Mick
Mr. Orange
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2013
- Messages
- 21,564
- Likes
- 9,765
It has the same rule - one party consent.
Whatever man
The people in the conversation in the restaurant talking loudly cannot expect privacy. That is common sense and was not the argument. There is no intent in this case to eavesdrop therefore no consent is required if there was a recording that was picked up in normal operation that would be allowable, but if he "intended" to eavesdrop and record that is a crime.