Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#2,726
#2,726
Franklin Pierce said:
68454301-11833827-Tucker_Carlson_is_seen_in_July_2022_with_Marjorie_Taylor_Greene_-a-1_1678257691003.jpg

Tucker Carlson is seen in July 2022 with Marjorie Taylor Greene and Trump at his New Jersey golf course. Carlson in January 2021 said he hated Trump 'passionately'
Click to expand...

Do you have the sads having found out your hero is a fraud? I should clarify I am talking about Tucker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#2,727
#2,727
TN Ribs said:
Yes, the violent insurrection that injured 140 cops still happened despite the fact that the moronic Q Shaman milled around the Capitol Building. And it was all based on The Big Lie which makes everyone who participated dumber than a box of rocks.
Click to expand...
The Big Lie was all the Covid fear mongering. I’d love to know exactly who was really causing problems at the Capitol that day. I’d be willing to bet they were Antifa or BLM or maybe FBI influenced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,728
#2,728
luthervol said:
And my math is that the Capital was entered at 1:00 and cleared by 8:00. (7 hours)
I think several teams of viewers could watch multiple camera angles at the same time, and pretty quickly pull the relevant video.
Click to expand...
So someone is still SELECTING for you though, right. The ONLY way for you to be certs that you are seeing the complete picture without having to trust someone else’s editorial choices (even if you handpicked the „teams of viewers“) would be for you to dedicate 4.68 years of your life to the effort.
Not trying to belittle you. Just pointing out that we all have to trust someone to chose what clips of the event we see. I myself see no reason to trust Tucker any LESS than I would trust the paid ABC production team hired by a congressional committee whose members made no secret of their absolute loathing of Trump. Bottom line is you have to chose an editor and anyone you chose will bring their own personal biases to the task.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,729
#2,729
volfanhill said:
Do you have the sads having found out your hero is a fraud? I should clarify I am talking about Tucker.
Click to expand...
Show me ANYONE in politics or the media who is NOT a fraud and then I will have the possibility of the sads. Until then, I will continue my jaded cynicism uninterrupted.
 
#2,731
#2,731
luthervol said:
That seems like yet another argument in support of releasing the footage to multiple sources.
Click to expand...
Every network not named Fox had over two years to request it of Pelosi. As far as we know, the amount of interest in such an endeavor was ZERO. Only when Tucker got it was there any clamour for anyone to want to see it all. Why is that? 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, CobbVol, StarRaider and 1 other person
#2,732
#2,732
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#2,733
#2,733
OrangeTsar said:
Every network not named Fox had over two years to request it of Pelosi. As far as we know, the amount of interest in such an endeavor was ZERO. Only when Tucker got it was there any clamour for anyone to want to see it all. Why is that? 🤔
Click to expand...

Same theme with Twitter.
 
#2,735
#2,735
OrangeTsar said:
So someone is still SELECTING for you though, right. The ONLY way for you to be certs that you are seeing the complete picture without having to trust someone else’s editorial choices (even if you handpicked the „teams of viewers“) would be for you to dedicate 4.68 years of your life to the effort.
Not trying to belittle you. Just pointing out that we all have to trust someone to chose what clips of the event we see. I myself see no reason to trust Tucker any LESS than I would trust the paid ABC production team hired by a congressional committee whose members made no secret of their absolute loathing of Trump. Bottom line is you have to chose an editor and anyone you chose will bring their own personal biases to the task.
Click to expand...
Which is why having multiple sources would be best.
But Fox is the worst choice - close to zero credibility, and getting closer every day.

And Tucker loathes Trump. He just kept it a secret from his followers, just an inside joke between him and the other Fox shysters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#2,736
#2,736
luthervol said:
Which is why having multiple sources would be best.
But Fox is the worst choice - close to zero credibility, and getting closer every day.

And Tucker loathes Trump. He just kept it a secret from his followers, just an inside joke between him and the other Fox shysters.
Click to expand...
Multiple sources would indeed be best. Which begs the question; why did CNN, MSNBC, ABC, PBS, NPR, CBS, NBC, the Washington Post, The NY Times, the Associated Press and everyone else set on their hands for 2 years and not pick up the phone and call Nancy Pelosi and ask for a copy? Inquiring minds want to know. (Although we all know the answer though don’t we)
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol and StarRaider
#2,737
#2,737
luthervol said:
Which is why having multiple sources would be best.
But Fox is the worst choice - close to zero credibility, and getting closer every day.

And Tucker loathes Trump. He just kept it a secret from his followers, just an inside joke between him and the other Fox shysters.
Click to expand...
I loathe Trump, probably more than Tucker does. But I would crawl through broken glass covered in salt and vinegar to reach the voting booth and pull the lever for Donald if he is up against Biden come November 2024
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
#2,738
#2,738
OrangeTsar said:
Multiple sources would indeed be best. Which begs the question; why did CNN, MSNBC, ABC, PBS, NPR, CBS, NBC, the Washington Post, The NY Times, the Associated Press and everyone else set on their hands for 2 years and not pick up the phone and call Nancy Pelosi and ask for a copy? Inquiring minds want to know. (Although we all know the answer though don’t we)
Click to expand...
Why did Fox sit on their hands?
 
#2,739
#2,739
OrangeTsar said:
I loathe Trump, probably more than Tucker does. But I would crawl through broken glass covered in salt and vinegar to reach the voting booth and pull the lever for Donald if he is up against Biden come November 2024
Click to expand...
That's why you should do everything within your power to ensure he is not the nominee. Same as was true in 2016 and 2020.

I do not loathe Biden, but I didn't support him in the primaries in 2020 nor will I in 2024 - if he runs, which I hope he doesn't.

But I would crawl naked over broken glass chugging salt and vinegar to reach the voting booth and pull the lever for Joe if he is up against Trump. Here's to hoping neither run.
 
Last edited:
#2,742
#2,742
Washington — Senate Republicans on Tuesday refuted Fox News host Tucker Carlson's portrayal of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, saying his characterization of the events as "mostly peaceful" is at odds with the reality they experienced as a mob of former President Donald Trump's supporters breached the building.
CBS News is part of a group of media organizations demanding access to the tranche of videos from the attack.
 
#2,743
#2,743
CobbVol said:
Do you think the Jan 6th committee was biased?
Click to expand...
Of course they were biased. Everyone is.
But they were nowhere near as biased as the current rightwing leadership.
Just as CNN, ABC, etc....are nowhere near as biased as Fox.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top