Trans men cant handle their monthly visitor

[82_VOL_83]

Dink already quoted it. We may use a slightly more modern version

I'm pretty sure it would need to be from the Book of Gore to contain a reference to the interwebs use for mass slander.

 

[BigOrangeD]

Just trying to follow here. Am I understanding you correctly that as long as we repent, its okay to sin because all.of our sins past, present and future have been paid for in full?

Not OK but let's say they are covered by Grace if you have Trsuted Jesus as your Lord and Savior. Being saved is not a license to sin. We all sin that is why Jesus died on the Cross. It's up to us to make the choice to Trust in Him or not.

 

[BigOrangeD]

What do you mean when you call others Dims? Are you not taking a shot at their intelligence?

It's a political forum. Everyone on here does similar stuff. It is what it is. Most can take it. We get called Redhaters, Racists, Crazy, etc.

 

[BigOrangeD]

He convicted the woman at the well about her sin before offering Himself as the living water. It was a part of loving her. It's absolutely ridiculous to think that you can offer someone grace without calling them a sinner. You're an idiot to tell them that God will forgive them if you think you can;t tell them what they need forgiveness for.

(Not "you" you. "We" You and "them" You.)

Exactly

 

[utvolpj]

It's a political forum. Everyone on here does similar stuff. It is what it is. Most can take it. We get called Redhaters, Racists, Crazy, etc.

I see you aren't comfortable just answering the question. Understandable given your claims of piety

So the forum is what makes the difference? You can't do it in person but anonymous insults are no harm no foul?

 

[BigOrangeD]

I see you aren't comfortable just answering the question. Understandable given your claims of piety

So the forum is what makes the difference? You can't do it in person but anonymous insults are no harm no foul?

I already admitted that I will not. Again, I am just as much a sinner as you. I am willing to admit it. You want to argue a moot point.

 

[Purple Tiger]

I got the same slang in downtown Cincinnati. You really need to stop digging yourself a hole there bud or babe or whatever you are today.

WTF does this mean?

 

[Roustabout]

I already admitted that I will not. Again, I am just as much a sinner as you. I am willing to admit it. You want to argue a mute point.

Moot point

 

[utvolpj]

Moot point

And just when I was enjoying the silence

 

[Orange_Crush]

Moot point

Why don't you moot yourself, big mouth?

 

[BigOrangeD]

Moot point

Thank you.

 

[Roustabout]

I see you aren't comfortable just answering the question. Understandable given your claims of piety

So the forum is what makes the difference? You can't do it in person but anonymous insults are no harm no foul?

Context always makes a difference. Locker room talk is different than around your grandmothers dining table. Stop badgering him.

 

[utvolpj]

Context always makes a difference. Locker room talk is different than around your grandmothers dining table. Stop badgering him.

He insults large groups of people but doesn't have the guts to own up to it while also taking about how religious he is. That's fraudulent behavior. Sorry but I get called out enough that I'll post whatever I want. Your white knight status is noted though and appreciated throughout the kingdom of Voldom

 

[AM64]

These examples don’t really deal with the concerns I’m taking about.

If someone is actually a male and I confuse them for a female has nothing to do with what we are discussing.

If someone suffering from G.D. wants to be considered the opposite sex from what they were born then I’m not going to antagonize them. No more than I would hold a piece of cake in front of someone with an eating disorder.

That is a far cry from wanting to compete in sporting events or prescribe youth puberty blockers, have the military pay for gender reassignment, or teaching curriculum that says traditional gender roles are bigoted and hateful.

It’s really quite pathetic, after taking the care to share all I have, that you reduce this to me refusing to call Don by the name Deborah.

Hope and humiliation is often all the left has to work with. When they can't beat you with fact or dazzle you with BS, they just go for bigot using whatever "ist" term they deem applies. What they fail to understand is that it's so overused on us "deplorables" that it just doesn't work any more ... their contempt just doesn't reach down to our level of insensitive depravity ... pretty much like we can't seem to find common sense in an oh so feeling liberal.

 

[Orange_Crush]

I already admitted that I will not. Again, I am just as much a sinner as you. I am willing to admit it. You want to argue a moot point.

He insults large groups of people but doesn't have the guts to own up to it while also taking about how religious he is. That's fraudulent behavior. Sorry but I get called out enough that I'll post whatever I want. Your white knight status is noted though and appreciated throughout the kingdom of Voldom

Really?

He's reiterated that his "religion" is that we're all sinners in need of grace. He's a sinner in need of grace.

Not OK but let's say they are covered by Grace if you have Trsuted Jesus as your Lord and Savior. Being saved is not a license to sin. We all sin that is why Jesus died on the Cross. It's up to us to make the choice to Trust in Him or not.

Seems to me, he fessed up to the fgact that he's missed tghe mark, won't use it as an excuse, but relies on the grace and forgiveness preached by his "religion".

You go right ahead and post whatever you want and keep ignoring whatever you want as well.

 

[utvolpj]

Really?

