volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 35,597
- Likes
- 63,030
Again, that's the whole anomaly. He won over 18 challengers in his first election and he is a horrendous candidate and person. (Otherwise it wouldn't be such a shocking anomaly.)
When a critical mass forms the same opinion, the opinion approaches accepted fact.Won over 18 challengers - fact
First election - fact
Horrendous candidate - Opinion
Horrendous person - Opinion
The MSM has been dedicated to convince everyone of the 2 opinions above since Trump announced he would run.
If he's lying, he will be the first politician to do it.Trump also wrote the fake press release which said that the meeting was about adoption.
The odds he is lying are about 99 percent. Hopefully, Mueller can prove he's lying because I think that is what it will take to convince enough of his cult that he's got to go so we don't have loons shooting up the streets when it happens.
If he's lying, he will be the first politician to do it.
Is the critical mass you describe the source or the product of constant negative news?When a critical mass forms the same opinion, the opinion approaches accepted fact.
Think of a couple of historical horrible people. Are they horrible or is it just opinion?
The doctor thing affected my wife's insurance more that anything else on your list.You keep making that false equivalency. Saying you did not collude with our biggest adversary of the last 75 years to win election, said power with a history of manipulation and authoritarian control and expansionist ideals, when in fact you did and then publicly lied about it literally hundreds of times and then tried to cover it up is not the nearly same thing as being mistaken about being able to keep your doctor in all circumstances of insurance change.
No it's not. The main stream media portrays him appropriately. His leading of "lock her up" and "build that wall' cheers, his calling the main stream media enemies of the people, his saying he could grab women by their pu$$ies, his saying he could shoot someone in Times Square and people wold still love him, his denial of science, his playing on the fears and worst instincts of people, his constant lying, his silly and immature tweets, his juvenile name calling, his appointment of Bannon, etc., etc., etc.Is the critical mass you describe the source or the product of constant negative news?
Be honest with yourself.
MSM news coverage of Trump is >90% negative.
says the party of antifa and James T. HodgkinsonTrump also wrote the fake press release which said that the meeting was about adoption.
The odds he is lying are about 99 percent. Hopefully, Mueller can prove he's lying because I think that is what it will take to convince enough of his cult that he's got to go so we don't have loons shooting up the streets when it happens.
You keep making that false equivalency. Saying you did not collude with our biggest adversary of the last 75 years to win election, said power with a history of manipulation and authoritarian control and expansionist ideals, when in fact you did and then publicly lied about it literally hundreds of times and then tried to cover it up is not the nearly same thing as being mistaken about being able to keep your doctor in all circumstances of insurance change.