Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

You sound like a cornball trying to talk someone out of why they don't want to have sex with one of the cutest girls at the school. Her teets are too big. She get C's in class. She is too tall and don't like short guys.
You sound like an idiot who thinks Tucker Carlson's opinions are genuine. LOL.
 
. Yet, you think this was a "violent insurrection" (parroted immediately by all your favorite MSM) despite the fact that Capitol police were walking the leader around and opening doors for him.
You know who else is calling it an "insurrection" ? Republican Senator Mike Rounds from South Dakota. He is not a member of the liberal media either; nor is he a RINO. He was present that day, and more qualified to speak on the events of that day than you are.
 
Fox News attack dog Tucker Carlson turns on Trump: 'I don't think he's capable'

Sorry, but that was very easy. It took me 11 seconds. This is from 2018 and it wasn't in a private text message.
That's one ... and it's interesting that you had to post something from a liberal site, like The Guardian. LOL .... Tucker Carlson kisses Donald Trump's butt. Not because he likes him .... but because it's what The Cult of Trump wants to hear, and Carlson only cares about ratings.
 
Last edited:
I'm betting not a single person who watched Fox before these texts came out has changed his/her viewing habits. Fox has always been about telling its audience what it wants to hear, not what the truth is. That's exactly what the right wing wants. There's no doubt the Fox personalities didn't believe Trump's claims of election fraud. It's in their own words. But they knew they had to tell you what you wanted to hear. And their ratings showed it.
 
You mean the way Jan 6th was presented to us for the past 3 years? From one source only.
By "one source", I assume you are talking about the January 6th Committee? Republican Senator Lindsey Graham is not only dismissing Tucker Carlson's attempt to downplay the events of January 6th, he actually said yesterday that the January 6th Committee should have gone even further and discussed the bombs that were planted the night before.

The condemnation of Carlson for his lies ... has been bi-partisan. That can not be denied.

 
Last edited:
By "one source", I assume you are talking about the January 6th Committee? Republican Senator Sen. Lindsey Graham is not only dismissing Tucker Carlson's attempt to downplay the events of January 6th, he actually said yesterday that the January 6th Committee should have gone even further and discussed the bombs that were planted the night before.

The condemnation of Carlson for his lies ... has been bi-partisan. That can not be denied.



What exactly cannot be denied? I’ve seen plenty of lies from the left about January 6th such as officer deaths. I know you’d never consider I post BLM suicide to be caused by blm riots.

So what lie are you accusing him of and what evidence do you have?
 
You mean the way Jan 6th was presented to us for the past 3 years? From one source only.

That was the Repubs fault. After they were told they couldn't put their nutcase reps (who are proving the wisdom of that after giving Jordan a committee where he keeps getting exposed by his own witnesses) on the panels, they withdrew from participation, except for Cheney and Kinzinger. They regret that now.

Oh wait, there were 2 Repubs on the Jan. 6 committee, imagine that. Guess it wasn't all one source.
 
What exactly cannot be denied? I’ve seen plenty of lies from the left about January 6th such as officer deaths. I know you’d never consider I post BLM suicide to be caused by blm riots.

So what lie are you accusing him of and what evidence do you have?
Tucker Carlson said that it was a mostly peaceful protest. There are now 6 Republican Senators on the public record who have called that statement a lie, and denounced him for his attempts to downplay the riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Those Republican Senators were there ... Tucker Carlson was not.

Watch that video of *Republican* Sen. Lindsey Graham in that post you replied to .... LOL.
 
That was the Repubs fault. After they were told they couldn't put their nutcase reps (who are proving the wisdom of that after giving Jordan a committee where he keeps getting exposed by his own witnesses) on the panels, they withdrew from participation, except for Cheney and Kinzinger. They regret that now.

Oh wait, there were 2 Repubs on the Jan. 6 committee, imagine that. Guess it wasn't all one source.

It was one source for sure. Selected leaks from the committee.

If this was truly a 9/11 or Pearl Harbor level event, then shouldn’t the people have a right to access the video of that event?

For 3 years that was denied
 
Tucker Carlson said that it was a mostly peaceful protest. There are now 6 Republican Senators on the public record who have called that statement a lie, and denounced him for his attempts to downplay the riot at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Those Republican Senators were there ... Tucker Carlson was not.

Watch that video of *Republican* Sen. Lindsey Graham in that post you replied to .... LOL.

Lindsey Graham is and has been a joke his entire career. He’s on video attempting to talk Ukrainians into invading Russia over a decade ago.

I imagine Tucker was simply defining January 6th the same way we do other political riots in this country. If over 51% of people are not harming others, “mostly peaceful”.

Is that your biggest complaint? A semantic difference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
Lindsey Graham is and has been a joke his entire career. He’s on video attempting to talk Ukrainians into invading Russia over a decade ago.

I imagine Tucker was simply defining January 6th the same way we do other political riots in this country. If over 51% of people are not harming others, “mostly peaceful”.

Is that your biggest complaint? A semantic difference?
LOL. Of course .... because he isn't playing along with your desired narrative.
 
I'm betting not a single person who watched Fox before these texts came out has changed his/her viewing habits. Fox has always been about telling its audience what it wants to hear, not what the truth is. That's exactly what the right wing wants. There's no doubt the Fox personalities didn't believe Trump's claims of election fraud. It's in their own words. But they knew they had to tell you what you wanted to hear. And their ratings showed it.

I’m not a FN viewer but how are they any different than the other cable newstainment networks?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
So once again if this is a Pearl Harbor, 11-22-63, or 9/11 level event….

Why did the public go 3 years without this video? If it’s this significant of an event, then access to the video should be extremely important
 
How was it one source? Fox had the same access as every other news source.

That level of access was highly controlled by the senate. Was it not?

So one source was selectively releasing this to show it in the worst light possible. You had no problem with that. But now one source is doing the opposite and that’s bad?
 
I'm betting not a single person who watched Fox before these texts came out has changed his/her viewing habits. Fox has always been about telling its audience what it wants to hear, not what the truth is. That's exactly what the right wing wants. There's no doubt the Fox personalities didn't believe Trump's claims of election fraud. It's in their own words. But they knew they had to tell you what you wanted to hear. And their ratings showed it.
So is it better for a network to tell viewers what they want to hear or is it better to tell viewers what the government wants them to hear?
 

VN Store



Back
Top