TrumPutinGate

#16,704
#16,704
lawgator1 said:
It's the why that matters.
Click to expand...
Let me see if I've got all this straight, because I'm a little confused.



1) Obama is super smart, and said that it wasn't possible to rig U.S. elections.

2) Trump is stupid, old, and has worsening dementia, yet he was able to rig an election.

3) Trump never wanted to actually win the election in the first place, yet......

4) Trump colluded with Russia to win the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#16,705
#16,705
Sorry I’m a little behind on this thread.

So it’s now changed from Russia hacking the election to Trump-Russia collusion to steal the election?

How exactly was the election stolen from hiLIARy?

Thanks
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#16,706
#16,706
MOOOOONEY said:
Sorry I’m a little behind on this thread.

So it’s now changed from Russia hacking the election to Trump-Russia collusion to steal the election?

How exactly was the election stolen from hiLIARy?

Thanks
Click to expand...

The list will, undoubtedly, grow as she continues talking about it.

1. Sexism

2. Racism

3. Misogyny

4. Xenophobia

5. Suburban women

6. James Comey

7. FBI

8. Russians

9. Vladimir Putin

10. WikiLeaks

11. D.N.C.

12. Barack Obama

13. Joe Biden

14. Bernie Sanders

15. Anthony Weiner

16. Electoral College

17. Polling Data

18. Cable News

19. New York Times

20. Fake News

21. Bots

22. Facebook

23. Twitter

24. Netflix

25. TV Executives

26. ‘Anti-American forces’

27. Democrat documentaries

28. Low information voters

29. People wanting change

30. People who assumed she’d win

31. Republican Party

32. “Content farms in Macedonia’

33. Infowars

34. Goosefer

35. DC Leaks

36. Jill Stein

37. Steve Bannon

38. Voter I-D laws

39. Chief Justice John Roberts

40. KS Sec. of State, Kris Kobach

41. Citizens United

42. Colluding Trump officials

43. Benghazi

44. Rep. Kevin McCarthy

45. Gen. Michael Flynn

46. Julian Assange

47. Roger Stone

48. Reddit

49. Drudge Report

50. Alex Jones

51. Russia Today (RT)

52. Sputnik Network

53. Robert Mercer

54. Koch brothers

55. NBC’S Matt Lauer

56. Fox News Channel
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#16,710
#16,710
Hayezb said:
Copying news articles and acting smart is what 75% of the PF forum is...
Click to expand...

Nah, the regulars typically make an attempt at citation.

Especially when it's a copy and paste and even if it's from the worst partisan rag available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#16,711
#16,711
lawgator1 said:
Tried to stop Congress from enacting sanctions on Russia.

Has then refused to enforce them when passed.

Says he believes Putin over our own intelligence sources.

Rolling back some pre-administration limits on Russian spy posts.

Changed GOP platform to be pro Russia in Ukraine.
Click to expand...

1. No he didn't
2. which ones? At least half went through and are being implemented without any problems. the hold ups are dealing with specific cases as far as I understand it.
3. has nothing to do with the matter at hand, Obama believed criminals before the cops.
4. this is actually genius, and one of those times it may be scary how smart Trump is. He is getting something for nothing here. His admin passes out some judgement that you say he was refusing. Russia files a complaint against them, and Trump walks some of them back. He gets to look like he cares by passing it in the first place. he then gets to look like a politician by actually working with someone else. and lastly he gives Russia something they already had and they are happy to have it. Even in this "collusion" he gave them nothing.
5. haven't actually seen any changes here in rhetoric, but I don't pay attention. I know we are still sending weapons and my reservist friend has mentioned possible deployments over there a number times.

again this is what scares me about Trump is how sneaky smart he may actually be. He runs his mouth, which costs nothing. drums up the supporters and the haters, and then does something completely different so the political aspect of what actually happens isn't bad. The more people freak out makes what little he actually does seem all that much better just because of the freak out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#16,712
#16,712
Hayezb said:
Copying news articles and acting smart is what 75% of the PF forum is...
Click to expand...

DISCLOSURE: I wrote all this below, no Copy/Paste job:

Don’t doubt that one bit. If it gets your point across, doesn’t matter...sometimes when you’re on your cell ( like I am right now) it’s allot easier to C&P than typing out longer dissertation. Although, I think it’s best to denote the source of reference when necessary. In my scenario, I didn't, it’s what H wrote in her book (besides 1 sentence)...Think we’re pickin’ corn out s*** on this here...happens sometimes, when the case is pretty much closed.
 
Last edited:
#16,715
#16,715
If Hilary won, wouldn't even be a 'SIGNIFICANT' Democratic political agenda.

This is interesting...never heard or seen this in mainstream media before.

Putin’s Rage triggered by Obama’s Moves:
Fearing meddling by U.S., Moscow now turns to ‘hybrid warfare’

“The Washington establishment drastically underestimates who started this,” a foreign diplomat with access to Mr. Putin told The Times. “It was actually Obama and Hillary, not Putin. They sent McFaul over to Russia to try and overthrow Putin, and it made him livid.”

Vladimir Putin's rage triggered by President Obama's diplomatic moves - Washington Times
 
Last edited:
#16,716
#16,716
1972 Grad said:
Let me see if I've got all this straight, because I'm a little confused.



1) Obama is super smart, and said that it wasn't possible to rig U.S. elections.

