TrumPutinGate

He just don't want to disappoint Justin so he keeps fighting.
So the buzzfeed reporter said in the sound clip that he had two sources “on the record”. If that’s true then can you tell us who they are and show us their corroborating statement.

Or do we need to wait for the big reveal at a beltway Holiday Inn in three weeks?
 
So the buzzfeed reporter said in the sound clip that he had two sources “on the record”. If that’s true then can you tell us who they are and show us their corroborating statement.

Or do we need to wait for the big reveal at a beltway Holiday Inn in three weeks?

Haha. Equating Wohl with Pulitzer prize winner. Go on with your bad self.
 
Somewhere in here, I explained my feels that Clinton not being removed is how we got into this mess.

(Ironically Charlie Sykes had a podcast a few days ago talking about the direct line between Newt Gingrich in the late 80s to Clinton in the late 90s to our present political climate. Not sure Sykes is a tremendous authority on much, but I always feel mildly affirmed knowing that other people have independently reached the same conclusion that I did.)

Maybe it’s time to correct that mistake.

Newt Gingrich has been a cancer for years
 
Longer version of same interview

What are the odds he asked Trump that question and if he did Trump answered him? He provided the answer that he was given to provide. He didn’t wing it and provide an answer he didn’t have. And he deferred to WH counsel’s statements. I’d say he gave the correct answer yet you idiot moonbats are trying to restate his actual answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
So the buzzfeed reporter said in the sound clip that he had two sources “on the record”. If that’s true then can you tell us who they are and show us their corroborating statement.

Or do we need to wait for the big reveal at a beltway Holiday Inn in three weeks?
In three weeks the stage is congress.
 
Here’s gonna be the mantra. Buzzfeed makes statements from unnamed sources. Cohen says stuff in front of congress. You idiots will claim they corroborate each other and call it validated 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
Lol... you’ve got a bigly Yuge credibility problem then! And I absolutely knew this was gonna be your comeback! “Wait till Cohen tells Congress!”... can’t wait 😈
I am really going to miss Gowdy being there for this. We know the dems will be leading him and completely sucking up to get the boogey man
 
I see absolutely nothing in evidence supporting your claim.


Cohen testifying to it would be evidence. Testimony is evidence.

You want documentation of it, fine, I get that. Maybe there is, maybe there isn't. But if Cohen testifies to it, that has to be considered,, warts and all.

I find the lack of straight up denial and all these cryptic comments from the administration to suggest that its true.
 
Stories this week that confirmed the agencies actually did start an investigation into the US President, based literally merely on the fact that his foreign policy differed from their preferences (and known dirty intel against him), after having denied they had done so.

That's been about to hit the fan, so they leaked it for spin, spun it, and now we have these stories as distraction based on anonymous sources.
 
I’m not concerned one way or the other. Until somebody with direct knowledge makes a public statement on the record corroborating the claims this is just another useless hearsay piece... in a very long line of hearsay pieces.

That are often timed to distract from other bits in the news cycle, only to be quietly corrected later.
 
Here’s gonna be the mantra. Buzzfeed makes statements from unnamed sources. Cohen says stuff in front of congress. You idiots will claim they corroborate each other and call it validated 😂

That's literally the way the FISA approvals worked. The 3 letter agencies leaked fake dossier to media. They then gave the fake dossier as evidence. They then used media stories as corroboration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
Cohen testifying to it would be evidence. Testimony is evidence.

You want documentation of it, fine, I get that. Maybe there is, maybe there isn't. But if Cohen testifies to it, that has to be considered,, warts and all.

I find the lack of straight up denial and all these cryptic comments from the administration to suggest that its true.
Nobody will take Cohen at his word with no corroborating information as actionable evidence and you know it. And you’re already laying the ground work for the buzzfeed/Cohen cross validation mantra you moonbats are going to claim.
 

VN Store



Back
Top