TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#1,626
#1,626
Grand Vol said:
So, it doesn't matter that others are saying the memo should be released.

You won't accept it regardless. Just say you aren't falling for those meddling GOP tricksters.
Click to expand...

Without knowing what's in it - I don't have a problem with it being released. Nunes has just been too obvious with his agenda. He hasn't even pretended to be an objective investigator which is a problem when you are the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,627
#1,627
BowlBrother85 said:
Without knowing what's in it - I don't have a problem with it being released. Nunes has just been too obvious with his agenda. He hasn't even pretended to be an objective investigator which is a problem when you are the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
Click to expand...

Funny, Comey pretended to be an objective investigator.

How'd that turn out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#1,628
#1,628
BowlBrother85 said:
Without knowing what's in it - I don't have a problem with it being released. Nunes has just been too obvious with his agenda. He hasn't even pretended to be an objective investigator which is a problem when you are the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
Click to expand...

As far as I've seen everyone in here would like to see it and have stated as much on both sides. Let them sort it out on the hill.
 
#1,629
#1,629
Grand Vol said:
So, it doesn't matter that others are saying the memo should be released.

You won't accept it regardless. Just say you aren't falling for those meddling GOP tricksters.
Click to expand...

They can't accept any collusion on the part of the FBI or DOJ because it would derail their entire agenda and they will be left with nothing. It will take a while to sink in.
 
#1,632
#1,632
If it is okay to declassify the contents of the memo, why can't they declassify the whole thing?

THAT is something that I would be interested in. I understand the Dems have put together their own memo.

So, what we have is a pissing match to see two groups come up with some explosive, half baked truths for the sole purpose of pushing their narratives.

Nunes is particularly suspect and lacks credibility. The process by which he even had the memo written was flawed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,634
#1,634
Yep, the memo could give away the secrets of Roswell and the shooter on the grassy knoll and it'll be discarded by the left.
 
#1,635
#1,635
Mick said:
As far as I've seen everyone in here would like to see it and have stated as much on both sides. Let them sort it out on the hill.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Sounds like...

(a) there are findings,
(b) they are not good, and
(c) no one can say they are fabricated.

Let’s stop the BS and #ReleaseTheMemo.
 
#1,637
#1,637
Vol0725 said:
Agreed. Sounds like...

(a) there are findings,
(b) they are not good, and
(c) no one can say they are fabricated.

Let’s stop the BS and #ReleaseTheMemo.
Click to expand...

We'll just have to wait on that (c) part. This is a creation of Nunes we're talking about. What I have seen from Dems who have read it, is that he has cherry picked information and taken things out of context. Based on his history, it will not be taken at face value by anyone who is not a Republican.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,638
#1,638
vol66 said:
If it is okay to declassify the contents of the memo, why can't they declassify the whole thing?

THAT is something that I would be interested in. I understand the Dems have put together their own memo.

So, what we have is a pissing match to see two groups come up with some explosive, half baked truths for the sole purpose of pushing their narratives.

Nunes is particularly suspect and lacks credibility. The process by which he even had the memo written was flawed.
Click to expand...

How so?

I do agree, I'd love for the info the memo was generated from to be released.
 
#1,639
#1,639
BowlBrother85 said:
We'll just have to wait on that (c) part. This is a creation of Nunes we're talking about. What I have seen from Dems who have read it, is that he has cherry picked information and taken things out of context. Based on his history, it will not be taken at face value by anyone who is not a Republican.
Click to expand...

If the memo is as damning to the DNC as I think it might be, of course they will claim those things.
 
#1,641
#1,641
hog88 said:
What? You mean they're not going to just up and say "got us"?
Click to expand...

Nope, as soon as the memo is released and Fox News gets within sight of any Democrat Congresscritter:

01_FUNNY-CAT-MEME.jpg
 
#1,642
#1,642
hog88 said:
How so?

I do agree, I'd love for the info the memo was generated from to be released.
Click to expand...

This was the footnote at the bottom of the DOJ letter to Nunes.


The terms of access stipulated that review of the
documents would be limited to the Chairman or his designee, the Ranking Member or his designee, and two staff members each. (Mr. Gowdy reviewed the documents for the majority. Mr. Schiff reviewed the documents for the
minority.)
Click to expand...
 
#1,644
#1,644
BowlBrother85 said:
We'll just have to wait on that (c) part. This is a creation of Nunes we're talking about. What I have seen from Dems who have read it, is that he has cherry picked information and taken things out of context. Based on his history, it will not be taken at face value by anyone who is not a Republican.
Click to expand...

Great, bring out all the truth
 
#1,645
#1,645
Grand Vol said:
If the memo is as damning to the DNC as I think it might be, of course they will claim those things.
Click to expand...

...and the Dems should remind everyone of Nunes' antics last March. He has never separated himself as a surrogate of the White House. He said he was meeting sources at the White House who had already provided him with his information, switching cabs on the way, holding an impromptu press conference and basically making a big fool of himself. He has zero integrity and that needs to be emphasized above all else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,646
#1,646
BowlBrother85 said:
We'll just have to wait on that (c) part. This is a creation of Nunes we're talking about. What I have seen from Dems who have read it, is that he has cherry picked information and taken things out of context. Based on his history, it will not be taken at face value by anyone who is not a Republican.
Click to expand...

66 just posted that only Shiff for the Dems got to see the background info so how can these other Dems say Nunes took things out of context?
 
#1,647
#1,647
BowlBrother85 said:
...and the Dems should remind everyone of Nunes' antics last March. He has never separated himself as a surrogate of the White House. He said he was meeting sources at the White House who had already provided him with his information, switching cabs on the way, holding an impromptu press conference and basically making a big fool of himself. He has zero integrity and that needs to be emphasized above all else.
Click to expand...

Yes, his antics were bad but the info turned out to be correct.
 
#1,650
#1,650
BowlBrother85 said:
...and the Dems should remind everyone of Nunes' antics last March. He has never separated himself as a surrogate of the White House. He said he was meeting sources at the White House who had already provided him with his information, switching cabs on the way, holding an impromptu press conference and basically making a big fool of himself. He has zero integrity and that needs to be emphasized above all else.
Click to expand...

Most Dems refused to read it. Plausible deniability?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top