MiramarVol
Sanctified Vol
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2009
- Messages
- 11,880
- Likes
- 10,928
Starting to believe that, honestly.
Doesn't it make sense though?
People say look at the quality of offers over the ratings.
People want us to be fighting for recruits against Bama, not beating out UNC-Charlotte.
People think Bama has the most talent every year.
People think college staffs are better evaluators than recruiting services.
People think Bama has elite evaluations.
.
.
.
But then are surprised when a Bama offer gets a bump.
Yea b/c thet bend every which way to defend their rankings (used pappoe height and frame a reason to drop him, even though he's had the same measurements since middle school), claiming who's winners and losers in recruiting (how you giving out wins & loses when you don't know how to evaluate?) , AND giving out ratings to non-existent people. That's just 3 examples of million I could list....They believe more in Saban than themselves. Are they wrong for doing so?
Rivals rankings:T-shirt and shorts champion of the world. How you rank a kid that high with those stats is beyond me and laughable.
Rivals rankings:
1)They start with which schools offer and number of offers.
2)If a kid participates in their camp they receive a bump. If not they get a decrease in rankings.
3)If a kid commits to a certain school I.E. Bama or Ohio State, they get an additional bump. If they commit to a school like UT they get penalized in ranking