TrumPutinGate

[hog88]

How do you know he's not catching?

He's hauled in a couple so far...

He got two guys for lying to the FBI. He's got no one on the Russian collusion/interference, you know the thing supposedly he is investigating.

 

[hog88]

Mueller is fishing alright, and the bloated white whale is about to roll right up next to him. That he wants to interview Trump should scare the living crap out of everyone in his orbit. If there weren't blood in the water, Mueller wouldn't risk the potential political damage otherwise.

I'm a big seafood fan. Setting my table and breaking out the Old Bay spice.

Actually, Muller hasn't asked to interview Trump. But let's not let facts get in the way.

 

[hog88]

Not true. He must present questions that any answer to would be a lie.

fify

 

[Vol0725]

People said the same thing about Watergate. How many years did that take?

Hey, Trump is not my ideal role-model, but I support most of what he's doing and has done as President thus far in a brutal D.C. cesspool that he's come into as an outsider.

That said...

This is a laughable investigation, in my opinion, based on all the research I've done. But in all seriousness, if you take days to 'weed through' all the opinion-pieces and get all the facts, the Mueller investigation is now so tainted with the appearance of corruption that it has lost credibility and the public’s trust.

It’s a myth that collusion in a political campaign is a crime. It’s not. And there was never a speck of evidence that President Trump engaged in some collaboration with the Russians.

So, this was 'likely' all manufactured. It is 'possible' that it was invented by the FBI and the Department of Justice (at the top). And now we know why — because they hated Trump, they loved Hillary Clinton, they were trying to elect her and they were trying to defeat him. And when it didn’t work, they went about to Plan B.

There is strong circumstantial evidence that an insidious plot unprecedented in American history was hatched within the FBI and the Obama Justice Department to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

And when this apparent effort to improperly influence the election did not succeed, the suspected conspirators appear to have employed a fraudulent investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.

The mainstream media and Democrats dismiss talk of an anti-Trump conspiracy by the FBI and Justice Department as right-wing nonsense – paranoid fantasies of Trump supporters with no basis in facts. But there are plenty of facts that lay out a damning case based on circumstantial evidence.

Recently disclosed text messages between FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page 'suggest' there may have been two parts of the apparent anti-Trump plot.

“Part A” was to devise a way to exonerate Clinton, despite compelling evidence that she committed crimes under the Espionage Act in her mishandling of classified documents on her private email server.

Absolving Clinton cleared the way for her to continue her candidacy at a time when all polls and just about every pundit predicted she would be elected president in November 2016. If Clinton had been charged with crimes she would likely have been forced to drop her candidacy, and if she remained in the race her candidacy would have been doomed.

But “Part A” of the apparent anti-Trump plot was not enough. A back-up plan would be prudent. It seems the Obama Justice Department and FBI conjured up a “Part B” just in case the first stratagem failed. This would be even more malevolent – manufacturing an alleged crime supposedly committed by Trump where no crime exists in the law.

And so, armed with a fictitious justification, a criminal investigation was launched into so-called Trump-Russia “collusion.” It was always a mythical legal claim, since there is no statute prohibiting foreign nationals from volunteering their services in American political campaigns.

 

[lawgator1]

Hey, Trump is not my ideal role-model, but I support most of what he's doing and has done as President thus far in a brutal D.C. cesspool that he's come into as an outsider.

That said...

This is a laughable investigation, in my opinion, based on all the research I've done. But in all seriousness, if you take days to 'weed through' all the opinion-pieces and get all the facts, the Mueller investigation is now so tainted with the appearance of corruption that it has lost credibility and the public’s trust.

It’s a myth that collusion in a political campaign is a crime. It’s not. And there was never a speck of evidence that President Trump engaged in some collaboration with the Russians.

So, this was 'likely' all manufactured. It is 'possible' that it was invented by the FBI and the Department of Justice (at the top). And now we know why — because they hated Trump, they loved Hillary Clinton, they were trying to elect her and they were trying to defeat him. And when it didn’t work, they went about to Plan B.

