To Protect and to Serve II

As long as you have a drivers license, your car is registered and you use the tags they supply, you have an adhesion contract with that state. They have the right to use pc and civil statutes against you.

The right? No. If they legitimately have PC, then they are not violating the 4th amendment. Often, it depends on how good of a lawyer you can afford.
 
That was a very unpleasant read...primarily because it doesn't lend itself to being viewed in anything remotely "bad apple" but the dreaded "systemic".
Sounds like a federal investigation is definitely in order. But we are talking about 7 officers. The smart thing would be to have the sheriff take over that cities calls for service and jurisdiction which he sounded like he was angling for anyway. My guess is they will be disbanded soon
 
Just following orders. Of course you know if the orders ever come to confiscate guns or give the jab cops wouldn’t do it
Lmao nope just enforcing trespassing laws again off of idiots who are trying to make a political statement on someone else’s property
 
Lmao nope just enforcing trespassing laws again off of idiots who are trying to make a political statement on someone else’s property

But of course when businesses were being looted and burnt down during the riots the cops stood down. This was also people making a political statement on someone else’s property. Most of the people rioting weren’t wearing masks. Why weren’t they arrested?

Now we have people who are not bothering anyone being arrested because of an unconstitutional mandate.

How can you even defend this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
As long as you have a drivers license, your car is registered and you use the tags they supply, you have an adhesion contract with that state. They have the right to use pc and civil statutes against you.

There’s this pesky thing called 4th amendment that cops hate.

DTH posted an article about PC above. Cops make up probably cause all the time. Burnt out tag lights, small crack in the corner of your windshield, something hanging on your rearview mirror.
 
But of course when businesses were being looted and burnt down during the riots the cops stood down. This was also people making a political statement on someone else’s property. Most of the people rioting weren’t wearing masks. Why weren’t they arrested?

Now we have people who are not bothering anyone being arrested because of an unconstitutional mandate.

How can you even defend this?
I am 100% for anyone being arrested for looting and arson. And they aren’t being arrested for a mandate. They are being arrested for trespassing
 
I am 100% for anyone being arrested for looting and arson. And they aren’t being arrested for a mandate. They are being arrested for trespassing

You are 100% for anyone being arrested for looting and arson? Yet you defend LE for standing down? The looters and arsonist were trespassing also, but weren’t arrested because of orders to stand down.

Now people are being arrested for “trespassing” because they are not wearing a mask and you defend this bullsh$t.

So what you are basically saying that laws are not enforced equally or justly by LE? And you are ok with that?
 
There’s this pesky thing called 4th amendment that cops hate.

DTH posted an article about PC above. Cops make up probably cause all the time. Burnt out tag lights, small crack in the corner of your windshield, something hanging on your rearview mirror.
Lol that has nothing to do with the 4th amendment.
 

VN Store



Back
Top