Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

[OrangeTsar]

It would depend on why he did not watch the footage.

Is there a single GOOD reason you could possibly think of? If the fate of the nation was at stake, what did he have better to spend his time on? Mario Brothers?

 

[KB5252]

Better to release it to no one than to one extremely biased source.

Name the unbiased sources for us.

 

[luthervol]

You don't think that having a trial that those on the committee should have watched the footage? Would you accept a jury making a decision without evidence?

I'm sure the footage was watched. I would accept a jury making a decision based on the evidence presented.

 

[luthervol]

Is there a single GOOD reason you could possibly think of? If the fate of the nation was at stake, what did he have better to spend his time on? Mario Brothers?

Someone was commenting yesterday on the fact that there were thousands of hours of footage. I wouldn't expect anyone to view all of the footage. I would expect that all parts of the footage were viewed by one person or another.

 

[luthervol]

Name the unbiased sources for us.

There has never been one. But all sources are not equally biased - not even close.
And that is why it should be released to all media sources, or none.

 

[BreatheUT]

Jan 6th Select Committee = Kangaroo Court.

These folks are wilfully ignorant. This is Thompson's way out of it? Clowns.

 

[KB5252]

It would depend on why he did not watch the footage.

A committee convened to understand exactly what happened, who may have been responsible or complicit and how/why it happened at all never watched the only undisputable evidence available?

I'm not a conspiracy theorist on this subject but I'd need to hear a compelling reason why they didn't for me to take their findings as much more than partisan politics.

 

[BreatheUT]

It would depend on why he did not watch the footage.

Seriously man?

 

[luthervol]

Hey Luth, do you do maths? WHATEVER you watch on Jan 6 will be SELECTED. There are 41,000 HOURS of video. If you wish to sit down and watch nonstop the unselected video record yourself , starting tonight, you should finish up sometime in late 2027. are you volunteering?

Is there a single GOOD reason you could possibly think of? If the fate of the nation was at stake, what did he have better to spend his time on? Mario Brothers?

?????????

 

[scooty_vol]

Seriously man?

View attachment 540068

Sadly,, Luther is

 

[KB5252]

There has never been one. But all sources are not equally biased - not even close.
And that is why it should be released to all media sources, or none.

I don't mind the opposition being given the story to run with. Been happening that way for a long time. The only difference now is battle lines have been drawn. There are no longer real voices of journalism at the entities. Dissenting viewpoints and voices are no longer tolerated at any news network or corp anymore. You give it to those who'll listen.

I guess the people need to ask questions for themselves. I'm not a Tucker guy but what little I've seen certainly deserves some follow-up. All over seen from others is coverage as to why it shouldn't be trusted. Journalism is dead.

 

[OrangeTsar]

?????????

Thompson apparently didn’t watch ANY of the video. Please read more carefully

 

[luthervol]

Seriously man?

View attachment 540068

Of course I'm serious. He could have a multitude of good reasons for never having seen the footage.

Sometimes I an forced to conclude that many of you have lost the ability of independent thought.
Maybe Tucker will address it tonight for you.

 

[luthervol]

I don't mind the opposition being given the story to run with. Been happening that way for a long time. The only difference now is battle lines have been drawn. There are no longer real voices of journalism at the entities. Dissenting viewpoints and voices are no longer tolerated at any news network or corp anymore. You give it to those who'll listen.

I guess the people need to ask questions for themselves. I'm not a Tucker guy but what little I've seen certainly deserves some follow-up. All over seen from others is coverage as to why it shouldn't be trusted. Journalism is dead.

Happening for a long time?
When has the government ever selected an individual media source to exclusive provide investigative evidence to disseminate as they see fit?

Just ONE example.

 

[whodeycin85]

I'm sure the footage was watched. I would accept a jury making a decision based on the evidence presented.

So your ok with a trial where only evidence (doctored at that) show only 1 side as opposed to a fair and just system?

 

[luthervol]

Thompson apparently didn’t watch ANY of the video. Please read more carefully

Because he couldn't watch it all.
Are you saying watching selected pieces is sufficient?

Please think more carefully.

 

[tnmarktx]

 

[luthervol]

So your ok with a trial where only evidence (doctored at that) show only 1 side as opposed to a fair and just system?

What kind of question is that?
Of course I want as close to a fair and just system as possible.

That's why the precedent being set of releasing information exclusively to an extremely biased media source is horrible.

 

[tnmarktx]

What kind of question is that?
Of course I want as close to a fair and just system as possible.

That's why the precedent being set of releasing information exclusively to an extremely biased media source is horrible.

100% of the media is biased. You seem to be mad because you favor one bias over another.

 

[whodeycin85]

What kind of question is that?
Of course I want as close to a fair and just system as possible.

That's why the precedent being set of releasing information exclusively to an extremely biased media source is horrible.

But having a committee that is completely bias and never watched the footage is acceptable? Do you really not see the hypocrisy?

 

[BreatheUT]

Of course I'm serious. He could have a multitude of good reasons for never having seen the footage.

Sometimes I an forced to conclude that many of you have lost the ability of independent thought.
Maybe Tucker will address it tonight for you.

Well he's incompetent. The mofo is a chairperson of a committee. I'm not surprised by it though and I'm not surprised you have weaseled your way into defending it.

 

[Jxn Vol]

What kind of question is that?
Of course I want as close to a fair and just system as possible.

That's why the precedent being set of releasing information exclusively to an extremely biased media source is horrible.

I prefer edited video released by a biased congressional committee.

It’s fun watching folks try to pick up a turd from the clean end.

 

[luthervol]

100% of the media is biased. You seem to be mad because you favor one bias over another.

Everyone is biased. Always has been and always will be.
However, everyone is not equally biased......and that is all we can focus on.
Some make every attempt to be as unbiased as possible while some embrace their bias and play it for all its worth.
And most are somewhere in between.
I have absolute certainty on where Fox lies on that continuum.

 

[luthervol]

But having a committee that is completely bias and never watched the footage is acceptable? Do you really not see the hypocrisy?

Were there republicans on that committee?

 

[luthervol]

Well he's incompetent. The mofo is a chairperson of a committee. I'm not surprised but it though and I'm not surprised you have weaseled your way into defending it.

I'm not defending anything; I'm simply acknowledging the fact that he could have a valid reason for having seen none of the footage.