I heard she had one planned for the weekend.
This is completely inaccurate. Kelly Miller was a two time SEC Player of the Year -- ahead of Catchings. She was also the #2 pick in the WNBA draft behind Lauren Jackson but ahead of, once again, Catchings. Coco was the ninth pick...
You "heard" as in someone told you directly? Or, you read it on an anonymous message board?![]()
Hello when I joined her live she said she was flying out in the morning so I thought she meant going to a visit. But she did say she had one this coming weekend. So I’m guessing it’s LSU. She didn’t visit this past weekend.
She also was happy for MSSTATE hiring Sam for the team. She said he’s a very nice guy and recruited her for Louisville. She has a great personality and funny.
Actually, their stats were the best in their Freshmen and Sophomore years compared to their later years. As Freshmen, they already looked like world beaters, with great PPG averages, high shooting percentages, high assists, etc. It looked like Georgia could be on it's way to dominate women's basketball with how talented the twins were. Unfortunately for them and Georgia, their stats slightly regressed in their later years and often would choke in big games to prevent Georgia from meeting expectations.
Funny you mentioned how high they were picked by the WNBA yet Coco averaged under 5.0 ppg for her career while Kelly did somewhat better (10ppg) but hardly the all star better than Catchings.
They were very good players but I don't ever remember them beating any of Pat's teams. Maybe they did. That has been a few years back. The very reason Lander's hates the Lady Vols to this very day.This is completely inaccurate. Kelly Miller was a two time SEC Player of the Year -- ahead of Catchings. She was also the #2 pick in the WNBA draft behind Lauren Jackson but ahead of, once again, Catchings. Coco was the ninth pick...
They slaughtered Tennessee in Catch's senior year. I believe it was one of their worst losses ever by MOV (at the time...Holly broke a lot of records).They
They were very good players but I don't ever remember them beating any of Pat's teams. Maybe they did. That has been a few years back. The very reason Lander's hates the Lady Vols to this very day.
They slaughtered Tennessee in Catch's senior year. I believe it was one of their worst losses ever by MOV (at the time...Holly broke a lot of records).
I mean, you're just making stuff up at this point. I watched a lot of their games. The Millers were very emotional players and wore their hearts on their sleeves. But man did they play hard. I find it funny that you say they didn't progress when Kelly finished her career as the only player in school history to rank in the top 10 in points, rebounds, assists and steals. Oh, and she was named the best player in the SEC as a junior and senior, and a WBCA All American 3x. Georgia reached a Final Four and an Elite 8 during their playing years. I mean, what more were you expecting? Those are career accomplishments that would be considered elite by any objective measure. Seriously, just accept that you were wrong.Actually, their stats were the best in their Freshmen and Sophomore years compared to their later years. As Freshmen, they already looked like world beaters, with great PPG averages, high shooting percentages, high assists, etc. It looked like Georgia could be on it's way to dominate women's basketball with how talented the twins were. Unfortunately for them and Georgia, their stats slightly regressed in their later years and often would choke in big games to prevent Georgia from meeting expectations. Georgia did get to the Final 4 once, but often didn't win the biggest games. If you watched Georgia, you would see with your own eyes the rage Andy would repeatedly direct at them. Sometimes they would come in after that and play harder, but in big games they often they would responded by making uncharacteristic mistakes. I think they always were thought to be so good due to their early potential, and honestly they were good even in the later years. They just didn't progress. It is not uncommon for many players to get hyped in the early years and then get awards in their later years even if they were somewhat subpar. Funny you mentioned how high they were picked by the WNBA yet Coco averaged under 5.0 ppg for her career while Kelly did somewhat better (10ppg) but hardly the all star better than Catchings. I have nothing against them and they were good players. They just didn't thrive the way they were expected to under Landers, and they never surpassed their play in their first two years of college. I can't imagine his rage was helpful.
They had some great matches after Catch went down for the season. There was that great win vs. UConn where Gwen Jackson went off and then beating a loaded Georgia team. They probably used up all of their emotional energy by the time Xavier took them out in the S16.It was actually Catch's junior season, Georgia beat them by about 30 points. They finished tied with Tennessee for the SEC regular season title that season but the Lady Vols would win the conference tournament.
