TrumPutinGate

#3,951
#3,951
LouderVol said:
are you willing to ruin the lives of 305 million so that 25 million can have a better life for a decade or so? However long the collapse takes?

we can't spend our way out of these problems.
Click to expand...

As soon as you're willing to ruin the lives of 324 million so that less than 1 million superwealthy can have an even better life for a decade or so? However long the collapse takes?

We can't tax cut for the wealthy out of these problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,952
#3,952
volprof said:
As soon as you're willing to ruin the lives of 324 million so that less than 1 million superwealthy can have an even better life for a decade or so? However long the collapse takes?

We can't tax cut for the wealthy out of these problems.
Click to expand...

I agree. only cutting spending will solve the issues. Its why I don't vote either D or R. neither one of them cares about actually solving issues.

and you know when the collapse happens the super wealthy will get even wealthier right? all it does it get rid of whatever middle class there was.
 
#3,953
#3,953
volprof said:
As soon as you're willing to ruin the lives of 324 million so that less than 1 million superwealthy can have an even better life for a decade or so? However long the collapse takes?

We can't tax cut for the wealthy out of these problems.
Click to expand...

I'm definitely not percenter, but I appreciate you think so highly of me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,960
#3,960
volfanjustin said:
Wolf Blitzer: Do you believe, do you have evidence that there was in fact collusion between Trump associates and Russia during the campaign?

Senator Diane Feinstein: Not at this time
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/20committee/status/860261313485910019

Haha!

Odds are she wouldn't say so anyhow. Only a handful have been willing to go that far, and, while I don't mind hearing it, it's inappropriate at best. If I were a congressman, as much as it would please me to know that MAGA is done, I would not disclose any of that information either.
 
#3,961
#3,961
Hearing from multiple sources that around 30-something (one source said 28 to 40-something) individuals are currently under FBI investigation regarding Donny-Russia.

Granted, being under investigation doesn't mean charges or convictions, but, my ole' my does this look more and more like Watergate 2.0 by the day.

[Now comes obligatory 'Loaf Sr. "your sources know nothing even though you keep being right" response.]
 
#3,962
#3,962
volprof said:
Hearing from multiple sources that around 30-something (one source said 28 to 40-something) individuals are currently under FBI investigation regarding Donny-Russia.

Granted, being under investigation doesn't mean charges or convictions, but, my ole' my does this look more and more like Watergate 2.0 by the day.

[Now comes obligatory 'Loaf Sr. "your sources know nothing even though you keep being right" response.]
Click to expand...

"Donny is making public, information he was given about an on going investigation. This is illegal and both Donny and members of the FBI should be charged"-VolProf

Also VolProf:

"Inside sources are telling me they're investigating 28-40 people"

So for the record:

It's terrible, illegal, and people should be fired for it; unless the person in question is VolProf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#3,963
#3,963
volprof said:
Hearing from multiple sources that around 30-something (one source said 28 to 40-something) individuals are currently under FBI investigation regarding Donny-Russia.

Granted, being under investigation doesn't mean charges or convictions, but, my ole' my does this look more and more like Watergate 2.0 by the day.

[Now comes obligatory 'Loaf Sr. "your sources know nothing even though you keep being right" response.]
Click to expand...

Your so called sources are idiots. Meatloaf sales are going thru the damn roof.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#3,964
#3,964
Vol8188 said:
"Donny is making public, information he was given about an on going investigation. This is illegal and both Donny and members of the FBI should be charged"-VolProf

Also VolProf:

"Inside sources are telling me they're investigating 28-40 people"

So for the record:

It's terrible, illegal, and people should be fired for it; unless the person in question is VolProf
Click to expand...

I'm not in government or in the military. Nor am I disclosing information pertaining to an ongoing investigation of either my associates or myself.

Read less Ayn Rand. It would do you some good.
 
#3,965
#3,965
AirVol said:
Your so called sources are idiots. Meatloaf sales are going thru the damn roof.
Click to expand...

The only person I think that is an "idiot" is the person who looks at all the available information on Team Donny and is convinced nothing at all warrants looking further into.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,966
#3,966
volprof said:
I'm not in government or in the military. Nor am I disclosing information pertaining to an ongoing investigation of either my associates or myself.

Read less Ayn Rand. It would do you some good.
Click to expand...

What does being in the government or military have to do with it? If it's a crime to release information about an on going investigation, how did you come across the information and why are you releasing it to the public?

Lol if you believe my libertarian views have anything to do with my comments above, then you truly don't understand libertarianism even slightly.
 
