If the Vols have a chance at Stevens or Frank and are too cheap to invest the money needed to get them, I'm baffled. Why are we willing to put gazillions into facilities and then not pay the right coach? It's lunacy.
I've heard that this is exactly the case.
Apparently no one on The Hill understands ROI, and believe that its safer to protect the $13M in bball revenue by not paying a premium for a coach - when in fact, they're jeopardizing far more than the $1M that would likely give them their choice of candidates.
Like LWS said in another thread, the examples of Saban's Bama contract and Florida's combined $7M coaching salaries (between CUM and Donovan) - and the windfall which each produced, is absolutely lost on them.
Some say it's "risk averse" or "fiscally conservative" - I say its near-sighted at best and plain stupidity at worst.
Especially when these same people were just feeling so charitable in giving a cheating liar an unnecessary parting gift of $2M - and now who has effectively served to greatly hinder the hiring of his replacement via the money he got (that $2M would come in handy about now, huh?) and the cloud of sanctions which he left over the program.
If you're going to lavish someone, let it be the guy who you're bringing in, and not shoving out. And save all of the "Pearl made this such a better job than before" nonsense, too - because the current list of candidates looks eerily like the last one, if not worse, if you ask me. All of his "hard work" doesn't seem to be helping us right now, does it?
Maybe we'll get lucky with a less-expensive coach - and I hope we do, for sure - but that is too often the exception and not the rule.
My $.02
Posted via VolNation Mobile