TrumPutinGate

#3,976
#3,976
volprof said:
I'm not going to do this with you again after this, so this is going to be the last time.

A sitting president, even a fake one, cannot reveal classified information pertaining to an ongoing investigation. In this case, an ongoing FISA investigation.

End of sentence. Period.
Click to expand...

Why can he not? Do you have a statue you can quote?
 
#3,979
#3,979
Hey VP, do your sources say that Susan Rice is refusing to testify because of a Russian collusion? Please get this info for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,980
#3,980
AirVol said:
Hey VP, do your sources say that Susan Rice is refusing to testify because of a Russian collusion? Please get this info for me.
Click to expand...

My sources say she's refusing to allow Republican nihilists to turn what should be investigations into Russia into investigations of the Obama national security team's perfectly legal inquiries so that they can obfuscate treason.
 
#3,981
#3,981
volprof said:
My sources say she's refusing to allow Republican nihilists to turn what should be investigations into Russia into investigations of the Obama national security team's perfectly legal inquiries so that they can obfuscate treason.
Click to expand...

Dems - we need to get all the information.

GOP - Susan Rice sought to unmask US citizens caught up in intelligence gathering.

Dems - we didn't mean all the information; we meant just information that supports our case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#3,982
#3,982
volinbham said:
Dems - we need to get all the information.

GOP - Susan Rice sought to unmask US citizens caught up in intelligence gathering.

Dems - we didn't mean all the information; we meant just information that supports our case.
Click to expand...

Every analyst and insider that has looked into this has said it was perfectly legitimate and legal. Perfectly routine.

But whatever helps you sleep at night to avoid the inevitable.

Speaking of that, more suspect news from Team Treason:

The project Iadonisi was engaged in for Trump’s campaign focused on social media, according to a person with knowledge of the arrangement. What that work consisted of — and why his company was not disclosed as a vendor in campaign finance reports — remains a mystery.

The Trump campaign did not report any payments to Iadonisi or his firms. However, Federal Election Commission reports show that the Trump campaign paid $200,000 on Dec. 5 for “data management services” to Colt Ventures, a Dallas-based venture-capital firm that is an investor in VizSense, a social-media company co-founded by Iadonisi.

The Washington Post made repeated inquiries to Iadonisi and other VizSense officials, but none responded to requests for comment.
Click to expand...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...a_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b213a5c46438

At least Susan Rice has actually commented, multiple times.
 
#3,985
#3,985
volprof said:
Every analyst and insider that has looked into this has said it was perfectly legitimate and legal. Perfectly routine.

But whatever helps you sleep at night to avoid the inevitable.

Speaking of that, more suspect news from Team Treason:



https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...a_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b213a5c46438

At least Susan Rice has actually commented, multiple times.
Click to expand...

I haven't said it was illegitimate. She's willing to speak on TV about what she did - why not to the committee?

The accusation is some form of collusion. There is no doubt that the outgoing administration has advocated that position so it is entirely relevant to getting to the facts to talk to people involved in the situation.

The argument that both the GOP and the Dems didn't invite her is the lamest excuse I've ever heard. Committees don't work that way.

Let's see what she has to say - ultimately we just want to gain deeper understanding on the issue right?

If speaking on TV counts or to interview then aren't we done here since Team Trump has also already spoken on the issue?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,986
#3,986
volinbham said:
I haven't said it was illegitimate. She's willing to speak on TV about what she did - why not to the committee?

The accusation is some form of collusion. There is no doubt that the outgoing administration has advocated that position so it is entirely relevant to getting to the facts to talk to people involved in the situation.

The argument that both the GOP and the Dems didn't invite her is the lamest excuse I've ever heard. Committees don't work that way.

Let's see what she has to say - ultimately we just want to gain deeper understanding on the issue right?

If speaking on TV counts or to interview then aren't we done here since Team Trump has also already spoken on the issue?
Click to expand...

She only goes where she will get softball questions and will be allowed to lie and get away with it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,987
#3,987
Presumably as NSA she has relevant info; particularly since she directly involved herself.

If we want to get all the information her testimony is entirely legit to the issue. It's not like Dems on the committee don't get to ask her questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,988
#3,988
volprof said:
My sources say she's refusing to allow Republican nihilists to turn what should be investigations into Russia into investigations of the Obama national security team's perfectly legal inquiries so that they can obfuscate treason.
Click to expand...

