Mick
Mr. Orange
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2013
- Messages
- 21,564
- Likes
- 9,765
So the buzzfeed reporter said in the sound clip that he had two sources “on the record”. If that’s true then can you tell us who they are and show us their corroborating statement.He just don't want to disappoint Justin so he keeps fighting.
So the buzzfeed reporter said in the sound clip that he had two sources “on the record”. If that’s true then can you tell us who they are and show us their corroborating statement.
Or do we need to wait for the big reveal at a beltway Holiday Inn in three weeks?
Somewhere in here, I explained my feels that Clinton not being removed is how we got into this mess.
(Ironically Charlie Sykes had a podcast a few days ago talking about the direct line between Newt Gingrich in the late 80s to Clinton in the late 90s to our present political climate. Not sure Sykes is a tremendous authority on much, but I always feel mildly affirmed knowing that other people have independently reached the same conclusion that I did.)
Maybe it’s time to correct that mistake.
Longer version of same interview
In three weeks the stage is congress.So the buzzfeed reporter said in the sound clip that he had two sources “on the record”. If that’s true then can you tell us who they are and show us their corroborating statement.
Or do we need to wait for the big reveal at a beltway Holiday Inn in three weeks?
I see absolutely nothing in evidence supporting your claim.
Stories this week that confirmed the agencies actually did start an investigation into the US President, based literally merely on the fact that his foreign policy differed from their preferences (and known dirty intel against him), after having denied they had done so.Do tell
I’m not concerned one way or the other. Until somebody with direct knowledge makes a public statement on the record corroborating the claims this is just another useless hearsay piece... in a very long line of hearsay pieces.
Here’s gonna be the mantra. Buzzfeed makes statements from unnamed sources. Cohen says stuff in front of congress. You idiots will claim they corroborate each other and call it validated![]()
Nobody will take Cohen at his word with no corroborating information as actionable evidence and you know it. And you’re already laying the ground work for the buzzfeed/Cohen cross validation mantra you moonbats are going to claim.Cohen testifying to it would be evidence. Testimony is evidence.
You want documentation of it, fine, I get that. Maybe there is, maybe there isn't. But if Cohen testifies to it, that has to be considered,, warts and all.
I find the lack of straight up denial and all these cryptic comments from the administration to suggest that its true.