TrumPutinGate

[theFallGuy]

and for the record we don't know what actually happened to Seth Rich, until we do it's open to speculation.

 

[Hunerwadel]

.. of course you are right , it has absolutely nothing to do with the liberal party not being able to find someone to beat this horrific president how silly of me to think that way .

Seems like we all agree that our choice was between two horrific pieces of ****.

 

[0nelilreb]

Seems like we all agree that our choice was between two horrific pieces of ****.

Well I actually said “ just going off of liberal logic” Those terms I used to describe him all come from left leaning media that wanted Hills to win.

 

[luthervol]

.. of course you are right , it has absolutely nothing to do with the liberal party not being able to find someone to beat this horrific president how silly of me to think that way .

Your party nominated him from a pool of 17.

 

[0nelilreb]

Your party nominated him from a pool of 17.

And your party couldn’t produce anything but a warm body to stop it . The problem is you still can’t find one to stop the reelection . You have an identity crises going on inside the DNC and they will eat each other alive just trying to get the chance to run against him .

 

[Weezer]

Of course it shouldn't. It shouldn't have been a problem beating Trump in 2016. That's the anomaly part. Only once every 200 years, or 500 years in the disastrous case of reelection, is there a convergence of factors capable of moving enough seemingly descent people to vote for a historically horrendous and despicable candidate in order to win a presidential election.

The problem was the final choice came down to TWO horrendous and despicable candidates so America chose what they considered the lesser of two evils. We've had this discussion before and you still cannot acknowledge your party also ran a horrible candidate. America did not have a "good" choice in 2016. Your constant belly-aching has grown tiresome. Decent people chose Trump because they believed Hillary to be worse. It baffles me that the left still cannot see this. Your candidate was at least just as bad as Trump, and in the eyes of many, she was worse. Run a better candidate and the left can win in 2020.

 

[Weezer]

Your party nominated him from a pool of 17.

And your party rigged its own primary for its "historically horrendous and despicable candidate". Both sides made poor choices. You continue to see this as one-sided. It's not. Instead of blaming the right, you should be screaming for change in the party you support.

 

[0nelilreb]

And your party rigged its own primary for its "historically horrendous and despicable candidate". Both sides made poor choices. You continue to see this as one-sided. It's not. Instead of blaming the right, you should be screaming for change in the party you support.

I’ll take .. words you’ll never come out of Luther’s mouth for a thousand Alec

 

[luthervol]

The problem was the final choice came down to TWO horrendous and despicable candidates so America chose what they considered the lesser of two evils. We've had this discussion before and you still cannot acknowledge your party also ran a horrible candidate. America did not have a "good" choice in 2016. Your constant belly-aching has grown tiresome. Decent people chose Trump because they believed Hillary to be worse. It baffles me that the left still cannot see this. Your candidate was at least just as bad as Trump, and in the eyes of many, she was worse. Run a better candidate and the left can win in 2020.

But we're now talking about one of those horrendous and despicable candidates being supported for a second term. Where is the outcry from the right to put up someone better than Trump?

Are you going to support a despicable and horrendous candidate for the republican nomination in 2020? If not, how are you going to show your lack of support?

Also, I would hope the belly-aching is tiresome; that's certainly the intent. Trump should never be accepted as a proper choice for the POTUS. The people on here who would love to see him serve a second term are not only tiresome, but quite possibly insane.

 

[0nelilreb]

But we're now talking about one of those horrendous and despicable candidates being supported for a second term. Where is the outcry from the right to put up someone better than Trump?

Are you going to support a despicable and horrendous candidate for the republican nomination in 2020? If not, how are you going to show your lack of support?

Also, I would hope the belly-aching is tiresome; that's certainly the intent. Trump should never be accepted as a proper choice for the POTUS. The people on here who would love to see him serve a second term are not only tiresome, but quite possibly insane.

Is your party going to put up someone we can all come together and vote on ? If so who is it ?

 

[luthervol]

And your party rigged its own primary for its "historically horrendous and despicable candidate". Both sides made poor choices. You continue to see this as one-sided. It's not. Instead of blaming the right, you should be screaming for change in the party you support.

I guess it would boil down to how you compare the people on the left who felt Hillary was a good candidate to the people on the right who felt Trump was a good candidate.
Therein, can be found the difference.