2) Trump is stupid, old, and has worsening dementia, yet he was able to rig an election.

3) Trump never wanted to actually win the election in the first place, yet......

4) Trump colluded with Russia to win the election.
Click to expand...

Let me see if I can help you through your confusion.

1. Yes - Obama is super smart but was wrong this one time.

2. Yes - to all parts (but he didn't rig it himself, he just colluded with smart people)

3. Yes - Trump did not want to win nor did he think he would win.

4. No - Trump colluded with Russia to damage Hillary as much as possible in order to hurt her ability to govern once she was inevitably elected.

I give you an 85% (so you really weren't as confused as you thought - this time).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#16,717
#16,717
luthervol said:
Let me see if I can help you through your confusion.

1. Yes - Obama is super smart but was wrong this one time.

2. Yes - to all parts (but he didn't rig it himself, he just colluded with smart people)

3. Yes - Trump did not want to win nor did he think he would win.

4. No - Trump colluded with Russia to damage Hillary as much as possible in order to hurt her ability to govern once she was inevitably elected.

I give you an 85% (so you really weren't as confused as you thought - this time).
Click to expand...

1. Agree, he could be deemed super smart...after all he's a master organizer and a smooth methodical talker; so yeah, super smart.
2. LOL
3. Not that crazy of an idea...often thought he never really intended to win.
4. LOL

I'd give you an "A", because I know your joking about Trump-Russian collusion/rigging; I know you're not that naive. Great job!
 
#16,718
#16,718
Kinda interesting...maybe it means nothing?
3 articles quoted below...


Google’s New Fact-Check Feature Almost Exclusively Targets Conservative Sites

Google, the most powerful search engine in the world, is now displaying fact checks for conservative publications in its results.

No prominent liberal site receives the same treatment.

Google’s New Fact-Check Feature Targets Conservative Sites



Interesting,never seen this site, don't approve or disprove of it... but interesting their claims below... full link follows:


"Social media giants are run by uniformly left-wing corporate media managers — and so the purge began and it continues.

Google has scrubbed its search results of sites and posts critical of jihad and sharia.

Fifteen years of work, forty thousand plus posts of mine, just disappeared from Google search.

Social media giants are run by uniformly left-wing corporate managers.

And are waging a very real war against those with whom they disagree."

Google’s New ‘Fact-Check Feature’ Targets Conservative Sites - Freedom Outpost




"I then googled the following liberal sites: Slate, Salon, Daily Kos, Media Matters For America, Occupy Democrats, MoveOn.org, ThinkProgress, Mother Jones, Vice, Vox, and The Huffington Post.

Of the eleven prominent liberal sites, only one had the fact-checking feature; Occupy Democrats. The rest only have the “topics they write about” tab."

Why Does Google’s New ‘Fact-Check’ Feature Seem to Be Targeting Conservative Sites? | Mediaite
 
Last edited:
#16,719
#16,719
Vol0725 said:
Kinda interesting...maybe it means nothing?
3 articles quoted below...


Google’s New Fact-Check Feature Almost Exclusively Targets Conservative Sites

Google, the most powerful search engine in the world, is now displaying fact checks for conservative publications in its results.

No prominent liberal site receives the same treatment.

Google’s New Fact-Check Feature Targets Conservative Sites



Interesting,never seen this site, don't approve or disprove of it... but interesting their claims below... full link follows:


"Social media giants are run by uniformly left-wing corporate media managers — and so the purge began and it continues.

Google has scrubbed its search results of sites and posts critical of jihad and sharia.

Fifteen years of work, forty thousand plus posts of mine, just disappeared from Google search.

Social media giants are run by uniformly left-wing corporate managers.

And are waging a very real war against those with whom they disagree."

Google’s New ‘Fact-Check Feature’ Targets Conservative Sites - Freedom Outpost




"I then googled the following liberal sites: Slate, Salon, Daily Kos, Media Matters For America, Occupy Democrats, MoveOn.org, ThinkProgress, Mother Jones, Vice, Vox, and The Huffington Post.

Of the eleven prominent liberal sites, only one had the fact-checking feature; Occupy Democrats. The rest only have the “topics they write about” tab."

Why Does Google’s New ‘Fact-Check’ Feature Seem to Be Targeting Conservative Sites? | Mediaite
Click to expand...

Easy and obvious conclusion:

Conservative sites are much more apt to lie and distort resulting in a greater need for fact checking. Truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#16,724
#16,724
Orange_Crush said:
There is no way you are a real person. You are an online persona.
Click to expand...

I sincerely hope that 95% of what I see on here is from online personas, otherwise, the world is indeed in sad shape.

Furthermore, if anyone thinks my leftist persona is more radical than many of the numerous right wing personas found here, then they are sadly mistaken. That image reflected in the mirror may be reversed, but it is indeed you (plural). Look closely, warts and all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#16,725
#16,725
luthervol said:
I sincerely hope that 95% of what I see on here is from online personas, otherwise, the world is indeed in sad shape.

Furthermore, if anyone thinks my leftist persona is more radical than many of the numerous right wing personas found here, then they are sadly mistaken. That image reflected in the mirror may be reversed, but it is indeed you (plural). Look closely, warts and all.
Click to expand...

Lol. If the whole world was liberal we’d all be even worse off than Venezuela.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top