TrumPutinGate

#17,851
#17,851
theFallGuy said:
Still waiting for someone to actually debate the text message about the media leak strategy. So far I've received deflections.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, BigOrangeD, 0nelilreb and 3 others
#17,852
#17,852
  • Like
Reactions: TennTom
#17,853
#17,853
theFallGuy said:
Still waiting for someone to actually debate the text message about the media leak strategy. So far I've received deflections.
Click to expand...

I don't have time to do this today, but has Sara Carter ever been right when trying to spin something up for her audience?

There are some key facts, then there is the "here's my spin".

I'd rather have the raw texts as a starting point. Post 'em if you got 'em.
 
#17,859
#17,859
evillawyer said:
And do you really think Strzok, Page and people at the DOJ would be discussing a strategy for MAKING leaks to the media? Usually, leaking is something you keep on the down-low, not something you brainstorm with sister agencies on, especially one that's charged with, you know, prosecuting leaks.
Click to expand...

I don't know which version of these events is correct but to your point Strzok has already been shown to discuss strategy with Page via these personal texts.

Of tangental relevance - we see that McCabe authorized leaks then admonished agents for doing the leaking so it's certainly feasible that someone who says they are working to stop leaking is leaking themselves.

Andrew McCabe Admonished FBI Officials For His Own Leaks

As deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe “admonished” other FBI officials over leaks he himself authorized.
That’s one of the damning revelations the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General released in a Friday report.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin, davethevol, BigOrangeD and 1 other person
#17,861
#17,861
evillawyer said:
And do you really think Strzok, Page and people at the DOJ would be discussing a strategy for MAKING leaks to the media? Usually, leaking is something you keep on the down-low, not something you brainstorm with sister agencies on, especially one that's charged with, you know, prosecuting leaks.
Click to expand...

I had literally just gone to find this phone to tell you I want to talk to you about the media leak strategy with DOJ before you go,” Strzok wrote.
Thar text came a day before the Washington Post reported that former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page had been surveilled by the FBI after the agency received a warrant from the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a move that has elicited backlash because it partly relied on details included in the unverified and so-called “Trump dossier” that contains damaging information about Trump.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and BigOrangeD
#17,864
#17,864
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, ajvol01, Hayezb and 2 others
#17,865
#17,865
Franklin Pierce said:
HOME DEPOT CO-FOUNDER CHALLENGES ROBERT MUELLER — ‘COME OUT AND SAY WHAT YOU GOT’

Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone on Wednesday called for an end to the Mueller investigation and defended Donald Trump’s legitimacy as president.

Home Depot Co-Founder Challenges Robert Mueller — ‘Come Out And Say What You Got’
Click to expand...

Oh snap! It's on like Donkey Kong now. The gauntlet has been thrown down. The co-founder of Home Depot!?!? I'm sure Mueller is shaking in his boots. He may loose that 10% federal government discount if he doesn't put up or shut up.
 
#17,866
#17,866
evillawyer said:
Oh snap! It's on like Donkey Kong now. The gauntlet has been thrown down. The co-founder of Home Depot!?!? I'm sure Mueller is shaking in his boots. He may loose that 10% federal government discount if he doesn't put up or shut up.
Click to expand...
What I cannot understrand is you still have no clue that all of this Russian Collusion stuff was cooked up by the DEMs. The evidence is staring you right in the face and yet you still refuse to see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and Franklin Pierce
#17,868
#17,868
BigOrangeD said:
What I cannot understrand is you still have no clue that all of this Russian Collusion stuff was cooked up by the DEMs. The evidence is staring you right in the face and yet you still refuse to see it.
Click to expand...
Probably because non-existent evidence doesn't stare anybody in the face. But over-active imaginations can make it seem that way.
 
#17,869
#17,869
evillawyer said:
Oh snap! It's on like Donkey Kong now. The gauntlet has been thrown down. The co-founder of Home Depot!?!? I'm sure Mueller is shaking in his boots. He may loose that 10% federal government discount if he doesn't put up or shut up.
Click to expand...
So on one hand you ridicule the public opinion of a magnate of business in our country that doesn’t agree with your stance while on the other hand you prop up a has been journalist that won’t name his sources and we just have to trust you guys that he’s right even after the people he quoted says he’s not. All because that does agree with your stance. Lol. 😂😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#17,871
#17,871
NorthDallas40 said:
So on one hand you ridicule the public opinion of a magnate of business in our country that doesn’t agree with your stance while on the other hand you prop up a has been journalist that won’t name his sources and we just have to trust you guys that he’s right even after the people he quoted says he’s not. All because that does agree with your stance. Lol. 😂😂
Click to expand...
He's a typical liberal.
 
#17,872
#17,872
NorthDallas40 said:
So on one hand you ridicule the public opinion of a magnate of business in our country that doesn’t agree with your stance while on the other hand you prop up a has been journalist that won’t name his sources and we just have to trust you guys that he’s right even after the people he quoted says he’s not. All because that does agree with your stance. Lol. 😂😂
Click to expand...
Not following that one. One is expressing an irrelevant opinion (since he has no say in when Mueller ends the investigation, much less knowledge as to what Mueller has uncovered), while the other (an incredibly well-known and well-regarded investigative journalist), is simply purporting to report actual conversations about Trump from those in his administration. How are those comparable?
 
#17,873
#17,873
evillawyer said:
Not following that one. One is expressing an irrelevant opinion (since he has no say in when Mueller ends the investigation, much less knowledge as to what Mueller has uncovered), while the other (an incredibly well-known and well-regarded investigative journalist), is simply purporting to report actual conversations about Trump from those in his administration. How are those comparable?
Click to expand...
What was the Mueller investigation based on? Collusion right? It's not there and never was. We can see without a doubt that Trump was framed. Just read the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text. That should be all you need.
 
#17,874
#17,874
BigOrangeD said:
The text are out. You are blind.
Click to expand...

Sheesh. "Media leak strategy" referred to the doj's efforts to CURB media leaks. Horwitz, your former hero (until he left you with a bad case of blue balls), had these texts. Not an issue for him because he knew what was being discussed was not a strategy on how to leak but a strategy for preventing those leaks.
 
#17,875
#17,875
evillawyer said:
Sheesh. "Media leak strategy" referred to the doj's efforts to CURB media leaks. Horwitz, your former hero (until he left you with a bad case of blue balls), had these texts. Not an issue for him because he knew what was being discussed was not a strategy on how to leak but a strategy for preventing those leaks.
Click to expand...
You believe that. If the shoe was on the other foot, I bet you would sing a different tune. You are being duped.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top