TrumPutinGate

#13,504
#13,504
FLVOL69 said:
Any more predictions Nostradamus ? Your side hasn't got it right yet..😂
Click to expand...

The lack of understanding you guys show regarding statistics is amusing. If Hillary had a 90% chance of winning, that means she had a 10% of not winning. The 10% chance has a 1 in 10 chance of happening. It happened.

If you had a bag of 10 marbles with 9 blue marbles and one red marble and were told that if you drew the red marble you would win $1000, you would be thinking you had a decent chance of winning a $1000. If you drew a red marble, that would not indicate that the other 9 marbles were not blue but rather you were just lucky enough to pull the one you had hoped; which will happen one out of ten times.

The continued effort to use Trump's victory as a way to discount true scientific data is asinine. Either you know that and are just using it as an excuse to discount what you don't want to hear, or you don't know that which means you're completely ignorant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#13,505
#13,505
luthervol said:
The lack of understanding you guys show regarding statistics is amusing. If Hillary had a 90% chance of winning, that means she had a 10% of not winning. The 10% chance has a 1 in 10 chance of happening. It happened.

If you had a bag of 10 marbles with 9 blue marbles and one red marble and were told that if you drew the red marble you would win $1000, you would be thinking you had a decent chance of winning a $1000. If you drew a red marble, that would not indicate that the other 9 marbles were not blue but rather you were just lucky enough to pull the one you had hoped; which will happen one out of ten times.

The continued effort to use Trump's victory as a way to discount true scientific data is asinine. Either you know that and are just using it as an excuse to discount what you don't want to hear, or you don't know that which means you're completely ignorant.
Click to expand...

It's got nothing to do with science, it's about you and your sides inability to correctly predict anything associated with Trump or his administration..
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9803.jpg
    IMG_9803.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 0
#13,506
#13,506
FLVOL69 said:
It's got nothing to do with science, it's about you and your sides inability to correctly predict anything associated with Trump or his administration..
Click to expand...

So completely ignorant then?

Plus I correctly predicted his first 200 days would be a chaotic embarrassment.....leading to forced or voluntary removal from office within the first 18 months.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#13,509
#13,509
FLVOL69 said:
Any more predictions Nostradamus ? Your side hasn't got it right yet..��
Click to expand...

Without even looking, I'd wager that your facebook/chain-email picture is wildly inaccurate citing polls showing 90% probability "the day before the election."

Edit: Yep, polling showed a 2% polling edge https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html#polls

You may want to start vetting your facebook political pictures for accuracy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#13,511
#13,511
FLVOL69 said:
Not off FB nitz, are you being disingenuous again or is Alzheimer's setting in?
Click to expand...

Based on the usage here - I genuinely wonder if you understand what disingenuous means.

I'd say stick to pictures but unfortunately it would seem that they are as inaccurate as your word choices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#13,512
#13,512
Also, note that this "raid" happened over a month ago, and according to Washington Posts' MUH sources, recovered documents that he had already turned over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#13,513
#13,513
Septic said:
Based on the usage here - I genuinely wonder if you understand what disingenuous means.

I'd say stick to pictures but unfortunately it would seem that they are as inaccurate as your word choices.
Click to expand...

If you prefer liar I can go that route too, I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt.
 
#13,516
#13,516
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#13,517
#13,517
From the attached link:

..."FBI agents executed a search warrant at one of Mr. Manafort's residences. Mr. Manafort has consistently cooperated with law enforcement and other serious inquiries and did so on this occasion as well."...
 
#13,518
#13,518
Orangedogsrule said:
From the attached link:

..."FBI agents executed a search warrant at one of Mr. Manafort's residences. Mr. Manafort has consistently cooperated with law enforcement and other serious inquiries and did so on this occasion as well."...
Click to expand...



That quote was from Manafort aide Jason Maloni. What did you expect them to say?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#13,522
#13,522
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
A big F U would be more correct.....:) that would've been right out of the Dems playbook.
Click to expand...

I believe F-U is what Manafort was saying to Mueller when he didn't turn over everything to begin with. It doesn't bode well that they had to get a search warrant to obtain it. If he claims he turned everything over and didn't he's looking at an obstruction charge on top of whatever else they may have on him. I expect this guy to turn into a canary very soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#13,523
#13,523
MT LeConte said:
I believe F-U is what Manafort was saying to Mueller when he didn't turn over everything to begin with. It doesn't bode well that they had to get a search warrant to obtain it. If he claims he turned everything over and didn't he's looking at an obstruction charge on top of whatever else they may have on him. I expect this guy to turn into a canary very soon.
Click to expand...

Not much into LE stuff are you?

All one needs for a search warrant is the reasonable belief a specific item is located at a specific place. There doesn't need to be ironclad proof it's there. However, there must be a justifiable probable cause to grant the warrant. But you can still search and not find anything.

Now, the real question is, they searched the house, what items did they come up with? I haven't seen an article yet that says they seized anything.
 
#13,524
#13,524
MT LeConte said:
I believe F-U is what Manafort was saying to Mueller when he didn't turn over everything to begin with. It doesn't bode well that they had to get a search warrant to obtain it. If he claims he turned everything over and didn't he's looking at an obstruction charge on top of whatever else they may have on him. I expect this guy to turn into a canary very soon.
Click to expand...

What does everything mean? His receipts from Lowes? His cable bill? Did he have cabbage in his fridge? Could that be the smoking gun for collusion?!? :crazy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#13,525
#13,525
MT LeConte said:
I believe F-U is what Manafort was saying to Mueller when he didn't turn over everything to begin with. It doesn't bode well that they had to get a search warrant to obtain it. If he claims he turned everything over and didn't he's looking at an obstruction charge on top of whatever else they may have on him. I expect this guy to turn into a canary very soon.
Click to expand...

The Russia story is dying in the media and they needed something to reignite the lunatic fervor, this shlt happened over two weeks ago..😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top