ajvol01
GBO!
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 25,426
- Likes
- 30,006
We've reached the two minute warning of the Trump catastrophe.
And yes, I said the game would be over by this past July 21st, but I was under the false impression that there was a mercy rule that would be enforced. I never dreamed we would be forced to sit through the entire stinking game.
It would change it to a once in every 500 years anomaly. Like lightening striking the same person twice in one day.
That is just wrong. Assange has claimed that the DNC hacks weren't done by Russia and even tried to advance the Seth Rich nonsense. The WikiLeaks agenda is hostile to the United States and our intelligence agencies...the media has not proven to be factual about any of this speculation. Assange has proven to be pretty on target when he says stuff.
Or, it could also mean that we live in a country that has enough people willing to nominate, vote for and elect the person you just described. Amirite?Lol what it would mean, just going off of liberal logic , is that the the Dems could not find a person in their party that could beat the worse racist , sexist , idiotic , mentally unstable , Egotistical , Hitler , Putin puppet .. twice in a row to become president . That would indeed make one question the validity of one’s party . Amirite?
Or, it could also mean that we live in a country that has enough people willing to nominate, vote for and elect the person you just described. Amirite?
Of course it shouldn't. It shouldn't have been a problem beating Trump in 2016. That's the anomaly part. Only once every 200 years, or 500 years in the disastrous case of reelection, is there a convergence of factors capable of moving enough seemingly descent people to vote for a historically horrendous and despicable candidate in order to win a presidential election.Twice for president ? Hmmm that indeed would be a cause for reflection if you were a liberal . I mean the votes for liberals are certainly there to elect a democrat or a socialist like Bernie . So it shouldnt be a problem voting Trump out in 2020 .
Of course it shouldn't. It shouldn't have been a problem beating Trump in 2016. That's the anomaly part. Only once every 200 years, or 500 years in the disastrous case of reelection, is there a convergence of factors capable of moving enough seemingly descent people to vote for a historically horrendous and despicable candidate in order to win a presidential election.
why because he leaked sensitive info? But if Comey and Brennan do it it's totally cool? Am I doing it right?That is just wrong. Assange has claimed that the DNC hacks weren't done by Russia and even tried to advance the Seth Rich nonsense. The WikiLeaks agenda is hostile to the United States and our intelligence agencies...
That is just wrong. Assange has claimed that the DNC hacks weren't done by Russia and even tried to advance the Seth Rich nonsense. The WikiLeaks agenda is hostile to the United States and our intelligence agencies...