TrumPutinGate

Is that a question or a statement?
Lots of people defended him. I never said they were racist, you did. I don't think I've ever called anyone racist on this board.

No, you have a lame revolving answer. You never actually answered the question. I'm trying to figure out your code.
 
Having just relived a lot of the OJ story over the past couple of days, I realized that the people who defended OJ's innocence and the people defending Trump's innocence are relying on much the same emotion and logic. It's as if they're opposite sides of the same coin.

Here's the original post. Everyone has their own opinion about the people who felt OJ was innocent. I'm just stating that I personally see amazing similarities between the OJ and Trump defenders.....with regards to emotion and logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Here's your "answer".

I think it's a great answer. I tried to word it carefully. I'm not going to draw conclusions for anyone. When I do, the conclusions have a tendency to be immediately discounted primarily strictly due to the source (me). When one is allowed to discover their own answer, it's a lot more meaningful than just having someone say "here's the answer".
 
I think it's a great answer. I tried to word it carefully. I'm not going to draw conclusions for anyone. When I do, the conclusions have a tendency to be immediately discounted primarily strictly due to the source (me). When one is allowed to discover their own answer, it's a lot more meaningful than just having someone say "here's the answer".

By "carefully" you danced.
 
In a post a few days back I said you are FOS. I retract that statement and sincerely apologize for it. The cogitation you demonstrate in this particular post is why I later said I would rather have you running the country than the Donald Duck in charge now.

Carry on.

I realize once you actually open your mind and don't drink the liberal cool ade, you'll find yourself being almost as smart as I am.
 
By the way, Trump has said, more than once, that he was not aware of Junior's meeting with the Russian lawyer--two Russians, actually. Trump is obviously lying. Why? Well, for one thing, during his interview with the New York Times Trump began to acknowledge that he was aware of it and then caught himself and declared that he was not aware. Kind of a giveaway. Second, what are the odds that a Russian (Trump's favorite country and leader) would schedule a meeting with Trump's son during the campaign, promising information on Clinton, a meeting that both Manafort and Kushner would attend, and none of them said anything about it to Trump beforehand? Neither his son or his son-in-law or his campaign manager (another friend of Russia). The odds that that happened are ZERO. Trump would have been told immediately, which means that he's lying....again.

He's painted into a corner now
 
A prosecutor who isn't friends with a person involved in the investigation who had hired a team full of Clinton supporters.

By this standard Trump would be disqualified from investigating himself.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/GuardianRover/status/888516749225730048[/twitter]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

VN Store



Back
Top