Catch missed the game her senior year, it was actually the first game after she tore her ACL and the Lady Vols played an inspired game at home to beat Georgia. The Lady Bulldogs would win the SEC tournament (after Vandy upset the Lady Vols)...
I mean, you're just making stuff up at this point. I watched a lot of their games. The Millers were very emotional players and wore their hearts on their sleeves. But man did they play hard. I find it funny that you say they didn't progress when Kelly finished her career as the only player in school history to rank in the top 10 in points, rebounds, assists and steals. Oh, and she was named the best player in the SEC as a junior and senior, and a WBCA All American 3x. Georgia reached a Final Four and an Elite 8 during their playing years. I mean, what more were you expecting? Those are career accomplishments that would be considered elite by any objective measure. Seriously, just accept that you were wrong.
Randall blew out a knee and was never the sameAnd that's exactly what happened with Catchings and Randall. Their best stats were during their first couple of seasons. They went undefeated as freshmen and looked like they would own women's basketball for the next three seasons. Their numbers regressed and they never won another title. Does that mean Pat didn't develop them?
How they actually performed in the WNBA is irrelevant. I'm not arguing Kelly was better than Catch and deserved to be picked ahead. I'm saying the fact that they were so highly regarded by WNBA general managers to be picked so high speaks volumes to how Landers developed them in college. Whereas Semeka Randall looked like a surefire top 5 pick early in her career, she wasn't even picked in the first round by the time she graduated....
They had some great matches after Catch went down for the season. There was that great win vs. UConn where Gwen Jackson went off and then beating a loaded Georgia team. They probably used up all of their emotional energy by the time Xavier took them out in the S16.
I still think they were at their best in the early years and their stats bear that out. However, I agree that this is my opinion in watching and following them for four years and it is not a consensus opinion. My main post never meant to slam them, as they were very good players that looked as Freshmen like they would have nearly unparalleled success, not just one final 4. My main point was that when the previous post mentioned people's memory of them, the memory that came up for me was how disturbing it was to see their interactions with their coach. I work with victims of trauma and am very aware of what being emotional is versus a trauma response. I am not hear to speak their truth, as i don't know it. What I do know and have right to speak of is that I found it disturbing in a way that I don't normally experience when I watch other coaches get onto their players. Other than that, I have never slammed Andy, Georgia, or their players here.
If we're honest, Summitt had a lot of players who looked like world beaters their first year or two but regressed over time and, in some cases, were not as good as seniors as they were as freshmen. They regressed offensively--it happened a lot--and I always attributed it to Summitt's obsession with defense and rebounding, which were what the program was built on. Summitt had some very talented players and a few strong offensive teams--but over time one could see that team offense was not a Pat coaching strength. A lot of our players seemed to lose their confidence offensively over time under Summitt. Many remember Ace Clement, a guard whom, as I recall, averaged about 35 points a game in high-school or somesuch and was reputed to be this scoring phenom. Her shooting got progressively worse while she was at UT, and by the time she was a senior she seemed reluctant to shoot at all, and would barely hit the rim with the ball on a number of occasions.
She was the reigning Naismith POY. She was probably the frontrunner before she got injured. My opinion is that the various NPOY honors would be split between her and Ruth Riley and there would be no consensus winner to sweep the awards. Catch would likely leapfrogged Kelly Miller as the #2 pick, but I think Lauren Jackson would have been #1 no matter what.I will always wonder if Catchings might have earned NPOY honors in her senior year if she hadn't torn her ACL and been lost for the season 17 games in.
And the fact that the Indiana Fever took a chance on Catch with the #3 pick in the draft spoke volumes about what kind of player she had been before the injury. The Fever organization had no idea whether Tamika would ever be the same player again following rehab, yet they spent their top pick on her.
Might Catchings have been the #1 draft pick that year if not for the ACL injury? I think there's a good chance she could have been.