TrumPutinGate

[theFallGuy]

That's not true... HRC has said that there were altered e-mails. She reiterated that again today.

as if she's believable,


The Clinton campaign, however, has yet to produce any evidence that any specific emails in the latest leak were fraudulent. We asked the campaign, and they directed us to various news reports about the DNC hack, government concerns that Russia might fake evidence of voter fraud, and fake news sites spreading false information about the WikiLeaks emails

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...inton-wikileaks-emails-doctored-or-are-they-/

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

Or, stated another way, it allowed the minority to rule over the majority

How many of those majority were illegal voters?

 

[37L1]

Another falsehood from the Trump apology train.

You are incorrect. Go read the transcript.

MMMkay.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd-BfTMPeFE

"Not in my experience, because it would be a big deal to tell the FBI to stop doing something without appropriate purpose. We’re oftentimes — they give us opinions that we don’t see a case there, and so you ought to stop investing resources in it, but I’m talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal. It’s not happened in my experience."

 

[TheDeeble]

MMMkay.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd-BfTMPeFE

"Not in my experience, because it would be a big deal to tell the FBI to stop doing something without appropriate purpose. We’re oftentimes — they give us opinions that we don’t see a case there, and so you ought to stop investing resources in it, but I’m talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal. It’s not happened in my experience."

He was asked about Attorney General or Senior officials at the Department of Justice.

I still haven't seen a video where Comey is asked about Trump or the White House.

Just sayin.....that quote could be seen as out of context.

 

[FLVOL69]

That's not true... HRC has said that there were altered e-mails. She reiterated that again today.

I call BS

 

[hog88]

I'm offended.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/jmclaughlinSAIS/status/870110260773736448[/twitter]

Why? Both of them have been caught in lies.

 

[hog88]

That's not true... HRC has said that there were altered e-mails. She reiterated that again today.

Yet she never produced an original to compare.

 

[tumscalcium]

That's not true... HRC has said that there were altered e-mails. She reiterated that again today.

Oh well that settles it. Hillary Clinton doesn't lie.


Hahahahahahahahahahahah

 

[Rifleman]

HRC's ideas about the technical aspects, of anything really, have been proven to be no more sophisticated than the average grandma still surfing WebTV.

 

[luthervol]

Don't forget about Bush who "lost" 22 million e-mails.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/george-w-bush-white-house-lost-22-million-emails-497373.html

 

[Hayezb]

Because there is no chance at all that some of those hacked e-mails were altered.... Right!

DKIM Verification.

 

[Obsessed]

Don't forget about Bush who "lost" 22 million e-mails.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/george-w-bush-white-house-lost-22-million-emails-497373.html

But but but Bushhhhhh

 

[GAVol]

Don't forget about Bush who "lost" 22 million e-mails.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/george-w-bush-white-house-lost-22-million-emails-497373.html

Most of those emails were recovered and archived.

 

[hog88]

HRC's ideas about the technical aspects, of anything really, have been proven to be no more sophisticated than the average grandma still surfing WebTV.

And some here wanted a technically unsophisticated grandma as POTUS.

 

[Velo Vol]

No way.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/CNBCi/status/870246925932560385[/twitter]

 

[Velo Vol]

Flashback:

Farage goes to the Ecuadorian embassy and can't remember why he was there, while still there:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/marieleconte/wait-what?utm_term=.fxmN81LKb#.gwoOj7Jwx

What are these rascals up to?

 

[lawgator1]

.

 

[Grand Vol]

One is fake news

And the other has Alex Jones.

 

[golfballs]

No way.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/CNBCi/status/870246925932560385[/twitter]

Lol

In the next episode of "everyone Trump knows is a Russian agent"

 

[theutvolunteers]

Is Louise still going on about "President Hatch"?

 

[theutvolunteers]

Lol

In the next episode of "everyone Trump knows is a Russian agent"

It's reaching levels of hilarity never seen before.

 

[Rifleman]

And some here wanted a technically unsophisticated grandma as POTUS.

Now we have a grandpa who can't even be trusted with a text box and a 140 character limit.

This was the worst lose/lose situation since . . . ok, I can't think of one.

Grant vs. Greeley in 1872? Nah, doesn't come close. Grant liked to drink but could you blame him at that point?

McGovern/Nixon in 1972? Would take either of those over Trump or Hillary right now.

 

[luthervol]

It's reaching levels of hilarity never seen before.

Agreed, but I'm not sure we're catching the same punch line.

 

[VOLatile]

Spicer said they will no longer hear questions about Russia.

That's really going to end this once and for all. /s

 

[hog88]

Now we have a grandpa who can't even be trusted with a text box and a 140 character limit.

This was the worst lose/lose situation since . . . ok, I can't think of one.

Grant vs. Greeley in 1872? Nah, doesn't come close. Grant liked to drink but could you blame him at that point?

McGovern/Nixon in 1972? Would take either of those over Trump or Hillary right now.

This we agree on.

If we only could have had a "none of the above" option with a do-over.