as they leave me alone in kind. However when I disagree with a leftie, rightie, or middleie and they then intend to impose their views on me they can all GTFO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, 1972 Grad and BigOrangeD
#528
#528
AshG said:
I agree. It's a constant reminder of why we can't have nice things.
Click to expand...
Perhaps. But it ain't going back to twice a day newspapers. 'Cell phones' are ubiquitous. Everybody has them. Everybody has access to 'the net'. What is interesting is that these devices which have connected anyone with everyone have driven a wedge between you and someone that might be 3 feet from you. I digress.

I am going to stick by my contention that Mr Trump has eviscerated the MSM and they are terrified. That explains their jihad against him. Were he to be more calm/civil in his tweets, Wolf Blitzer would already be selling shoes, and the CNN building would be condos.
 
#531
#531
lawgator1 said:
So I take it you have not. Thus, you do not know the sources of that information. Therefore, you are unqualified to judge its truth or falsity.

The issue is not its criminality. It is use of video to compromise him. If its true -- and really if there are hookers involved at all not just what happened -- then Trump must leave office immediately due to the Russians being in a position to blackmail him over it. It would not even be a close call. Out.
Click to expand...
Wrong. You watch too much CNN LG. Boomerang has already started coming back your way.

As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, Obsessed and tennvols77
#532
#532
lawgator1 said:
So I take it you have not. Thus, you do not know the sources of that information. Therefore, you are unqualified to judge its truth or falsity.

The issue is not its criminality. It is use of video to compromise him. If its true -- and really if there are hookers involved at all not just what happened -- then Trump must leave office immediately due to the Russians being in a position to blackmail him over it. It would not even be a close call. Out.
Click to expand...

Let's just review. It's pretty much a given Trump was banging porn stars, playboy models and other prostitutes and no one really cares. How would a video of him getting pissed on by more hookers be a blackmail tool?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, SpaceCoastVol and tennvols77
#534
#534
hog88 said:
Let's just review. It's pretty much a given Trump was banging porn stars, playboy models and other prostitutes and no one really cares. How would a video of him getting pissed on by more hookers be a blackmail tool?
Click to expand...

You don't see a qualitative difference between generally assuming he was engaged in that conduct versus the Russians having video of him doing some really extreme things?
 
#536
#536
lawgator1 said:
You don't see a qualitative difference between generally assuming he was engaged in that conduct versus the Russians having video of him doing some really extreme things?
Click to expand...

No. Other than his wife and the hard core Dems nobody would care. He was/is a philandering douche-bag which wasn't a secret.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, NorthDallas40 and tennvols77
#537
#537
RockyTop85 said:
Show me, in the warrant application, where they swore the document was true.

They didn’t. They never swear to second hand information. In a case like this, or any involving second hand information, Law enforcement swear that they have received evidence and state what the evidence is. The judge determines how much weight to give it and whether that amounts to probable cause.

Who wrote the dossier? A non governmental informant. As the Supreme Court just told you, the veracity of their statements to police are not a recognized basis for challenging the validity of a warrant. If they were expected to always be able to prove their second hand information, they wouldn’t need a warrant to keep investigating.

Your argument is pure legal fiction.
Click to expand...
If you are correct that means that all sorts of bogus crap is permissible when seeking a warrant "as long a a judge determines how much weight to give it".
 
#540
#540
hog88 said:
Let's just review. It's pretty much a given Trump was banging porn stars, playboy models and other prostitutes and no one really cares. How would a video of him getting pissed on by more hookers be a blackmail tool?
Click to expand...
Why would he secretly pay them of hundreds of thousands of dollars, possibly illegally with campaign money, and then lie about it, if it wasn't a big deal. If he will do that to cover banging an American porn star, what would he do to cover getting peed on by a Ruskie?
 
#541
#541
BigOrangeD said:
I don't twit either but the President has to get his message out when the Fake News keeps distorting everything. We may not like it but it is necessary IMO.
Click to expand...
lol........You have Fox, Rush, and the rest of the right wing propaganda machine doing that. The people who get his tweets are the same ones already consuming right wing propaganda. Anyone else receiving his tweets is doing so solely to see what kind of lying nonsense he is propagating.
 
#542
#542
luthervol said:
lol........You have Fox, Rush, and the rest of the right wing propaganda machine doing that. The people who get his tweets are the same ones already consuming right wing propaganda. Anyone else receiving his tweets is doing so solely to see what kind of lying nonsense he is propagating.
Click to expand...
Tide is turning Luther.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
#544
#544
luthervol said:
lol........You have Fox, Rush, and the rest of the right wing propaganda machine doing that. The people who get his tweets are the same ones already consuming right wing propaganda. Anyone else receiving his tweets is doing so solely to see what kind of lying nonsense he is propagating.
Click to expand...
You're so desperate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01 and Carl Pickens
#545
#545
luthervol said:
Why would he secretly pay them of hundreds of thousands of dollars, possibly illegally with campaign money, and then lie about it, if it wasn't a big deal. If he will do that to cover banging an American porn star, what would he do to cover getting peed on by a Ruskie?
Click to expand...

He didn't want the fact he was banging hokers to come out, that's why he paid them off. Now that fact is out there what good is a hooker pee tape?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77 and NorthDallas40
#549
#549
lawgator1 said:
You don't see a qualitative difference between generally assuming he was engaged in that conduct versus the Russians having video of him doing some really extreme things?
Click to expand...
Trump may have let a hooker pee on him but dems consistently s*** on the country so who cares if a hooker took a piss on him. Plus what happened to dems not caring what consenting adults do in their bedroom?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top