Majors
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2020
- Messages
- 17,619
- Likes
- 29,459
While I agree the auto correct is complete weak sauce...does it now bother you how these media companies can restrict information, by algorithms....I mean polls show the Hunter laptop being hidden would have clearly affected 2020?
Is that sort of repression on information to the public about political figures they are voting on acceptable in your opinion??
Trying to overturn an election comes to mind. Stealing from a charitable foundation. Directing foreign dignitaries to his personal businesses. Covering for an adversarial dictator. Using the Bible as a prop.....Okay. So, what was/is Trump doing that was on the scale of the Bush family or the Clintons?
What about a government pressuring a private company like Google to supress into like what was revealed about twitter pre Elon?? That acceptable..It's not. No one forced you to use a private company's search engine.
Call me when it's Google.gov
It's literally going on in real time
Come on. You're too smart to be acting like this is just some big misunderstanding.I'm glad we can all be a little lazier when googling the Trump assassination attempt.
What about a government pressuring a private company like Google to supress into like what was revealed about twitter pre Elon?? That acceptable..
And where do you stand on these social media companies..are they publishers or open forums...do they deserve both protections and censorship rights?
Question Mr. Dink, what exactly is a “Drudge”. I’ve never even heard of that one.Who owns the highest TV ratings among those?
OAN? Drudge? Brietbart? Those have tons of traffic.
Yes, the lion's share lean left, but you also have to think of the age of each voting block. Right leaning voters are older and still watch TV for news.
He's a victim in the recent assassination attempt, which isn't an opinionSo, in your opinion, what could be done to Trump to make him a victim? If there is no action that could be taken against him that you wouldn't consider him a "victim", why? I have a good reason why I don't think Hillary would be a victim to me.... and it isn't because of mean tweets.
I don't think any media company that has rules of what can and can't be said on their platform should have any 230 protections and should be fully liable for any illegal content on their platform..I think if this happened..most of these platform would be dissolved because they would he sued into oblivion or criminally charged with (child porn, human trafficking etc...).At this point if they are selectively restricting Congress should consider removing immunity under 47 U.S.C. 230.
Trying to overturn an election comes to mind. Stealing from a charitable foundation. Directing foreign dignitaries to his personal businesses. Covering for an adversarial dictator. Using the Bible as a prop.....
Directing foreign dignitaries to his personal businesses.
Covering for an adversarial dictator.
So... who you voting for?Using the Bible as a prop.....