Trump's tax returns to be released to the Dems...

[Zues1]

If Trump croaked tonight would the dims finally STFU about him?
Probably not.

 

[BreatheUT]

You have proof of those accusations?

Your apoplectic hatred of Trump is hilarious

He plagiarized that line from the Biden Crime Family moniker. If he was a business he'd lag 20 years behind the nearest competitor on technology and first to market.

 

[GroverCleveland]

The dems will be hoisted by this petard soon enough. Ways and Means turns over in January.

The tax returns will be leaked before then.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

I'd be more interested in seeing Hunter Biden's tax returns. That would actually tell you something.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

Does anyone believe that Biden's tax returns show the illicit money that his son gave him on his tax returns? After all, the "big guy" didn't really earn the money, so he shouldn't have to pay taxes on it right?

No doubt the cash is sitting in a shell company owned by the Biden Crime Family and won’t hit anybody’s1040 until the coast is clear.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

I'd be more interested in seeing Hunter Biden's tax returns. That would actually tell you something.

AND the Obama’s for 2016 - 2021. When the “book deals” are cashed out.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Yes, Eric Holder set the precedent

No ... Like with just about every orchestrated hindrance to oversight, the precedent was set with Nixon.

 

[C-south]

No ... Like with just about every orchestrated hindrance to oversight, the precedent was set with Nixon.

And selectively ignored for certain ones.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

No ... Like with just about every orchestrated hindrance to oversight, the precedent was set with Nixon.

Seriously. Why do you care about this? Do you seriously think they are going to find anything illegal, or do you just think you will find something embarrassing to Trump?

 

[hog88]

No ... Like with just about every orchestrated hindrance to oversight, the precedent was set with Nixon.

Kleindienst was convicted of contempt of congress and even disbarred under a R administration, Holder faced no consequences so the precedent was set under Obama’s term.

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

The law says that the Treasury Secretary “shall furnish” the records requested by the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Committee on Finance and the Joint Committee on Taxation. Now the law has been tested and affirmed by the SC. There is no restriction on the person or particular type of return. They just have to "want it". Standby for the Republican Ways and Means to request all kinds of returns from a variety democrats and related parties. Congrats.

You still don't get it. Frumpy is the ONLY one who's tax records were not available to the public, as an elected public official. Everyone elses has been publicly available for decades.

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

The best part is when you believed he actually filed a 1040. Make it stop!

All he has to do was use taxslayer, and all this could have been avoided. Tax filing websites have been sending users’ financial information to Facebook

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

Never forget. Peter Thiel is the devil.

 

[Electric Orange]

If Trump croaked tonight would the dims finally STFU about him?
Probably not.

Probably be another impeachment.

 

[0nelilreb]

You still don't get it. Frumpy is the ONLY one who's tax records were not available to the public, as an elected public official. Everyone elses has been publicly available for decades.

What you and many don’t get is .. it doesn’t matter one way or another . They will be leak soon , then you and millions of others that don’t have a clue what they mean will go searching for your preferred news source to watch them lining up “ experts “ to tell us what this “ could mean , should mean , possible could be “ to end up with a final summary of “ of course there’s no way to tell with what we have here “ . Smh

 

[Majors]

The standard is not legality. It's whether average folks voting based on inflation, but who paid $5k in taxes last year, will be bothered by the Billionaire paying nothing.

I’m troubled by politicians like Pelosi doing insider trading. Than I am billionaires paying taxes with loopholes made by politicians doing the insider trading.

 

[UT_VOLS13]

[QUOTE="Zues1, post: 22097858, member: 19489"]If Trump croaked tonight would the dims finally STFU about him?
Probably not.[/QUOTE]
100% NO

 

[0nelilreb]

I’m troubled by politicians like Pelosi doing insider trading. Than I am billionaires paying taxes with loopholes made by politicians doing the insider trading.

See you just misunderstand the term , it’s only called insider trading for anyone not in congress . If you are in Congress , it’s just called being financially savvy .

 

[Majors]

See you just misunderstand the term , it’s only called insider trading for anyone not in congress . If you are in Congress , it’s just called being financially savvy .

Visa scandal was well before Trump the candidate. The fact she milked almost 20 more years shows the left doesn't really care about the taxes.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

Probably be another impeachment.

Probably not. They’d lose his votes going forward.

 

[Ernest T. Vol]

Good way to attack political rivals and it will be used regularly now.

Exactly, but I suspect they will change the law so they will not be subjected to the same rules. As it currently stands, the Ways and Means can have any return no matter the intent. Nancy Peolosi's statement on the matter after the ruling: "Now, the Congress must enact legislation requiring presidents and candidates for president to disclose their tax returns." Notice she doesnt say anyone or any return as it is now. Why come up with legislation if they already have the power? Because, after they get Trumps, they will limit the power to just presidents.

 

[hog88]

Exactly, but I suspect they will change the law so they will not be subjected to the same rules. As it currently stands, the Ways and Means can have any return no matter the intent. Nancy Peolosi's statement on the matter after the ruling: "Now, the Congress must enact legislation requiring presidents and candidates for president to disclose their tax returns." Notice she doesnt say anyone or any return as it is now. Why come up with legislation if they already have the power? Because, after they get Trumps, they will limit the power to just presidents.

I don’t see how her proposed legislation would be constitutional.

You know his returns will be leaked, think there will be an investigation and prosecution?

 

[Ernest T. Vol]

I don’t see how her proposed legislation would be constitutional.

You know his returns will be leaked, think there will be an investigation and prosecution?

Leak? It is illegal to release tax returns, but I expect they will have a half-ass vote to release some sort of public summary. A summary of info they choose, by the way.

 

[hog88]

Leak? It is illegal to release tax returns, but I expect they will have a half-ass vote to release some sort of public summary. A summary of info they choose, by the way.

Of course there will be a selective summary released but I have no doubt there will be leaks. Selective and twisted leaks but there will be leaks long before an official release is made.

 

[Orangeburst]

Leak? It is illegal to release tax returns, but I expect they will have a half-ass vote to release some sort of public summary. A summary of info they choose, by the way.

That is what Maggie Habberman and Butch are for.