TrumPutinGate

#14,702
#14,702
BowlBrother85 said:
If they didn't either have proof of a crime or proof that Paul Manafort was acting as a foreign agent they would not have been able to obtain a FISA warrant.
Click to expand...

well the Justice Department should find out and while they are at it, determine the source of the felony leaks.

Once again Trump manages to prove CNN is garbage.
 
#14,706
#14,706
BigOrangeTrain said:
You have got to be joking here.
Click to expand...

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is a United States federal law which prescribes procedures for the physical and electronic surveillance and collection of "foreign intelligence information" between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign powers" suspected of espionage or terrorism. The Act created the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to oversee requests for surveillance warrants by federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. It has been repeatedly amended since the September 11 attacks.

Approval of a FISA application requires the court find probable cause that the target of the surveillance be a "foreign power" or an "agent of a foreign power", and that the places at which surveillance is requested is used or will be used by that foreign power or its agent. In addition, the court must find that the proposed surveillance meet certain "minimization requirements" for information pertaining to U.S. persons.

No, I wasn't joking... A federal court judge (very likely) found probable cause that Paul Manafort (Trump's campaign manager during the RNC) was acting as an "agent of a foreign power"... in this case, it just happens to be the same foreign power with which the Trump campaign is being investigated for colluding with during the 2016 Presidential campaign. What a coincidence.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#14,709
#14,709
BowlBrother85 said:
If they didn't either have proof of a crime or proof that Paul Manafort was acting as a foreign agent they would not have been able to obtain a FISA warrant.
Click to expand...

Investigation into Manafort is going on 4 years now, it's time to **** or get off the pot.
 
#14,712
#14,712
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,715
#14,715
luthervol said:
That's a uniquely interesting take. Most found Bharara to be one of the more effective and respected US District attorneys.
Click to expand...

1st he is an attorney.
2nd most people in his position are terminated when a new administration comes into power, this guy just wants to make it about him.
 
#14,717
#14,717
MaxamusXIII said:
Lolololol
No we're not.
This thing is distraction and is going nowhere
Click to expand...

I'm sure someone will be charged, Manafort and or Flynn willl most likely be charged with something completely unrelated to Russian collusion or the election. The Dems and their lemmings will celebrate it as some tremendous feat of justice while they use it in the 2020 campaign.
 
#14,718
#14,718
MaxamusXIII said:
Lolololol
No we're not.
This thing is distraction and is going nowhere
Click to expand...

Obviously only time will tell. If you went back through this thread from the beginning, you would see how many things that you guys claimed would never happen have already happened.

I say trump is gone within the next 302 days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,719
#14,719
luthervol said:
Obviously only time will tell. If you went back through this thread from the beginning, you would see how many things that you guys claimed would never happen have already happened.

I say trump is gone within the next 302 days.
Click to expand...

Kids and their dreams. It's cute.
 
#14,720
#14,720
luthervol said:
Obviously only time will tell. If you went back through this thread from the beginning, you would see how many things that you guys claimed would never happen have already happened.

I say trump is gone within the next 302 days.
Click to expand...

Like what?
 
#14,723
#14,723
hog88 said:
I'm sure someone will be charged, Manafort and or Flynn willl most likely be charged with something completely unrelated to Russian collusion or the election. The Dems and their lemmings will celebrate it as some tremendous feat of justice while they use it in the 2020 campaign.
Click to expand...

This is a big step for you hog. Is reality sobering you up? You've gone from nothing to see here to two Trump cronies will likely be charged with crimes. Unrelated to Russian collusion? Maybe, maybe not. But Mueller now has emails from Manafort offering briefings to Putin's pal Oleg Deripaska on nominee Tump's campaign. Those emails were sent from Manafort's Trump Campaign email address. That's a pretty strong indication that there was high level contact with the Russians during the campaign. We don't know what else Mueller may have but I suspect there's more to come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#14,724
#14,724
BowlBrother85 said:
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is a United States federal law which prescribes procedures for the physical and electronic surveillance and collection of "foreign intelligence information" between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign powers" suspected of espionage or terrorism. The Act created the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to oversee requests for surveillance warrants by federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. It has been repeatedly amended since the September 11 attacks.

Approval of a FISA application requires the court find probable cause that the target of the surveillance be a "foreign power" or an "agent of a foreign power", and that the places at which surveillance is requested is used or will be used by that foreign power or its agent. In addition, the court must find that the proposed surveillance meet certain "minimization requirements" for information pertaining to U.S. persons.

No, I wasn't joking... A federal court judge (very likely) found probable cause that Paul Manafort (Trump's campaign manager during the RNC) was acting as an "agent of a foreign power"... in this case, it just happens to be the same foreign power with which the Trump campaign is being investigated for colluding with during the 2016 Presidential campaign. What a coincidence.
Click to expand...

Do you know the difference between "proof" and "probable cause"?
 
#14,725
#14,725
hog88 said:
1st he is an attorney.
2nd most people in his position are terminated when a new administration comes into power, this guy just wants to make it about him.
Click to expand...


and it isn't since the point here is that Trump had unethical motives for firing him, your original comment about him being a bigger slimeball than Trump remains just a tiny bit off the mark....the usual quip with no basis in reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top