 

[luthervol]

Is your party going to put up someone we can all come together and vote on ? If so who is it ?

Of course not. That human doesn't exist.

 

[Hunerwadel]

And your party rigged its own primary for its "historically horrendous and despicable candidate". Both sides made poor choices. You continue to see this as one-sided. It's not. Instead of blaming the right, you should be screaming for change in the party you support.

We're making strides. At least we've barred superdelegates from voting their choice on the first ballot.

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[Weezer]

But we're now talking about one of those horrendous and despicable candidates being supported for a second term. Where is the outcry from the right to put up someone better than Trump?

Are you going to support a despicable and horrendous candidate for the republican nomination in 2020? If not, how are you going to show your lack of support?

Also, I would hope the belly-aching is tiresome; that's certainly the intent. Trump should never be accepted as a proper choice for the POTUS. The people on here who would love to see him serve a second term are not only tiresome, but quite possibly insane.

I didn't support Trump in 2016. I disliked both candidates so I didn't vote in the 2016 Presidential election. Even now, I don't like Trump, but I do support the office that he holds. I've continuously told you, if the left wants to win in 2020, run a better candidate. Being apolitical, I don't bother with the primaries. I'll let the parties choose their candidates then I'll decide if I like one of them.

I actually agree that Trump should never have been accepted as a proper choice for POTUS. The problem, and I state this once again, is that Hillary should never have been accepted as a proper choice either. That's the part you refuse to acknowledge. She was a horrible choice as well. The fact you cannot see that makes me think you might be the insane one.

 

[Weezer]

I guess it would boil down to how you compare the people on the left who felt Hillary was a good candidate to the people on the right who felt Trump was a good candidate.
Therein, can be found the difference.

People on the left wanted more of the same insanity. People on the right wanted something new. Both sides were misguided in their choices.

 

[happy-go_vol]

What did you call Loretta Lynch meeting on the tarmac with the husband of a presidential nominee under an FBI investigation? Coincidence?

The board's marxists ain't gonna answer this.

 

[ajvol01]

That is just wrong. Assange has claimed that the DNC hacks weren't done by Russia and even tried to advance the Seth Rich nonsense. The WikiLeaks agenda is hostile to the United States and our intelligence agencies...

What evidence do you have to refute anything Assange has said?

 

[Mick]

I didn't support Trump in 2016. I disliked both candidates so I didn't vote in the 2016 Presidential election. Even now, I don't like Trump, but I do support the office that he holds. I've continuously told you, if the left wants to win in 2020, run a better candidate. Being apolitical, I don't bother with the primaries. I'll let the parties choose their candidates then I'll decide if I like one of them.

I actually agree that Trump should never have been accepted as a proper choice for POTUS. The problem, and I state this once again, is that Hillary should never have been accepted as a proper choice either. That's the part you refuse to acknowledge. She was a horrible choice as well. The fact you cannot see that makes me think you might be the insane one.

You are a contradiction of intelligence. Oh I dislike both candidates but Hillary is "historically the worst". We get it, you are a Redhatter that didn't vote for Trump. Trump is by far the worst President I have ever seen. Hillary is not our president. If trying to belittle her and caller her names makes you fell better about Trump, you are the problem.

 

[1972 Grad]

You are a contradiction of intelligence. Oh I dislike both candidates but Hillary is "historically the worst". We get it, you are a Redhatter that didn't vote for Trump. Trump is by far the worst President I have ever seen. Hillary is not our president. If trying to belittle her and caller her names makes you fell better about Trump, you are the problem.

I voted for Trump, and will again if he runs. I see no reason not to at the present time.

 

[hog88]

I voted for Trump, and will again if he runs. I see no reason not to at the present time.

I didn't in 2016 but I see no reason as of now not to in 2020.

 

[Mick]

I voted for Trump, and will again if he runs. I see no reason not to at the present time.

You would have voted for a ham sandwich if it was an R.

 

[evillawyer]

I voted for Trump, and will again if he runs. I see no reason not to at the present time.

Have you been to an eye doctor lately? You may want to get your vision checked.

 

[C-south]

Have you been to an eye doctor lately? You may want to get your vision checked.

Don’t throw away your Pu$$y hat just yet.

 

[1972 Grad]

You would have voted for a ham sandwich if it was an R.

Nope. I can name several that I had the chance to vote for and didn't.