There is strong circumstantial evidence that an insidious plot unprecedented in American history was hatched within the FBI and the Obama Justice Department to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

And when this apparent effort to improperly influence the election did not succeed, the suspected conspirators appear to have employed a fraudulent investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.

The mainstream media and Democrats dismiss talk of an anti-Trump conspiracy by the FBI and Justice Department as right-wing nonsense – paranoid fantasies of Trump supporters with no basis in facts. But there are plenty of facts that lay out a damning case based on circumstantial evidence.

Recently disclosed text messages between FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page 'suggest' there may have been two parts of the apparent anti-Trump plot.

“Part A” was to devise a way to exonerate Clinton, despite compelling evidence that she committed crimes under the Espionage Act in her mishandling of classified documents on her private email server.

Absolving Clinton cleared the way for her to continue her candidacy at a time when all polls and just about every pundit predicted she would be elected president in November 2016. If Clinton had been charged with crimes she would likely have been forced to drop her candidacy, and if she remained in the race her candidacy would have been doomed.

But “Part A” of the apparent anti-Trump plot was not enough. A back-up plan would be prudent. It seems the Obama Justice Department and FBI conjured up a “Part B” just in case the first stratagem failed. This would be even more malevolent – manufacturing an alleged crime supposedly committed by Trump where no crime exists in the law.

And so, armed with a fictitious justification, a criminal investigation was launched into so-called Trump-Russia “collusion.” It was always a mythical legal claim, since there is no statute prohibiting foreign nationals from volunteering their services in American political campaigns.

You're ok with a president who helps a foreign adversary via policy change because he owes them a personal debt, financial or political, because its not illegal ?

 

[Orange_Crush]

You're ok with a president who helps a foreign adversary via policy change because he owes them a personal debt, financial or political, because its not illegal ?

That right there...

That quote spells defeat.

 

[hog88]

You're ok with a president who helps a foreign adversary via policy change because he owes them a personal debt, financial or political, because its not illegal ?

What policy change?

 

[Vol0725]

You're ok with a president who helps a foreign adversary via policy change because he owes them a personal debt, financial or political, because its not illegal ?

Point me to evidence, please...thank you in advance for your time.

 

[Bjorn_Yesterday]

Point me to evidence, please...thank you in advance for your time.

Provide substantiating evidence for any of the crap you dumped on our heads a few posts ago.

IDGAF if you read a blog.

 

[lawgator1]

What policy change?

Point me to evidence, please...thank you in advance for your time.

Tried to stop Congress from enacting sanctions on Russia.

Has then refused to enforce them when passed.

Says he believes Putin over our own intelligence sources.

Rolling back some pre-administration limits on Russian spy posts.

Changed GOP platform to be pro Russia in Ukraine.

 

[volger]

You're ok with a president who helps a foreign adversary via policy change because he owes them a personal debt, financial or political, because its not illegal ?

Although not as president, thank God. Has that not been the Clinton's MO their entire political careers? Oh wait, Bill was president. Hmmm.

 

[Septic]

He got two guys for lying to the FBI. He's got no one on the Russian collusion/interference, you know the thing supposedly he is investigating.

If trump hasn't done anything, he should welcome an interview and investigation to fully exonerate him.

 

[Vol0725]

Provide substantiating evidence for any of the crap you dumped on our heads a few posts ago.

IDGAF if you read a blog.

Why all the IDGAF hostility there Sparky ?

 

[hog88]

Tried to stop Congress from enacting sanctions on Russia.

Has then refused to enforce them when passed.

Says he believes Putin over our own intelligence sources.

Rolling back some pre-administration limits on Russian spy posts.

Changed GOP platform to be pro Russia in Ukraine.

So the current administration disagreed with the previous administrations foreign policy. Yep, treason for sure.

 

[Vol0725]

Tried to stop Congress from enacting sanctions on Russia.

Has then refused to enforce them when passed.

Says he believes Putin over our own intelligence sources.

Rolling back some pre-administration limits on Russian spy posts.