#3,967
#3,967
Vol8188 said:
What does being in the government or military have to do with it? If it's a crime to release information about an on going investigation, how did you come across the information and why are you releasing it to the public?

Lol if you believe my libertarian views have anything to do with my comments above, then you truly don't understand libertarianism even slightly.
Click to expand...

You need to check up on laws pertaining to the release of classified information before you come in here bucksnorting.

And I didn't think your comments had anything to do with libertarianism. I just told you that as extra, unsolicited advice that will do you a lot of good.
 
#3,968
#3,968
volprof said:
You need to check up on laws pertaining to the release of classified information before you come in here bucksnorting.

And I didn't think your comments had anything to do with libertarianism. I just told you that as extra, unsolicited advice that will do you a lot of good.
Click to expand...

Do you mean like the fact that unlike you, the president can actually released classified info if he decides to?

So once again:

How'd you get this information, criminal?
 
#3,969
#3,969
Vol8188 said:
Do you mean like the fact that unlike you, the president can actually released classified info if he decides to?

So once again:

How'd you get this information, criminal?
Click to expand...

A civilian can release classified information that he has not stolen without prosecution. How in the heck do you think journalists so often publish such leaks while never going to prison?

A sitting president, even a fake one, can declassify information when he chooses. (On that you're right.)

A sitting president, even a fake one, however, cannot reveal information pertaining to an ongoing investigation, like Donny did.

Not that any of it matters. The party of nihilism won't do anything about it anyhow. They're currently using him as their wrecking ball in their ongoing project to kill Americans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,970
#3,970
As your daily reminder, Watergate was 27 months between crime and resignation.

We're currently in Month 10 of a far larger, far worse scandal involving crimes against the American state and the American people.

But, just as then, justice and the rule of law will persevere.

Nixon’s name was mentioned only in passing in the 50-page, 13-count indictment, but although he was not referred to specifically in any of the 45 “overt acts” alleged in the conspiracy, two of those acts occurred at White House meetings at which Nixon apparently was present.

More ominously for Nixon, grand jury foreman Vladimir Pregelj, a government worker from Washington, also turned over to Federal District Judge John J. Sirica a “sealed report” and a locked and bulging briefcase crammed with grand jury evidence, part of which reportedly related to Nixon’s alleged involvement in the coverup.

Sirica accepted the secret report and evidence, but did not say whether he would keep it or turn it over to the House Judiciary Committee for use in its impeachment inquiry.
Click to expand...

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...cts-watergate-break-in-1974-article-1.2129087
 
Last edited:
#3,971
#3,971
volprof said:
A civilian can release classified information that he has not stolen without prosecution. How in the heck do you think journalists so often publish such leaks while never going to prison?

A sitting president, even a fake one, can declassify information when he chooses. (On that you're right.)

A sitting president, even a fake one, however, cannot reveal information pertaining to an ongoing investigation, like Donny did.

Not that any of it matters. The party of nihilism won't do anything about it anyhow. They're currently using him as their wrecking ball in their ongoing project to kill Americans.
Click to expand...

Why can he not reveal such information?
 
#3,972
#3,972
volprof said:
As your daily reminder, Watergate was 27 months between crime and resignation.

We're currently in Month 10 of a far larger, far worse scandal involving crimes against the American state and the American people.

But, just as then, justice and the rule of law will persevere.



http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...cts-watergate-break-in-1974-article-1.2129087
Click to expand...

One party spying on another for political gain? Perhaps, watergate isn't the best comparison for your side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,973
#3,973
Vol8188 said:
One party spying on another for political gain? Perhaps, watergate isn't the best comparison for your side.
Click to expand...

Yes, one party spying on another indeed.

Spying on one party and its candidate, as well as using hacked voter registries from a hostile intelligence service to target prospective swing voters.

Indeed.

By the way, if you're so worried about the legality of my "leaks," then I'd be pissing myself right now if I were you.
 
#3,974
#3,974
Vol8188 said:
Why can he not reveal such information?
Click to expand...

I'm not going to do this with you again after this, so this is going to be the last time.

A sitting president, even a fake one, cannot reveal classified information pertaining to an ongoing investigation. In this case, an ongoing FISA investigation.

End of sentence. Period.
 
#3,975
#3,975
volprof said:
Yes, one party spying on another indeed.

Spying on one party and its candidate, as well as using hacked voter registries from a hostile intelligence service to target prospective swing voters.

Indeed.

By the way, if you're so worried about the legality of my "leaks," then I'd be pissing myself right now if I were you.
Click to expand...

How many months until the 27 mark? I want to know how many democrats will resign for illegally spying on their opposition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top