luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,755
- Likes
- 19,770
How might one interpret, "no factual inaccuracies"?
Is that to be discounted, being that it remained at an onsite secure location?
Pertenant to article piece below:
Two senior FBI officials have now reviewed a controversial Republican staff memo alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 presidential campaign, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News adding that the officials could not point to any factual inaccuracies.
The two officials one from the bureaus counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division followed up after an initial review of the memo during a rare Sunday trip to Capitol Hill by FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Oh sure.
He's completely open minded about it.
Please.
Someone else's comments on Twitter are not my comments.
I simply shared the tweet.
2 + 2 = 4
I apologize if I have treated you like I treat some of the others in here. I could be mistaken but I don't think you are vicious toward the ones that don't share your view; but just a word of caution about posting tweets, Don't be Rickey Bobby.
You realize this is from CBS News Chief WH correspondent?...Not the spawn of satan, Fox News
Originally Posted by Vol0725 View Post
Per @MajorCBS: Two administration sources say the Nunes memo is being reviewed today by representatives from DOJ, FBI, NSA, and ODNI. President Trump has not seen the memo.
According to admin sources @realDonaldTrump has NOT seen #GOPMemo - review of House Intel GOP document jointly overseen by NSC/WH Counsel office - DOJ, NSA, FBI, DNI involved. Recommendation skedded for Weds p.m. Full release not certain; other options being weighed.
Still struggling to understand how democratic elections are handled in the US, I see.
If you only knew.
Another interesting (albeit meaningless) fact. The 19 states (plus DC) that Trump did not carry have a higher combined GDP than the 31 states Trump carried.