He's reiterated that his "religion" is that we're all sinners in need of grace. He's a sinner in need of grace.




Seems to me, he fessed up to the fgact that he's missed tghe mark, won't use it as an excuse, but relies on the grace and forgiveness preached by his "religion".

You go right ahead and post whatever you want and keep ignoring whatever you want as well.

He didn't fess up he just made an excuse for his very consistent and purposeful behavior. The goal was to continually insult and belittle others.That's planned and not simply a momentary weakness

 

[Roustabout]

He insults large groups of people but doesn't have the guts to own up to it while also taking about how religious he is. That's fraudulent behavior. Sorry but I get called out enough that I'll post whatever I want. Your white knight status is noted though and appreciated throughout the kingdom of Voldom

He’s flawed like the rest of us. Put him on ignore.

 

[Roustabout]

He didn't fess up he just made an excuse for his very consistent and purposeful behavior. The goal was to continually insult and belittle others.That's planned and not simply a momentary weakness

I’m trying to look back through the posts. What exactly are you going on about?

 

[AM64]

Not that I would tell you or not that I would EVER demand anyone have to deal with AT WORK. This is another useless HR BS attitude. HR coddles abnormalities and makes them acceptable in the work place. HR brings the feelz into places where people need to do their ****ing jobs instead of talking about the gay pride parade they participated in. This was a real topic in our latest "don't hate gay" training. A kid wanted to "share" in a staff meeting of all places what gay pride meant to him. I don't care if you are gay, trans, bi or whatever, leave that at home and do your ****ing job.

Thanks HR for making the millennials happy and basically screwing up the last bastion of leave me the **** alone. Bolded is one of the reasons that the US is going in the shitter as quickly as it is.

HR needs to understand perhaps more than any other organization that if you consider any office banter that includes sexual overtones as potentially "sexual aggression or assault" for one person then you have to include it for all. It's either unacceptable for all or not acceptable of anyone to state or in anyway present sexual preference where it is deemed inappropriate behavior. The workplace is no more the appropriate stage for crude dirty jokes or sexual innuendo than it is for inappropriate sexual attire or misplaced identity.

 

[AM64]

You are completely wrong. The chief purpose of HR is to eliminate or mitigate any possible liability to the company with regards to pay, benefits and employee conduct. HR had those classes to keep employees from discriminating against gay people, women and minorities. The reason they have these classes is that ass clown employees continue to harass and/or discriminate against the people mentioned above at work. Any corporation committed to making a profit is worried about how people in their employ are treated because they DO NOT WANT TO BE SUED.

Then that corporation should be perfectly clear that private matters are private matters - to be left outside the workplace ... that it's no more acceptable to promote male homosexuality than to promote male heterosexuality or whatever else in the workplace. What someone does in the bedroom or privately elsewhere is none of my business, so don't attempt to make it my business in the workplace, and we'll get along just fine. One person's rights do not supersede another person's rights, and people need to be figuring that out PDQ.

 

[AM64]

What does your bible say about continually insulting large groups of people online? Just curious

Hmmm, I'll have to check, but I don't think electronic social media was around back then, but feel free to create the answer anyway. There's plenty of other revisionism going around, so what's a little more.

 

[AM64]

What do you mean when you call others Dims? Are you not taking a shot at their intelligence?

That's actually hard to say since the left wing dims have captured the party and moved the target so low these days. I prefer to see it as their vision or version of political reality isn't real bright.

 

[82_VOL_83]

Then that corporation should be perfectly clear that private matters are private matters - to be left outside the workplace ... that it's no more acceptable to promote male homosexuality than to promote male heterosexuality or whatever else in the workplace. What someone does in the bedroom or privately elsewhere is none of my business, so don't attempt to make it my business in the workplace, and we'll get along just fine. One person's rights do not supersede another person's rights, and people need to be figuring that out PDQ.

What really gets me the most is that we even have to have this conversation at all anymore. As long as a person does a good job and keeps their personal lives out of professional conversation and discourse then it's all good. Why do I have to be CONSTANTLY reminded that "oh this person is gay or this person is transgender and they have the same rights you do and don't hurt their feelings?" I posted above the 5 minute training class. Read it, Sign it, live with the consequences.

 

[Rickyvol77]

People who define themselves by their mental illness or disabilities or sexual fetishes are shallow

 

[AM64]

What really gets me the most is that we even have to have this conversation at all anymore. As long as a person does a good job and keeps their personal lives out of professional conversation and discourse then it's all good. Why do I have to be CONSTANTLY reminded that "oh this person is gay or this person is transgender and they have the same rights you do and don't hurt their feelings?" I posted above the 5 minute training class. Read it, Sign it, live with the consequences.

Exactly. I love the hypocrisy of liberals who have a problem with the selection of a conservative to the judiciary but are fine with the bias that a "wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life" brings to the court. It's the same thought process that seems to extend to exclusionary behavior elsewhere ... one set of rules for you, but we'll liberally make up ours as we progress.