TrumPutinGate

#14,276
#14,276
Oh no! But obstruction is his game.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/07/trump-russia-investigation-christopher-wray-no-interference-242448

FBI Director Christopher Wray said Thursday that he has not picked up any indication that either President Donald Trump or the White House is seeking to interfere with the ongoing probe into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

“I can say very confidently that I have not detected any whiff of interference with that investigation,” Wray said during an intelligence-focused conference in Washington.
Click to expand...
 
#14,287
#14,287
MG1968 said:
Yeah, what's wrong with a little capitalism being used to foster better relations between to long-time adversaries?
Click to expand...

its someone who ran as a republican doing it and they didn't run it as a charity.

also did a deal actually happen?
 
#14,289
#14,289
MG1968 said:
Yeah, what's wrong with a little capitalism being used to foster better relations between to long-time adversaries?
Click to expand...

The only types of capitalism Russians like Putin and others are concerned about are how to divert as much money into their military and into their pockets.
 
#14,290
#14,290
In addition to Priebus, Spicer and Hicks, Mueller has notified the White House he will probably seek to question White House counsel Don McGahn and one of his deputies, James Burnham. Mueller’s office has also told the White House that investigators may want to interview Josh Raffel, a White House spokesman who works closely with Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner.

White House officials are expecting that Mueller will seek additional interviews, possibly with family members, including Kushner, who is a West Wing senior adviser, according to the people familiar with Mueller’s inquiry.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4b862b2b3f3_story.html?utm_term=.c8c6a1e2434e
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,292
#14,292
Mick said:
In addition to Priebus, Spicer and Hicks, Mueller has notified the White House he will probably seek to question White House counsel Don McGahn and one of his deputies, James Burnham. Mueller’s office has also told the White House that investigators may want to interview Josh Raffel, a White House spokesman who works closely with Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner.

White House officials are expecting that Mueller will seek additional interviews, possibly with family members, including Kushner, who is a West Wing senior adviser, according to the people familiar with Mueller’s inquiry.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4b862b2b3f3_story.html?utm_term=.c8c6a1e2434e
Click to expand...

Muller is breaking new legal ground wanting to question a lawyer of a subject under investigation. Nah, this isn't a witch hunt.
 
#14,293
#14,293
Interesting how those assured of Trump's guilt here are ignoring the Debbie Wasserman Schultz thread where there are real developments that spell bad news for her - or at least as bad of developments as envisioned here.

Not saying this will happen but there's an important link between the two - the DNC emails. Could get interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,294
#14,294
hog88 said:
Muller is breaking new legal ground wanting to question a lawyer of a subject under investigation. Nah, this isn't a witch hunt.
Click to expand...


White House counsel works for us, not for Trump. This is not unusual at all.

My guess is that the questioning of them will be very brief, and will simply be wether Donald jr. ever contacted any of them about getting their advice on that meeting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#14,296
#14,296
volinbham said:
Interesting how those assured of Trump's guilt here are ignoring the Debbie Wasserman Schultz thread where there are real developments that spell bad news for her - or at least as bad of developments as envisioned here.

Not saying this will happen but there's an important link between the two - the DNC emails. Could get interesting.
Click to expand...

You know those people in that thread are saying she belongs in jail even thought there is no evidence that she committed (insert crime here) and come over here and call this a witch hunt, conspiracy from the deep state, conspiracy from the liberal media.

Seriously you want people to go to that thread and start the same stuff that you see here. The story right now in that thread is Awan not DWS. And really the care level for DWS is almost non existent.
 
#14,297
#14,297
Mick said:
You know those people in that thread are saying she belongs in jail even thought there is no evidence that she committed (insert crime here) and come over here and call this a witch hunt, conspiracy from the deep state, conspiracy from the liberal media.

Seriously you want people to go to that thread and start the same stuff that you see here. The story right now in that thread is Awan not DWS. And really the care level for DWS is almost non existent.
Click to expand...

Sorry. But there is indeed evidence against DWS, DNC, and the clintons.

Sit back and enjoy the show.
 
#14,299
#14,299
Mick said:
You know those people in that thread are saying she belongs in jail even thought there is no evidence that she committed (insert crime here) and come over here and call this a witch hunt, conspiracy from the deep state, conspiracy from the liberal media.

Seriously you want people to go to that thread and start the same stuff that you see here. The story right now in that thread is Awan not DWS. And really the care level for DWS is almost non existent.
Click to expand...

What I was suggesting that folks like Carlos that post every little thing they can find and imagine ways it directly implicates Trump in colluding with Russia seem to ignore plenty of evidence that points to some shenanigans with DWS.

So I'm not saying she should be in jail or is guilty at this point - just saying there's some interesting evidence that in this thread is dead lock proof of the impending impeachment and imprisonment of Trump.

Finally, DWS is important because of her role leading the DNC which was found to have colluded to promote HC, had there servers hacked and apparently refused FBI assistance in the matter.

Seems objective, intellectually curious posters would treat evidence and the implications the same.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top