What act of treason do the Dems think was committed? Were secure documents transferred? Secret plans revealed? Conspiracies planned? You think Trump helped Putin release information on the DNC? What did he do push the transfer button? Now, on the other hand releasing secure information to the press is a felony. That person needs to be outed and arrested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,989
#3,989
My god, the corruption with this group of mobsters is just staggering.

Makes Hillary and Bill look trivial.
 
#3,990
#3,990
IPleadInsanity said:
What act of treason do the Dems think was committed? Were secure documents transferred? Secret plans revealed? Conspiracies planned? You think Trump helped Putin release information on the DNC? What did he do push the transfer button? Now, on the other hand releasing secure information to the press is a felony. That person needs to be outed and arrested.
Click to expand...

Jesus H.

I've spent nearly the whole entirety of the past year researching the Trump Crime Family and locating solid sources.

Whatever information you seek, it's all already here.
 
#3,992
#3,992
Carl Pickens said:
.
Click to expand...

There's another one whose "time in the barrel" is coming.

GCHQ appears to have him on tape, both with Donny and with Assange.

Taking down this merry band of traitors to the West will be the greatest triumph of our lifetimes.

Well, some of us, I guess. Some of us I suppose it will be a great big sad.
 
#3,993
#3,993
volprof said:
My sources say she's refusing to allow Republican nihilists to turn what should be investigations into Russia into investigations of the Obama national security team's perfectly legal inquiries so that they can obfuscate treason.
Click to expand...

Why do you keep up this my sources charade? Do you really think anyone believes you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,994
#3,994
BigOrangeTrain said:
Why do you keep up this my sources charade? Do you really think anyone believes you?
Click to expand...

No, I don't, but, then again, you guys aren't the brightest bulbs in the pack.

For the record, my "sources" are easily accessible to all. Not like I'm secretly communicating with FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ people. It's all on Twitter, from people who are communicating with FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ people. And I trust them, because they're just about always right in revealing things that do indeed come to pass. Have been for months now, and, in the case of one of them, for years now. That's why I said the other day that Twitter is the "Woodward and Bernstein" of TrumPutin Gate, which I imagine elicited a good chuckle out of a few.
 
Last edited:
#3,995
#3,995
volprof said:
No, I don't, but, then again, you guys aren't the brightest bulbs in the pack.

For the record, my "sources" are easily accessible to all. Not like I'm secretly communicating with FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ people. It's all on Twitter, from people who are communicating with FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ people. And I trust them, because they're just about always right in revealing things that do indeed come to pass. Have been for months now, and, in the case of one of them, for years now.
Click to expand...

Yes, yes our glorious intelligence agencies are just the model of trustworthy efficiency aren't they? If your sources are communicating with them, then you had better prepare for disappointment.

And the DOJ and FBI? What upstanding agencies they are right? And what can be said about twitter? I mean you and velo are like twitter junkies. You cannot wait for another tweet and you believe every word of it as if it was irrefutable fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,996
#3,996
BigOrangeTrain said:
Yes, yes our glorious intelligence agencies are just the model of trustworthy efficiency aren't they? If your sources are communicating with them, then you had better prepare for disappointment.

And the DOJ and FBI? What upstanding agencies they are right? And what can be said about twitter? I mean you and velo are like twitter junkies. You cannot wait for another tweet and you believe every word of it as if it was irrefutable fact.
Click to expand...

It could always be worse.

I could be a poster who claims he would not regret supporting treason.
 
#3,997
#3,997
Plus, I like constantly referring to them as "my sources" or "a source tells me" just to drive the treason apologists on here nuts.

It's pretty effective too.
 
#4,000
#4,000
BigOrangeTrain said:
Yes, yes our glorious intelligence agencies are just the model of trustworthy efficiency aren't they? If your sources are communicating with them, then you had better prepare for disappointment.

And the DOJ and FBI? What upstanding agencies they are right? And what can be said about twitter? I mean you and velo are like twitter junkies. You cannot wait for another tweet and you believe every word of it as if it was irrefutable fact.
Click to expand...

Best in the world.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top