TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#701
#701
Grand Vol said:
Didn't get those 3 million in the States she needed to.

Set your Trump hatred to the side for a moment and tell me you really wanted to see her in the White House. The old saying goes where there's smoke, there's fire. And her house was blazing with corruption and scandals even without the GOP getting involved.

Be objective for a moment and imagine another 2016 race. Would you have still voted for Hillary in say a Rubio-Clinton race? Or a Kasich-Clinton race? Hold your nose and vote for her in partisan fashion or stick to your guns of dislike and crossed party lines to vote against?
Click to expand...

I would have voted for her in any of those scenarios. I supported Bernie. I would have supported almost any democratic candidate over Clinton.(largely because I knew how unelectable she was due to the 30 year campaign against her - I recognized the irrational hatred much of America harbored.) All of that being said, I'm still MUCH more aligned with Clinton's policy objectives than I am with any republican.

If we would have been wise enough to adopt her health care initiatives in the 90's, we would currently be in vastly better shape with health care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#702
#702
Mick said:
The only person it hurt was her. When it came out she used a private server I was like "that was stupid" and wondered to myself "what is she hiding". Nothing has come out that anything she did was nefarious.
Click to expand...

You have no idea if the server was hacked or by who. So you can't say definitively it hurt no one.
 
#705
#705
davethevol said:
Are you going to be able to accept an attempted coup/treason/conspiracy against the government most likely took place and Obama and the Clintons are involved?
Click to expand...


Sure, if you are ready to accept that the confidential informant is a figment of an overeager imagination thinking about campaign contributions he'll get from the Fox viewers, and that the secret society is the third floor bowling team.

Wonder what their signal is. An upside down T, perhaps?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#706
#706
lawgator1 said:
Sure, if you are ready to accept that the confidential informant is a figment of an overeager imagination thinking about campaign contributions he'll get from the Fox viewers, and that the secret society is the third floor bowling team.

Wonder what their signal is. An upside down T, perhaps?
Click to expand...

You figured it out.
 
#707
#707
Mick said:
The only person it hurt was her. When it came out she used a private server I was like "that was stupid" and wondered to myself "what is she hiding". Nothing has come out that anything she did was nefarious.
Click to expand...

The GOP played the server card too early. Now they will be unable to look at her "private" emails if there is anything to the Uranium One investigation. That was their main objective from the beginning and still has the base pining to know what was in them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#708
#708
Mick said:
Oh horses**t. Comey did not admit she was guilty of anything. In Fact he recommended no charges filed. WTF do you smoke other than weed. Crackhead.
Click to expand...

As you know, this 'MATTER', was instructed to be handled 'upstairs', within the F.B.I...dude, the fix was in.

Now, let's take a look at what Brigadier General, U.S. Army (Ret)and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice suggested almost 2.5 years ago (looks like he called it 'spot on', and to heck with the law):

Eight Laws Hillary Clinton Could Be Indicted | The Daily Caller

Indictment?

The old adage, that a good prosecutor can get a ham sandwich indicted, is bad news for any public servant who risks the compromise of classified information or otherwise violates any of the other federal criminal statutes listed above. Specifically, this Administration has a history of vigorously prosecuting and winning convictions in the mishandling of classified information and other criminal violations of the public trust.

However, Hillary Clinton is anything but a ham sandwich; and she knows it. She and her senior aides will not even be formally investigated by this Justice Department, much less indicted. The president will allow Hillary Clinton and her aides to “tough it out” for as long it is politically possible. However, if and when the political and public opinion costs of a “tough it out” tactic become too great, President Obama will simply use that famous pen of his to issue a succinct pardon and make formal mockery of the concept of equal justice.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#710
#710
luthervol said:
That's pretty funny. It's you and your side continually yapping about how Clinton is so unique in how she gets away with everything even though she is the most corrupt politician in our lifetime. Talk about your lunatic logic.

Clinton handled her emails as well or better than 50% of the politicians of that time. The Clinton hatred that goes to the core of the right's very essence was 30 years in the making by the right wing propaganda machine. It will be studied by future propagandists as the greatest success in history.
Click to expand...

I said lock em all up. What do you not understand? And it doesn't change the fact that your logic is feces.
 
