TrumPutinGate

#3,929
#3,929
if we can leave volprofs fantasy land for a little while, how the hell are Anthony Weiner, Hume Abedin and Hillary Clinton not on trial?


“Somehow, her emails were being forwarded to Anthony Weiner, including classified information,” Comey said. He later added, “His then-spouse, Huma Abedin, appears to have had a regular practice of forwarding emails to him for him to print out for her so she could deliver them to the secretary of state.”
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,937
#3,937
volfanjustin said:
if we can leave volprofs fantasy land for a little while, how the hell are Anthony Weiner, Hume Abedin and Hillary Clinton not on trial?
Click to expand...

That is a very good question and one that the FBI and Comey must account for.

But for now, we have a far greater threat to rid ourselves of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,939
#3,939
#3,941
#3,941
Wolf Blitzer: Do you believe, do you have evidence that there was in fact collusion between Trump associates and Russia during the campaign?

Senator Diane Feinstein: Not at this time
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,943
#3,943
volfanjustin said:
Wolf Blitzer: Do you believe, do you have evidence that there was in fact collusion between Trump associates and Russia during the campaign?

Senator Diane Feinstein: Not at this time
Click to expand...

I was wondering how long it would take one of your gaggle to cite this as some sort of proof that nothing happened.

I was literally laughing at the CNN panel debating it afterwards, as if that meant there was still nothing to see in the investigation.

Here's a newsflash for you and that CNN panel: most who know there is collusion aren't going to say so anyhow. Further, there are at least two congress people (who would likely know) on record saying there is evidence of collusion, a far greater step than saying that one has seen no evidence of collusion. Plus, there is at least one congress person on record that we're likely going to see arrests from this, which is, again, a far greater step than saying there are no signs of likely arrests.

Maybe it's just me, but I tend to take the ones who say there is (rather than the ones who say there isn't) much more seriously, for the simple facts I listed above.
 
#3,944
#3,944
volprof said:
I was wondering how long it would take one of your gaggle to cite this as some sort of proof that nothing happened.

I was literally laughing at the CNN panel debating it afterwards, as if that meant there was still nothing to see in the investigation.

Here's a newsflash for you and that CNN panel: most who know there is collusion aren't going to say so anyhow. Further, there are at least two congress people (who would likely know) on record saying there is evidence of collusion, a far greater step than saying that one has seen no evidence of collusion. Plus, there is at least one congress person on record that we're likely going to see arrests from this, which is, again, a far greater step than saying there are no signs of likely arrests.

Maybe it's just me, but I tend to take the ones who say there is (rather than the ones who say there isn't) much more seriously, for the simple facts I listed above.
Click to expand...

Of course you do because you are paid to and you have already made your mind up.

You and these congressman should contact her because as a ranking member on the judiciary and select committee on intelligence she should have all this info that you have that she is missing
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,945
#3,945
volfanjustin said:
Of course you do because you are paid to and you have already made your mind up.

You and these congressman should contact her because as a ranking member on the judiciary and select committee on intelligence she should have all this info that you have that she is missing
Click to expand...

MAGA is going down, and not a moment too soon.

I don't care if Feinstein says no collusion yet. Means absolutely nothing.
 
#3,946
#3,946
volprof said:
I was wondering how long it would take one of your gaggle to cite this as some sort of proof that nothing happened.

I was literally laughing at the CNN panel debating it afterwards, as if that meant there was still nothing to see in the investigation.

Here's a newsflash for you and that CNN panel: most who know there is collusion aren't going to say so anyhow. Further, there are at least two congress people (who would likely know) on record saying there is evidence of collusion, a far greater step than saying that one has seen no evidence of collusion. Plus, there is at least one congress person on record that we're likely going to see arrests from this, which is, again, a far greater step than saying there are no signs of likely arrests.

Maybe it's just me, but I tend to take the ones who say there is (rather than the ones who say there isn't) much more seriously, for the simple facts I listed above.
Click to expand...

this is another example of why you have no objectivity and why I can't take your side of the investigation too seriously. That's not saying I don't take the investigation seriously; just your constant outcries.

Righteous or not its a witch hunt and to defend America you are willing to tear down one of the pillars of its creation. Innocence until guilt is proven in a court of law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,947
#3,947
LouderVol said:
this is another example of why you have no objectivity and why I can't take your side of the investigation too seriously. That's not saying I don't take the investigation seriously; just your constant outcries.

Righteous or not its a witch hunt and to defend America you are willing to tear down one of the pillars of its creation. Innocence until guilt is proven in a court of law.
Click to expand...

First part, whatever. That's your opinion.

Second part, I'm not saying go ahead and imprison the guy. Sure, give him a trial. Even traitors deserve fair trials and then to promptly be escorted to a prison cell in a very fair manner.
 
#3,949
#3,949
volfanjustin said:
only thing that is going down is your saviors only legislative victory
Click to expand...

Quite possibly. That and 25 million Americans' healthcare and roughly half of Americans with family members with pre-existing conditions who will all completely forget this come 2018 I'm sure.

Donny will be gone by then anyhow. In 2018, it will merely be about getting rid of those who sanctioned his treachery. And we will.
 
#3,950
#3,950
volprof said:
Quite possibly. That and 25 million Americans' healthcare and roughly half of Americans with family members with pre-existing conditions who will all completely forget this come 2018 I'm sure.

Donny will be gone by then anyhow. In 2018, it will merely be about getting rid of those who sanctioned his treachery. And we will.
Click to expand...

are you willing to ruin the lives of 305 million so that 25 million can have a better life for a decade or so? However long the collapse takes?

we can't spend our way out of these problems.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top