Trump set to announce an executive order against Volnation and other social media platforms.

#26
#26
But feels have already been allowed to make laws. Not advocating for this but the line has already been blurred. I agree anything should be able to deny for any reason they want in a private business. But people's feels get in the way.
And usually the right loves to make fun of those people. Guess not anymore
 
#30
#30
It is. But should be allowed universally.

Monty is in an uproar here, funny thing is I am confident he is ok with other versions of discrimination.

Let's guess that he's a hypocrite instead of talking about how terrible this policy will be. Great contribution, bro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman
#44
#44
Also... if you're in favor of a smaller, less-intrusive federal government, Trump's EO goes in exactly the opposite direction.

The so-called White House Tech Bias Reporting Tool would receive complaints and submit them to the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC would then be required to consider taking action and examine whether the complaints violated the law. The attorney general would also be directed to create a working group that assesses content moderation practices from social media companies.

Could you imagine the number of complaints that would be filed every time Twitter, Facebook, Volnation, whatever alters a post, and someone gets their panties in a wad? If the FTC were obligated to act on each complaint, the man-hours required to simply cross that first hurdle are mind-numbing. And what about international posters? Are they also able to use this new American Bias Reporting Tool on Twitter? Is our federal government really going to be in the business of reading a complaint filed by a teenage Sudanese Islamic Jihadist whose angry that Facebook removed his beheading videos? Is this a violation of his rights?!? This is what OUR TAX DOLLARS would be paying for.

Insanity.

Trump needs to get over it. He's so thin-skinned, he can't even deal with a 'neutral' 3rd party giving Twitter readers another viewpoint? What a puss.
 
Last edited:
#46
#46
Also... if you're in favor of a smaller, less-intrusive federal government, Trump's EO goes in exactly the opposite direction.

The so-called White House Tech Bias Reporting Tool would receive complaints and submit them to the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC would then be required to consider taking action and examine whether the complaints violated the law. The attorney general would also be directed to create a working group that assesses content moderation practices from social media companies.

Could you imagine the number of complaints that would be filed every time Twitter, Facebook, Volnation, whatever alters a post? If the FTC were obligated to act on each complaint, the man-hours required to simply cross that first hurdle are mind-numbing.
VolMav would bankrupt Freak
 
#47
#47
Which they are free to do. Think about it this way, would you be within your rights to get someone to leave your business if they came and started speaking against your business? The answer is yes. Social media is a set of digital business. They can more or less police things as they see fit.

That's why I brought up that people just need to create their own Social media platform.

Its business baby.
What do you think will happen with Facebook,Twitter and Youtube if down the road the US Supreme Court rules in favor of President Trump and other Conservative groips?
 
#49
#49
THIS. If Trump doesn't like Twitter, by all means - start something else. "Trumpster". Whatever. Trump and his merry band of merry morons can create the greatest echo chamber of pure, unadulterated lies and stupidity ever! Would LOVE to see this for amusement purposes only, naturally.

So you’re for banning all discrimination laws?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tennesseefan2019

VN Store



Back
Top