At oral argument, Andrzejewski claimed that his “conduct was still justified because he had probable cause to believe [Soukaneh] was possessing a firearm without a permit as he had not yet been able to verify the validity of the permit.” In other words, because Soukaneh “disclosed he had a weapon in the vehicle,” that gave him probable cause to search and seize Soukaneh. In Connecticut, carrying a pistol in a car without a permit is a Class D felony.
Joseph Sobolewski walked into a convenience store in Perry County where there was a special for 20-ounce Mountain Dew bottles: 2 for $3.
Sobolewski took one bottle, put down $2 on the counter and walked out, PennLive reported. The store called the police and he was arrested. What Sobolewski may not have known was that a single bottle of Mountain Dew cost $2.29, not $1.50.
So a guy with more than a decade of thefts should just be allowed to steal again?Half the problem is the cop that actually carried out this arrest, but certainly the other half goes to us (civilians) for even reporting this crap. The cop and the cashier need their asses whipped.
Homeless Pennsylvania man faces 7 years for allegedly underpaying for Mountain Dew by 43 cents
There is a difference between what is legal and what is just (justice).He didn’t get 7 years for just that. He got 7 years because as per his probation from multiple other felonies.
He signed off as part of his probation that he knew that any further crime would be his third strike. How can you not understand thisThere is a difference between what is legal and what is just (justice).
Justice was not served here. But you didn't disappoint me because I knew you would come in and support this because it was "legal".
He purposefully paid $2 for a 2 for $3 drink...What should happen to someone who constantly breaks the law, then signs an agreeement to be let out of prison and knows he can’t do anything illegal again and then purposefully does it again?
A modern day John Dillinger apparently.What should happen to someone who constantly breaks the law, then signs an agreeement to be let out of prison and knows he can’t do anything illegal again and then purposefully does it again?
So he actually shorted the store by 43 cents, or 29 cents for the bottle plus tax. He is being held on a $50,000 bond and faces up to seven years in prison.
He stole something regardless if it was 50 cents or $3000. And when given the opportunity to correct the crime he told the clerk to basically F off. The guy should’ve never been let out after the first 10 or so theftsHe purposefully paid $2 for a 2 for $3 drink...
And as a result, the taxpayers are on the hook to give him 3 hots and a cot for 7 more years. That doesn't make judicial sense or fiscal sense. But it is legal.
And the solution was for the guy to go to jail for 7 years over a 43 cent infraction? You are not close to being rational or just. But hey, you follow those laws to the letter.He stole something regardless if it was 50 cents or $3000. And when given the opportunity to correct the crime he told the clerk to basically F off. The guy should’ve never been let out after the first 10 or so thefts
I don’t see what else you expect to do with a career criminal that constantly does the same thing 20-30 timesAnd the solution was for the guy to go to jail for 7 years over a 43 cent infraction? You are not close to being rational or just. But hey, you follow those laws to the letter.
I bet you cannot wait to take the guns away from the "sovereign citizens" when that time comes. Because this is the mindset that you will carry when it comes time to do that.
And the incident by itself it would’ve been handled differently. But as per his probation and the long history of thefts and other stuff, it all adds upIt could have been resolved for pennies. Now the taxpayer is on the hook.
Not every minor infraction needs end in arrest. To eve think of this as criminal activity is a stretch.