Trump Leading Witness Revenge Acts

Bloomberg-Kobuchar could work.

But the signs would have to be pretty big, or the print tiny.


Not enough to attract me though. Not hip on anyone that Mayor of NYC. That place is too f**** up to say they did any good.

Gabbard was the one Democratic voice I could have listened to as an alternative to trump. But, and this is my opinion only, I think they knew she would be a threat to hit a national stage, and she went after it lock stock and barrel. She wasn't playing the exposure only card Warren and Klobuchar have been. I think she had a legit shot, it wasn't her turn, and they black balled her. That's why she went outside the sand box. Only that won't work either. She has now all but dis-appeared, and that is what the DNC wanted.

When HRC is attacking you personally to keep you down, people should have realized how viable she really was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40 and AM64
C’est la vie 👍

You would speak French.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1, GVF and AM64
You have to try to convince yourself with your flawed reasoning is exactly what I was thinking. You want more proof that Trump was seeking help from Ukraine to investigate Biden?

No, do you need help understanding that it could actually be to investigate corruption rather than to harm a political "rival"? I'll give you guys credit for one thing: your party developed some most excellent anti reason inoculations, you all got them, and they totally work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
...because he (Trump) protested their (FBI and intel) invalid, illegal use of Russian propaganda - paid for by his political opponent - and largely constructed by another, antagonistic, foreign agent (Steele) to prevent his election and failing that, to remove him from office. Hell, they even falsified FISA warrants to prop up the request for a special counsel, and repeatedly falsified by omission numerous times to keep the circus going. In fact, there's nothing Democrats have not accused Trump of that they actually didn't do themselves.

Clarity.

Of all those people and entities, Trump was the one telling the damned truth the whole time.
It's obvious you have no understanding of clarity. You're conflating issues. What does the FISA warrants have to do with Trump standing on a stage and defending Putin over the CIA? Of course we know for a fact Trump was wrong in defending Putin because Russia did meddle in our elections and are continuing to do so without a peep from our President.

By proudly supporting Trump, you haven't got a f'ing as to anything regarding the truth. Another poster boy for the dumbing down of America
 
... And according to Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, a stronger President.
Bill Clinton went before the American people and apologized and exercised some humility in an effort to reunify the country. Trump wants none of that. His East Room speech and "victory lap" was deplorable. Another classic example of his thin skin and insecurity
 
It's obvious you have no understanding of clarity. You're conflating issues. What does the FISA warrants have to do with Trump standing on a stage and defending Putin over the CIA? Of course we know for a fact Trump was wrong in defending Putin because Russia did meddle in our elections and are continuing to do so without a peep from our President.

By proudly supporting Trump, you haven't got a f'ing as to anything regarding the truth. Another poster boy for the dumbing down of America

Maybe he got his intel from Obama who said it was impossible.
 
Bill Clinton went before the American people and apologized and exercised some humility in an effort to reunify the country. Trump wants none of that. His East Room speech and "victory lap" was deplorable. Another classic example of his thin skin and insecurity
LG tried the same response and I have no idea why. I'm not debating who is a better guy; just stating the obvious... However bad you thought perjury, sexual harassment or withholding foreign aid was, both came out of impeachment in better shape than they went into it.
 
LG tried the same response and I have no idea why. I'm not debating who is a better guy; just stating the obvious... However bad you thought perjury, sexual harassment or withholding foreign aid was, both came out of impeachment in better shape than they went into it.
No doubt, BUT Trump's legal woes will likely grow and follow him as he leaves the White House
 
It's obvious you have no understanding of clarity. You're conflating issues. What does the FISA warrants have to do with Trump standing on a stage and defending Putin over the CIA? Of course we know for a fact Trump was wrong in defending Putin because Russia did meddle in our elections and are continuing to do so without a peep from our President.

By proudly supporting Trump, you haven't got a f'ing as to anything regarding the truth. Another poster boy for the dumbing down of America

Maybe if you know your "friends" are out to get you, then perhaps your enemy is more honest? You could ask Julius Caesar ... except
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol
Maybe if you know your "friends" are out to get you, then perhaps your enemy is more honest? You could ask Julius Caesar ... except
Maybe Trump should develop thicker skin and not be so easily provoked. Maybe he should try to unite the country instead of intentionally dividing it. He had that opportunity last week. He passed. We know he will always care more about himself than the country
 
Maybe Trump should develop thicker skin and not be so easily provoked. Maybe he should try to unite the country instead of intentionally dividing it. He had that opportunity last week. He passed. We know he will always care more about himself than the country
He has tried, your side is the one that tried to start impeaching him on election night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40 and AM64
Bill Clinton apologized.

Trump screamed and bragged and in a stream of consciousness ramble lied 50 more times, to add to his total.
Don't you think there's a big difference in the evidence when you compare the impeachments? All the evidence against Trump has really been circumstantial. No one has been able to say Trump actually ordered a QPQ. Argue all you want about who didn't give testimony, but of those who did, they didn't provide that all important direct link. And I say that believing he did it, but there was no direct proof presented by the Dems.

In Clinton's case, you had recordings contradicting a sworn statement and physical evidence in the form of the dress. He had no recourse but to admit guilt, and thus apologize. That type of damning evidence hasn't been presented in Trump's case. More or less, it's all about what people THINK happened. And even though I think it did, I find it hard to say it was proven conclusively.
 
Maybe Trump should develop thicker skin and not be so easily provoked. Maybe he should try to unite the country instead of intentionally dividing it. He had that opportunity last week. He passed. We know he will always care more about himself than the country

Maybe, and maybe he reacted rather strongly to being undermined before he even got to do anything. A lot of us tell you that we don't like Trump as a person, but I don't get the feeling you believe us. But all that aside, few people are at their best when they step into a nest of vipers like Trump did when he came to Washington. It's hard for even the best of people to keep a sense of humor or not act belligerent when they really are out to get you. Your side can't even admit that "firing" an insubordinate subordinate is appropriate even though most businesses do it daily. Go to any of the military news sites and almost daily you'll find a commander relieved because someone "lost confidence" in him ... probably translated "he didn't follow a micro manager's party line".
 
  • Like
Reactions: JOEY'S ALL VOL !!!
He has tried, your side is the one that tried to start impeaching him on election night.
I'm not on anyone's side. That childish shat gets old and is just as ignorant and stupid as the last time you posted it

From the time he started campaigning, he's done nothing to try and unite the country. There's plenty of hard evidence that backs this point. None that supports your point. If so, please provide it and try to discuss like an adult
 
IMO, Just like Fast and Furious was going to get Obama and emails and a failed land deal were going to get the Clintons.
Barr seems driven to investigating the previous administration while ignoring his own. Expect this trend to continue when Trump is out of office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol

VN Store



Back
Top