TrumPutinGate

#14,302
#14,302
Bjorn_Yesterday said:
He may have answered "better," but both of you finished a mile short of forming a cogent argument...typical.
Click to expand...

It's your assertion. You posted those scary Facebook ad links.

Don't be mad because YOUR argument is weak.

You'll need to bring a cogent argument to the table before you speak of anyone else.

You'd be doing better if you brought something intelligent to the table. So stupid. So typical.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,304
#14,304
tumscalcium said:
It's your assertion. You posted those scary Facebook ad links.

Don't be mad because YOUR argument is weak.

You'll need to bring a cogent argument to the table before you speak of anyone else.

You'd be doing better if you brought something intelligent to the table. So stupid. So typical.
Click to expand...

It wasn't an assertion, it was fact. You are so freaking dense...

Edit: You most certainly didn't know what "cogent" meant before I used it in a sentence. You should thank me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,305
#14,305
hog88 said:
If if if, only you had a brain.
Click to expand...


Last I checked, meeting with actual RUSSIANS who are offering dirt on Clinton--is the definition of collusion.

Here's a headline from today's New York Times:

"Russian fingerprints are on thousands of fake Facebook and Twitter accounts that posted anti-Clinton messages."

I'd link the story for you--but I'm not sure that you're intellectually suited for the New York Times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#14,307
#14,307
armchair said:
Last I checked, meeting with actual RUSSIANS who are offering dirt on Clinton--is the definition of collusion.

Here's a headline from today's New York Times:

"Russian fingerprints are on thousands of fake Facebook and Twitter accounts that posted anti-Clinton messages."

I'd link the story for you--but I'm not sure that you're intellectually suited for the New York Times.
Click to expand...

Again...is that illegal? According to legal eagle Alan Dershowitz, its not illegal.

Edit: Dershowitz isn't a southerner either. So suck on that.
 
#14,308
#14,308
Bjorn_Yesterday said:
It wasn't an assertion, it was fact. You are so freaking dense...

Edit: You most certainly didn't know what "cogent" meant before I used it in a sentence. You should thank me.
Click to expand...

The fact is hillary lost because of Russian Facebook ads? Damn, you all are pathetic losers. Lol
 
Last edited:
#14,310
#14,310
armchair said:
Last I checked, meeting with actual RUSSIANS who are offering dirt on Clinton--is the definition of collusion.

Here's a headline from today's New York Times:

"Russian fingerprints are on thousands of fake Facebook and Twitter accounts that posted anti-Clinton messages."

I'd link the story for you--but I'm not sure that you're intellectually suited for the New York Times.
Click to expand...

We must be using different dictionaries.

Definition of collusion

: secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose
Click to expand...

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collusion
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,314
#14,314
armchair said:
Last I checked, meeting with actual RUSSIANS who are offering dirt on Clinton--is the definition of collusion.

Here's a headline from today's New York Times:

"Russian fingerprints are on thousands of fake Facebook and Twitter accounts that posted anti-Clinton messages."

I'd link the story for you--but I'm not sure that you're intellectually suited for the New York Times.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the belly laugh this morning.

I usually discard your comments, but this part was hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,316
#14,316
armchair said:
Last I checked, meeting with actual RUSSIANS who are offering dirt on Clinton--is the definition of collusion.

Here's a headline from today's New York Times:

"Russian fingerprints are on thousands of fake Facebook and Twitter accounts that posted anti-Clinton messages."

I'd link the story for you--but I'm not sure that you're intellectually suited for the New York Times.
Click to expand...

What about the thousands of Facebook messages and Twitter accounts posted by Trump supporters? 😂
 
#14,317
#14,317
tumscalcium said:
It was your excuse.
Click to expand...

No it wasn't.

Bjorn_Yesterday said:
What you're too dumb to realize is that I've never said Russian intervention cost Hillary the election outright.

I'm pointing out obvious, confirmed instances of Russian intervention. I am leading you to truth. You're a horse and I'm leading you to water. Tums, you're too dumb to drink the water.
Click to expand...


No way you didn't ride the short bus to school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,318
#14,318
Bjorn_Yesterday said:
Facebook says fake accounts linked to Russia bought thousands of ads during US election

Facebook says it sold political ads to fake Russian accounts

I didn't spend much time on facebook during the election cycle, but I did see the massive botnet army on twitter churning out pro-Trump, anti-everyone else RT, Sputnik, and Wikileaks garbage...and of course you have the Reality Winner CIA leaks that demonstrate a Russian spearphishing campaign.

It's like I said earlier in this thread, Russia wanted to be involved...and Team Trump wanted Russia involved.
Click to expand...

It's best when all I have to do is respond with your own post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,319
#14,319
FLVOL69 said:
What about the thousands of Facebook messages and Twitter accounts posted by Trump supporters? 😂
Click to expand...

The two aren't mutually exclusive.

Thousands of fake accounts created for the purpose of swaying voters to Trump. Considering the amount of misinformation Trump supporters digested as truth, I would say it was more than enough to turn the election in Trump's favor. A misinformed public was the foundation of the trump victory, and Russia played a significant role in laying that foundation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14,320
#14,320
luthervol said:
The two aren't mutually exclusive.

Thousands of fake accounts created for the purpose of swaying voters to Trump. Considering the amount of misinformation Trump supporters digested as truth, I would say it was more than enough to turn the election in Trump's favor. A misinformed public was the foundation of the trump victory, and Russia played a significant role in laying that foundation.
Click to expand...

You still don't get it, the Russians didn't fill up the rally's or bus people to the polls. You guys are so ****ing pathetic..
 
Last edited:
#14,321
#14,321
Bjorn_Yesterday said:
No it wasn't.




No way you didn't ride the short bus to school.
Click to expand...

I'm thinking Tums may have been "home schooled". He's obviously dealing from an incomplete deck.

Not only can you not always make the horse drink the water, but occasionally there is that rare horse that can't even be lead to the water.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#14,322
#14,322
luthervol said:
I'm thinking Tums may have been "home schooled". He's obviously dealing from an incomplete deck.

Not only can you not always make the horse drink the water, but occasionally there is that rare horse that can't even be lead to the water.
Click to expand...

You were the bus driver, can you confirm or deny the allegations? 😂
 
#14,324
#14,324
FLVOL69 said:
You still don't get it, the Russians didn't fill up the rally's or bus people to the polls. You guys are so ****ing pathetic..
Click to expand...

Those people went voluntarily fueled by misinformation and ignorance. (Not all but many, certainly enough to swing the results)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top