Changed GOP platform to be pro Russia in Ukraine.

I get where your headed...Russia. Russia. Russia. Russia. Okay for the love of God he’s busted and totally in bed with Putin. Fine, you win. I give! Please no more Russia.

 

[hog88]

If trump hasn't done anything, he should welcome an interview and investigation to fully exonerate him.

Find me a lawyer that would give his client that advice.

 

[Vols_Baby_Boomer]

What crime is Trump guilty of committing? Be specific.

 

[1972 Grad]

What crime is Trump guilty of committing? Be specific.

U.S. Penal Code 69-420: Hurting the feelings of the mentally soft.

 

[luthervol]

Hey, Trump is not my ideal role-model, but I support most of what he's doing and has done as President thus far in a brutal D.C. cesspool that he's come into as an outsider.

That said...

This is a laughable investigation, in my opinion, based on all the research I've done. But in all seriousness, if you take days to 'weed through' all the opinion-pieces and get all the facts, the Mueller investigation is now so tainted with the appearance of corruption that it has lost credibility and the public’s trust.

It’s a myth that collusion in a political campaign is a crime. It’s not. And there was never a speck of evidence that President Trump engaged in some collaboration with the Russians.

So, this was 'likely' all manufactured. It is 'possible' that it was invented by the FBI and the Department of Justice (at the top). And now we know why — because they hated Trump, they loved Hillary Clinton, they were trying to elect her and they were trying to defeat him. And when it didn’t work, they went about to Plan B.

There is strong circumstantial evidence that an insidious plot unprecedented in American history was hatched within the FBI and the Obama Justice Department to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

And when this apparent effort to improperly influence the election did not succeed, the suspected conspirators appear to have employed a fraudulent investigation of President Trump in an attempt to undo the election results and remove him as president.

The mainstream media and Democrats dismiss talk of an anti-Trump conspiracy by the FBI and Justice Department as right-wing nonsense – paranoid fantasies of Trump supporters with no basis in facts. But there are plenty of facts that lay out a damning case based on circumstantial evidence.

Recently disclosed text messages between FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page 'suggest' there may have been two parts of the apparent anti-Trump plot.

“Part A” was to devise a way to exonerate Clinton, despite compelling evidence that she committed crimes under the Espionage Act in her mishandling of classified documents on her private email server.

Absolving Clinton cleared the way for her to continue her candidacy at a time when all polls and just about every pundit predicted she would be elected president in November 2016. If Clinton had been charged with crimes she would likely have been forced to drop her candidacy, and if she remained in the race her candidacy would have been doomed.

But “Part A” of the apparent anti-Trump plot was not enough. A back-up plan would be prudent. It seems the Obama Justice Department and FBI conjured up a “Part B” just in case the first stratagem failed. This would be even more malevolent – manufacturing an alleged crime supposedly committed by Trump where no crime exists in the law.

And so, armed with a fictitious justification, a criminal investigation was launched into so-called Trump-Russia “collusion.” It was always a mythical legal claim, since there is no statute prohibiting foreign nationals from volunteering their services in American political campaigns.

I give your post a D minus.

 

[Vols_Baby_Boomer]

U.S. Penal Code 69-420: Hurting the feelings of the mentally soft.

So basically Libs have gone full blown communist and now want to """investigate""" people they don't like with no evidence of any crime.

 

[luthervol]

What crime is Trump guilty of committing? Be specific.

I'm leaning towards "Crimes against humanity".

 

[Vols_Baby_Boomer]

I give your post a D minus.

hey luther, what crime(s) is Trump suspected of committing? Be specific.

 

[Vols_Baby_Boomer]

I'm leaning towards "Crimes against humanity".

Don't sign your posts.

 

[luthervol]

So basically Libs have gone full blown communist and now want to """investigate""" people they don't like with no evidence of any crime.

Can you say Kenneth Starr. The right wing repubs. thought he was some kind of god.

 

[Septic]

Find me a lawyer that would give his client that advice.

Was that the question? What advice should a lawyer give?