Trump Leading Witness Revenge Acts

Maybe, and maybe he reacted rather strongly to being undermined before he even got to do anything. A lot of us tell you that we don't like Trump as a person, but I don't get the feeling you believe us. But all that aside, few people are at their best when they step into a nest of vipers like Trump did when he came to Washington. It's hard for even the best of people to keep a sense of humor or not act belligerent when they really are out to get you. Your side can't even admit that "firing" an insubordinate subordinate is appropriate even though most businesses do it daily. Go to any of the military news sites and almost daily you'll find a commander relieved because someone "lost confidence" in him ... probably translated "he didn't follow a micro manager's party line".
Your side? There are far more than two sides to this issue. Like most of your narrow minded brethren, you don't get it. Stop the pathetic rationalizations.
 
I'm not on anyone's side. That childish shat gets old and is just as ignorant and stupid as the last time you posted it

From the time he started campaigning, he's done nothing to try and unite the country. There's plenty of hard evidence that backs this point. None that supports your point. If so, please provide it and try to discuss like an adult
It’s just as true now as the first time I said it.

He has paid more attention to blacks where previous R Presidents and nominees have ignored them. He wants every American to do well unlike the radical left
 
I'm not on anyone's side. That childish shat gets old and is just as ignorant and stupid as the last time you posted it

From the time he started campaigning, he's done nothing to try and unite the country. There's plenty of hard evidence that backs this point. None that supports your point. If so, please provide it and try to discuss like an adult

Without a major existential threat to our country/way of life there is no uniting the country.

When the Soviet Union collapsed we had no enemies to unite us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I'm not on anyone's side. That childish shat gets old and is just as ignorant and stupid as the last time you posted it

From the time he started campaigning, he's done nothing to try and unite the country. There's plenty of hard evidence that backs this point. None that supports your point. If so, please provide it and try to discuss like an adult

If trying to claw back jobs that globalists gave away so that we just might possibly return to some respectable level of self reliance and a be place where people can once again be self sufficient isn't considered something to better and to unite the country, then I guess we really do have no common ground to work with. Lacking that minimal level of agreement, then there's little hope that two disparate political views can work together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40 and 37L1
Iran-Contra would be Benghazi x2 and the Starr Report in the age of #metoo would be a nuclear meltdown.
It's definitely not the direction I would go with the country but it is the way the Republicans have and will.
 
If trying to claw back jobs that globalists gave away so that we just might possibly return to some respectable level of self reliance and a be place where people can once again be self sufficient isn't considered something to better and to unite the country, then I guess we really do have no common ground to work with. Lacking that minimal level of agreement, then there's little hope that two disparate political views can work together.
Nothing wrong with vehement disagreement. The art is to come together in a sensible manner to what's best for the greater good. Nothing wrong with your premise here, it's the poor manner in which Trump has tried to do it
 
Iran-Contra would be Benghazi x2 and the Starr Report in the age of #metoo would be a nuclear meltdown.

It would be interesting to see how the #metoo movement would have reacted had it been around then. Clinton was quite popular with the ladies, I'm not so sure they would have attacked him.
 
Your side? There are far more than two sides to this issue. Like most of your narrow minded brethren, you don't get it. Stop the pathetic rationalizations.

Sure there are, but for the time being there seems to be little besides pro Trump and anti Trump. Even a matter of FBI/FISA malfeasance revolves around Trump when it should be a matter about which we are all concerned regardless of party because that kind of thing crosses almost everything this nation stands for. We became a nation because we revolted against abusive government that deemed individual rights inconsequential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
Sure there are, but for the time being there seems to be little besides pro Trump and anti Trump. Even a matter of FBI/FISA malfeasance revolves around Trump when it should be a matter about which we are all concerned regardless of party because that kind of thing crosses almost everything this nation stands for. We became a nation because we revolted against abusive government that deemed individual rights inconsequential.
Trump could reduce the size of anti-Trumpers by just showing some humility and maturity for a change. Being vindictive right now is absolutely the worst approach he could possibly take
 
Trump could reduce the size of anti-Trumpers by just showing some humility and maturity for a change. Being vindictive right now is absolutely the worst approach he could possibly take

Faced with a rational opposition, I'd completely agree. With what he's facing, it's more like a sign of weakness that they will attempt to exploit. It takes two to tango, and it takes two to disengage, but after getting smacked down, Pelosi hasn't called her dogs off ... that's a sign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
Trump could reduce the size of anti-Trumpers by just showing some humility and maturity for a change. Being vindictive right now is absolutely the worst approach he could possibly take

It would do him no good. No matter what position he takes or policy he adopts the anti's are going to take the opposite.
 
A poster discredited himself with the choice of a quackery level source for information. Nothing from "News Target" deserves to be dignified with responses.

Also sourced from politifact. But you convieniently missed responding to it as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
Maybe, and maybe he reacted rather strongly to being undermined before he even got to do anything. A lot of us tell you that we don't like Trump as a person, but I don't get the feeling you believe us. But all that aside, few people are at their best when they step into a nest of vipers like Trump did when he came to Washington. It's hard for even the best of people to keep a sense of humor or not act belligerent when they really are out to get you. Your side can't even admit that "firing" an insubordinate subordinate is appropriate even though most businesses do it daily. Go to any of the military news sites and almost daily you'll find a commander relieved because someone "lost confidence" in him ... probably translated "he didn't follow a micro manager's party line".
Trump stepping into a pit of vipers? lol
He's more like the little bratty rock throwing boy who keeps getting closer and closer to the hornets nest until he finally hits it; and then flails around screaming when he gets repeatedly stung.

Trump brought 100% of the left's reaction down on himself. Everything he did to agitate and anger the left was gleefully cheered on by his minions. Trumpers loved the us vs. them mentality of the campaign. Trumpers jumped right on board with the "the left is the enemy" and "the press is the enemy" lunacy. To ever have dreamed he would have been treated any differently than he has been treated is the height of naivety. I'm still surprised the left and the media capitulated as much as they did.
 
Barr seems driven to investigating the previous administration while ignoring his own. Expect this trend to continue when Trump is out of office.
Had to read it twice to get the implication.
 

VN Store



Back
Top