TrumPutinGate

#8,056
#8,056
SIAP but isn't it interesting that Jeh Johnson testified that the DNC would not cooperate in the hacking investigation then Debbie WTF Schultz gives an interview saying that's BS and no one from the FBI, DHS or other agency contacted them until a year after they knew about the hacking.

We have Lynch directing Comey to call the email investigation a "matter" and we have the WH shutting down Comey's plan to go public in the early Summer of last year with the news that Russia was trying to interfere with the election process.

http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417

Sure looks like the previous administration played this on the down low thinking HC would win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#8,057
#8,057
Hang Trump by his balls on the front lawn of the WH for just winning a fair and decent election but don't do a thing about the real corruption that went on from within the previous Democratic Administration and it's DNC base being in bed w/the media telling lies of cover-up deception of their criminal activities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#8,058
#8,058
volinbham said:
SIAP but isn't it interesting that Jeh Johnson testified that the DNC would not cooperate in the hacking investigation then Debbie WTF Schultz gives an interview saying that's BS and no one from the FBI, DHS or other agency contacted them until a year after they knew about the hacking.

We have Lynch directing Comey to call the email investigation a "matter" and we have the WH shutting down Comey's plan to go public in the early Summer of last year with the news that Russia was trying to interfere with the election process.

http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417

Sure looks like the previous administration played this on the down low thinking HC would win.
Click to expand...

Be careful, VB. You're coming dangerously close to putting the pieces together.
 
#8,060
#8,060
Grand Vol said:
Be careful, VB. You're coming dangerously close to putting the pieces together.
Click to expand...

Hope Mueller is...

Given these new revelations the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting takes on some new significance: more to discuss than just ye ole email scandal.

Just a theory to chew on - Team Obama wanted all talk of Russian attempts to interfere to be quiet until after Hillary won. Then when inevitably it had to come out that Russia was being naughty and sought to undermine the confidence in our election system, they go full bore on Trump collusion with a Clinton DOJ leading the way. Erase any doubt Russia disrupted the election and all the efforts were aimed at helping Trump.

Makes as much sense (more?) as believing Trump and Putin colluded to win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#8,063
#8,063
volinbham said:
Hope Mueller is...

Given these new revelations the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting takes on some new significance: more to discuss than just ye ole email scandal.

Just a theory to chew on - Team Obama wanted all talk of Russian attempts to interfere to be quiet until after Hillary won. Then when inevitably it had to come out that Russia was being naughty and sought to undermine the confidence in our election system, they go full bore on Trump collusion with a Clinton DOJ leading the way. Erase any doubt Russia disrupted the election and all the efforts were aimed at helping Trump.

Makes as much sense (more?) as believing Trump and Putin colluded to win.
Click to expand...

The only thing I'm concerned about with the Mueller inquiry is the amount of former Clinton workers and supporters that are on the panel now. It seems far more like a witch hunt with the majority of the panel being comprised of political opponents.

Not saying that's the actual case, but given the gravity of what the investigation could potentially bring forth, you'd think Mueller would be more selective about who he brings in.
 
#8,064
#8,064
volinbham said:
Hope Mueller is...

Given these new revelations the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting takes on some new significance: more to discuss than just ye ole email scandal.

Just a theory to chew on - Team Obama wanted all talk of Russian attempts to interfere to be quiet until after Hillary won. Then when inevitably it had to come out that Russia was being naughty and sought to undermine the confidence in our election system, they go full bore on Trump collusion with a Clinton DOJ leading the way. Erase any doubt Russia disrupted the election and all the efforts were aimed at helping Trump.

Makes as much sense (more?) as believing Trump and Putin colluded to win.
Click to expand...

Could be plausible. Good way to rally their base thinking Hillary won an election that was slanted against her from the beginning due to outside interference and under a "fair" election she would have won by millions more votes.

Reminds me of this:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=539uvCQBvZY[/youtube]
 
#8,072
#8,072
Grand Vol said:
The only thing I'm concerned about with the Mueller inquiry is the amount of former Clinton workers and supporters that are on the panel now. It seems far more like a witch hunt with the majority of the panel being comprised of political opponents.

Not saying that's the actual case, but given the gravity of what the investigation could potentially bring forth, you'd think Mueller would be more selective about who he brings in.
Click to expand...

Right off the GOP talking points.

Mueller is a good man, but (hedge your bets)....

I cannot recall a more blatant display of waiting on results to pick a side.

Investigation concludes no wrongdoing? Mueller is fantastic!! Brilliant. Honest. Thorough.

Investigation finds fault? He's a plant. Partisan. Not to be trusted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#8,074
#8,074
lawgator1 said:
Right off the GOP talking points.

Mueller is a good man, but (hedge your bets)....

I cannot recall a more blatant display of waiting on results to pick a side.

Investigation concludes no wrongdoing? Mueller is fantastic!! Brilliant. Honest. Thorough.

Investigation finds fault? He's a plant. Partisan. Not to be trusted.
Click to expand...

lol

I'm certainly not one for original thought or anything. I would add more, but I haven't been emailed the daily answers to liberal questions by the Party yet. I'll have to reply tomorrow.
 
#8,075
#8,075
SIAP

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/t...ades-from-the-media-headlines/article/2626994

David Brooks, another columnist for the Times who spends his days Googling mental disorders to diagnose Trump with, admitted this week that it's "striking how little evidence there is that any underlying crime occurred — that there was any actual collusion between the Donald Trump campaign and the Russians."

Aw jeez, sorry velo, luther and you other libs. I guess you will have to find some other straw to grasp. You guys look like complete tools at this point. But keep up the fight :eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top