Orange_Vol1321
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2012
- Messages
- 28,132
- Likes
- 42,020
Wow...
Destroying evidence against Clinton doesn't undermine the weight of evidence emerging?
Withholding (302) evidence that would have been beneficial to Flynn doesn't undermine the weight of the evidence emerging?
Begging the court not to force him to actually try a case he indicted because he didn't want to submit evidence he supposedly had?
Ironic response seeing that Mueller's various "mistakes" have been more about covering things up than exposing them.
Are you claiming that a 302 report wasnt withheld per Flynn's FBI agent interview, though it was referenced in the written 7 months later? That Hillary's emails weren't wiped? That strzok's texts weren't lost? That Mueller didn't ask a judge to not make him try a case against a Russian company he had indicted? That Comey didn't refuse to answer questions after pursuing about public questions in the name of transparency?This would be pretty serious . . . if it were true.
Are you claiming that a 302 report wasnt withheld per Flynn's FBI agent interview, though it was referenced in the written 7 months later? That Hillary's emails weren't wiped? That strzok's texts weren't lost? That Mueller didn't ask a judge to not make him try a case against a Russian company he had indicted? That Comey didn't refuse to answer questions after pursuing about public questions in the name of transparency?
...and Giuliani was playing it up hard on the Sunday morning shows, two days ago. I would bet the Judge got wind of that and it really pi$$ed him off. Either admit you knowingly lied to the FBI agents and knew it was a crime when you did it, or withdraw the guilty plea... seems pretty simple.It got a lot of traction here.
That's who's conduct we had been discussing.
Sure, there's been mistakes during the course of the investigation, but that doesn't undermine the weight of evidence emerging.
As if this was Flynn's only problem.