Treasonous John Kerry

#26
#26
Rasputin_Vol said:
Next question is why are we (The United States) even over there? What strategic objective would toppling Assad gain for the average American on Main Street?
Click to expand...

For the average American? No gain. For the people actually running the country it lines their pockets. It also keeps Putin from building a pipeline to the Gulf which protects the petro dollar.
 
#27
#27
Weezer said:
Not that I think it rises to treason, but the probable argument for would be that he took classified U.S. intelligence and shared it with a foreign power, one that could legitimately be considered an enemy of the state. It's basically the same as spying.
Click to expand...

Based on what I see in TV shows and movies, I kinda figure we're sharing information all the time, even with enemies/non-allies. IDK if that's at all accurate, but it seems likely we would trade secrets with an enemy if we thought it was to our benefit.
 
#32
#32
n_huffhines said:
Based on what I see in TV shows and movies, I kinda figure we're sharing information all the time, even with enemies/non-allies. IDK if that's at all accurate, but it seems likely we would trade secrets with an enemy if we thought it was to our benefit.
Click to expand...
Okay, do you think the Obama administration will say they signed off on it? I highly doubt it.
 
#37
#37
n_huffhines said:
Nobody is likely to acknowledge anything
Click to expand...
True, but let's say Iran offers up undeniable proof. Does the Obama WH say "yeah, we signed off on that"? I don't think so. Nothing will come of this, but you asked a question, I tried to answer. You can take the answer for what it is, or you can continue to act incredulous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#38
#38
Weezer said:
True, but let's say Iran offers up undeniable proof. Does the Obama WH say "yeah, we signed off on that"? I don't think so. Nothing will come of this, but you asked a question, I tried to answer. You can take the answer for what it is, or you can continue to act incredulous.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about?
 
#39
#39
Weezer said:
True, but let's say Iran offers up undeniable proof. Does the Obama WH say "yeah, we signed off on that"? I don't think so. Nothing will come of this, but you asked a question, I tried to answer. You can take the answer for what it is, or you can continue to act incredulous.
Click to expand...

NSA has proof whether it happened or not.
 
#42
#42
n_huffhines said:
What are you talking about?
Click to expand...
I mean every time you ask a question and someone attempts to give you an answer, you argue. You never take an answer for what it is. Hell, I even said I didn't think it rose to treason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#43
#43
n_huffhines said:
OK, but how would this be "treason" when the offense would be against Israel, not the US? LOL
Click to expand...

Is sinister better? This explains the consistent undermining and meddling even during the Trump Administration. Is it out of the realm of possibility that Jean Kerry was doing something similar with info during someone else's Administration?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PNW Huskie, VolnJC and StarRaider
#44
#44
Weezer said:
I mean every time you ask a question and someone attempts to give you an answer, you argue. You never take an answer for what it is. Hell, I even said I didn't think it rose to treason.
Click to expand...

So my TV show and movie comment you all upset? I don't even see that as an argument. I just thought we were both talking it out, and not necessarily in opposing directions.
 
#49
#49
Weezer said:
Not that I think it rises to treason, but the probable argument for would be that he took classified U.S. intelligence and shared it with a foreign power, one that could legitimately be considered an enemy of the state. It's basically the same as spying.
Click to expand...
Wasnt Snowden accused of treason. IF, big if, this is true I could see it being on that level of reasoning.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top