TrumPutinGate

To state the obvious, if Flynn has done nothing illegal, what is he worried about? The law is non-partisan.

He's worried about unhinged Dems who in their minds have already convicted Flynn of a crime without even a single shred of proof. And a highly politicized FBI who have been proven to be incompetent buffoons.

Why would he want to talk to them? What lawyer would ever advise someone to talk to people like that without getting assurances first?
 
He's worried about unhinged Dems who in their minds have already convicted Flynn of a crime without even a single shred of proof. And a highly politicized FBI who have been proven to be incompetent buffoons.

Why would he want to talk to them? What lawyer would ever advise someone to talk to people like that without getting assurances first?

I believe the only legal power that the Intelligence Committees have is to subpoena witnesses. If they want to force Flynn to testify, they can. Of course, if he's disagreeable, he would probably plead the 5th, but that is obviously damning for both him and Trump.

In Russia, it's about this time that guys like Flynn have the worst damn luck and fall down elevator shafts and what not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I hope everyone actually knows the facts here.
The only evidence anyone has is from a firm the DNC hired to look at their servers to see who hacked them. The FBI has not examined, not government agency has. We are all supposed to just take the DNC hired firms word for it.

And that is supposedly how the Russians "hacked" our election

Where are you getting this information?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Comey himself said they never got access to the servers

And when him and the NSA director were testifying a couple weeks ago both were asked if they had any proof 1 vote was changed in Wisconsin, Michigan or Pennsylvania due to Russian interference both said no
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Statement from Flynn's attorney

C8NHZtOU0AAC_C2

Can't say I blame him. I would ask for basically the same terms Hillary's people got. Come in say nothing then have the FBI destroy the evidence and get off scot free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I hope everyone actually knows the facts here.
The only evidence anyone has is from a firm the DNC hired to look at their servers to see who hacked them. The FBI has not examined, not government agency has. We are all supposed to just take the DNC hired firms word for it.

And that is supposedly how the Russians "hacked" our election

Crowdstrike has a government contract and its proactive and incident response services is led by Shawn Henry, who is a former FBI assistant director, who lead both the FBI’s criminal and cyber Divisions, Henry established the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force and he has contacts throughout Western and Eastern Europe. So let's not act like Crowdstrike isn't legit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Crowdstrike has a government contract and its proactive and incident response services is led by Shawn Henry, who is a former FBI assistant director, who lead both the FBI’s criminal and cyber Divisions, Henry established the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force and he has contacts throughout Western and Eastern Europe. So let's not act like Crowdstrike isn't legit.

They still were working for a paying client so they're susceptible to giving results the client wants. Why not allow the FBI to look at the servers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Crowdstrike has a government contract and its proactive and incident response services is led by Shawn Henry, who is a former FBI assistant director, who lead both the FBI’s criminal and cyber Divisions, Henry established the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force and he has contacts throughout Western and Eastern Europe. So let's not act like Crowdstrike isn't legit.

The FBI should be able to look at the servers, right or wrong? Some want the President impeached over something a private company hired by the DNC says. No proof has been presented.
 
Do you know who else would be an idiot to not seek immunity? Someone who has committed a crime and is about testify about someone else who has committed a crime.

Like I've always been told never talk to the cops without a lawyer, I've never committed an crime. :whistling:
 
Crowdstrike has a government contract and its proactive and incident response services is led by Shawn Henry, who is a former FBI assistant director, who lead both the FBI’s criminal and cyber Divisions, Henry established the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force and he has contacts throughout Western and Eastern Europe. So let's not act like Crowdstrike isn't legit.

They're legitimately unreliable
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Based on his attorney's statement, he never actually asked for immunity. Also, a spokesman for the house intel community said he didn't either. FAKE NEWS?

However he might as well, if you ask me.
 
Karma is most definitely a cruel *****.

I know. Kind of like that person who has the entire primary election rigged in their favor, almost the entire media in her back pocket, scandal after scandal after scandal ignored or marginalized and still manages to lose the White House.

Sometimes karma is quite pleasant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I know. Kind of like that person who has the entire primary election rigged in their favor, almost the entire media in her back pocket, scandal after scandal after scandal ignored or marginalized and still manages to lose the White House.

Sometimes karma is quite pleasant.

Depends on which side you're on. But yes she can be hilarious at times.
 

VN Store



Back
Top