GV strikes me as one of the few here on the right side of the political spectrum who would accept damning findings against the Trump campaign, if they were proven by Mueller, and call for Trump's ouster. Should that come to pass.
I sense in him a suspicion that there is more to it than Trump and the WH have so far admitted and that it is possible that collusion or obstruction, or some related activity, criminal or otherwise, will warrant letting go of Trump. For GV, that is married to a healthy skepticism, I get that. But he would I imagine admit he has questions and some doubt about whether Trump's categorical denials to date are legit.
There are many others here who I have no doubt would simply refuse to accept it.
GV strikes me as one of the few here on the right side of the political spectrum who would accept damning findings against the Trump campaign, if they were proven by Mueller, and call for Trump's ouster. Should that come to pass.
I sense in him a suspicion that there is more to it than Trump and the WH have so far admitted and that it is possible that collusion or obstruction, or some related activity, criminal or otherwise, will warrant letting go of Trump. For GV, that is married to a healthy skepticism, I get that. But he would I imagine admit he has questions and some doubt about whether Trump's categorical denials to date are legit.
There are many others here who I have no doubt would simply refuse to accept it.
GV strikes me as one of the few here on the right side of the political spectrum who would accept damning findings against the Trump campaign, if they were proven by Mueller, and call for Trump's ouster. Should that come to pass.
I sense in him a suspicion that there is more to it than Trump and the WH have so far admitted and that it is possible that collusion or obstruction, or some related activity, criminal or otherwise, will warrant letting go of Trump. For GV, that is married to a healthy skepticism, I get that. But he would I imagine admit he has questions and some doubt about whether Trump's categorical denials to date are legit.
There are many others here who I have no doubt would simply refuse to accept it.
GV strikes me as one of the few here on the right side of the political spectrum who would accept damning findings against the Trump campaign, if they were proven by Mueller, and call for Trump's ouster. Should that come to pass.
I sense in him a suspicion that there is more to it than Trump and the WH have so far admitted and that it is possible that collusion or obstruction, or some related activity, criminal or otherwise, will warrant letting go of Trump. For GV, that is married to a healthy skepticism, I get that. But he would I imagine admit he has questions and some doubt about whether Trump's categorical denials to date are legit.
There are many others here who I have no doubt would simply refuse to accept it.
Haha.
Its okay, you can admit it: you have doubts about Trump's sincerity on this.
Tell you what, the interesting thing will be how malevolent it was, versus nincompoop driven. For example, Don Jr. met with Russians hoping to get dirt on HRC.
An argument can be made that he is so abjectly retarded that he did not realize that was maybe a bad thing to do do and he ought to get some legal advice, first. Sr. might make the same argument -- "I didn't know that collusion was wrong at the time."
And then he can say something about Clinton or Obama sucking.
Trump, despite his objections to the matter, is now a politician.
None of them can be trusted.
So?Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit - The New York Times
Here we go (maybe). 177 days...max
Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit - The New York Times
Here we go (maybe). 177 days...max
Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit - The New York Times
Here we go (maybe). 177 days...max
That's the most hilarious part. He's always been a politician at heart, yet he managed to convince the electorate that he wasn't. Look at his history. He's flip flopped on issues repeatedly over his life. He goes for whatever gives his brand an edge, because he's ultimately in it for himself and no one else. It's no different now that he's president.