#711
#711
Orange_Crush said:
Holy crap. Even you have to see how desperate you sound.
Click to expand...

They really do sound desperate, don’t they? Their fantasy world is about to come crashing down, and the rest of us will be lucky if our Republic survives this attempted coup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#713
#713
Mick said:
My response was to someone that said Comey said she was guilty and I proved that to be an untruth. Not my fault you jumped in on his false assertion.
Click to expand...

I was s part of that conversation and the greater conversation was that he claimed she committed the crimes. In any case, you proved just how desperate you are by doubling down on such nonsensical semantics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#714
#714
It's recently been rumored by sources that this is a bombshell of finds that the IG Horowitz has unearthed over the past year. Allegedly what we've heard is the tip of the iceberg...guess we'll see what's made public, and action, if any, that pursue.

IG report on Clinton email case, document dump could hold new year bombshells | Fox News


Hillary-Clinton-e1458105257806.jpg
 
#715
#715
davethevol said:
They really do sound desperate, don’t they? Their fantasy world is about to come crashing down, and the rest of us will be lucky if our Republic survives this attempted coup.
Click to expand...

Im not so sure. I mostly lurk in these threads and it seems most people (on both sides) are more swept up in the political drama...like a real, live soap opera...than they are desperate for the "truth".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#716
#716
Orange_Crush said:
I was s part of that conversation and the greater conversation was that he claimed she committed the crimes. In any case, you proved just how desperate you are by doubling down on such nonsensical semantics.
Click to expand...

Still waiting on the charges of a crime that she is guilty of. Until then the burden of proof has rested on public perception. Don't you understand that? When someone goes around saying "Comey said she was guilty" that is a desperate lie even though you have already proclaimed her guilt. You are just desperate for someone to reaffirm you beliefs. Got it. Good.
 
#718
#718
McDad said:
Im not so sure. I mostly lurk in these threads and it seems most people (on both sides) are more swept up in the political drama...like a real, live soap opera...than they are desperate for the "truth".
Click to expand...

Can't handle the truth.
 
#720
#720
Mick said:
My response was to someone that said Comey said she was guilty and I proved that to be an untruth. Not my fault you jumped in on his false assertion.
Click to expand...

Comey, you're FIRED !

In a three-page letter, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein wrote that he "cannot defend the Director's handling of the conclusion of the investigation of Secretary Clinton's emails, and I do not understand his refusal to accept the nearly universal judgment that he was mistaken."

Read the full letter below:

White House Fires James Comey


Trump-fires-Comey.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#721
#721
lawgator1 said:
Sure, if you are ready to accept that the confidential informant is a figment of an overeager imagination thinking about campaign contributions he'll get from the Fox viewers, and that the secret society is the third floor bowling team.

Wonder what their signal is. An upside down T, perhaps?
Click to expand...

:crazy:
 
#722
#722
Mick said:
Still waiting on the charges of a crime that she is guilty of. Until then the burden of proof has rested on public perception. Don't you understand that? When someone goes around saying "Comey said she was guilty" that is a desperate lie even though you have already proclaimed her guilt. You are just desperate for someone to reaffirm you beliefs. Got it. Good.
Click to expand...

Yep. Pre desperation. Carry on.
 
#723
#723
luthervol said:
I would have voted for her in any of those scenarios. I supported Bernie. I would have supported almost any democratic candidate over Clinton.(largely because I knew how unelectable she was due to the 30 year campaign against her - I recognized the irrational hatred much of America harbored.) All of that being said, I'm still MUCH more aligned with Clinton's policy objectives than I am with any republican.

If we would have been wise enough to adopt her health care initiatives in the 90's, we would currently be in vastly better shape with health care.
Click to expand...

LOL, even after Bernie was cheated out of the nomination, you still hold party allegiance.

You do realize the DNC stays in power because people like you vote blindly down party line, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#724
#724
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#725
#725
Grand Vol said:
LOL, even after Bernie was cheated out of the nomination, you still hold party allegiance.

You do realize the DNC stays in power because people like you vote blindly down party line, right?
Click to expand...

Where is the power? President? House? Senate? Supreme Court? I'm going to have to ask you to define power.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top