Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#3,001
#3,001
Jxn Vol said:
No I watched all 44,000 hours on mute.

And it really doesn’t matter what I saw and my opinion on it.

What matters is the defendants didn’t get all the video turned over to them.
Click to expand...
Why didn't they ask for it?
 
#3,002
#3,002
The conservatives, such as Mollie Hemingway, who are sending those tweets alleging that the January 6th Committee did not review ANY surveillance footage are flat out lying. They think they can get away with it because they know that their followers didn't watch the hearings.
 
#3,004
#3,004
BowlBrother85 said:
The conservatives, such as Mollie Hemingway, who are sending those tweets alleging that the January 6th Committee did not review ANY surveillance footage are flat out lying. They think they can get away with it because they know that their followers didn't watch the hearings.
Click to expand...

Lmao. Keep trying to convince us you know it all & we should believe only in what you bring to the table as being truth. Mollie is a very credible person. And calling her a liar shows your ignorance & bias/hate for republicans. You just don't like what she says because she isn't a die hard radical democrat & is not a supporter of the democrat's failing policies..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#3,005
#3,005
TN Ribs said:
No, not in context. He encouraged them and then ran away. The lesson is simple, if you don't want to be shown running away when things turn violent, don't encourage them in the first place. It's his own damn fault.
Click to expand...
Context was he was in the back of a group running away....framed as he ran away by himself as a coward....the footage shown by J6 didn't show the dozen or so people ahead of him...just him..so to say it wasn't framed due to context is the dumbest argument I've ever heard...had they shown the whole group they couldn't frame him as a coward running away but himself...
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#3,006
#3,006
BowlBrother85 said:
There was an even mixture of law abiding (although, technically trespassing) citizens in the Capitol on 1/6/21 with people who were in the Capitol to raise hell. Nobody has ever said otherwise.
Click to expand...

Im sure we can find posts where you were concerned about trespassing in the summer of 2020.
 
#3,008
#3,008
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Lmao. Keep trying to convince us you know it all & we should believe only in what you bring to the table as being true. Mollie is a very credible person . You just don't like what she says.
Click to expand...
This has nothing to do with me. It concerns whether or not you want to know what the truth is.

Will you please watch the video, which I posted in post # 2,996 of this thread, from the 1:34:40 to the 1:36:49 mark? Adam Kinzinger describes surveillance footage from inside the Capitol on 1/6/21, and then surveillance footage is shown.
 
#3,010
#3,010
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Mollie is a very credible person . You just don't like what she says.
Click to expand...
She is lying her fat butt off when says that the January 6th Committee did not review ANY surveillance footage ... and I can prove it - and just did. If you will watch the video like I said, you will see what I'm talking about.

I can't help but get the feeling that you don't want to know what the truth is.
 
#3,011
#3,011
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
They did ask for it & their request was rejected by democrats .... keep up.
Click to expand...
If that is true his conviction should be thrown out. I'm not sure I believe that. If he did and they denied existence or denied him access someone else should be doing time instead of him IMO.
 
#3,013
#3,013
luthervol said:
Sure it does, because you didn't see him enter through a broken door. You only saw the "peaceful" parts Tucker wished for you to see.
Click to expand...

Regardless of what you believe about him, the prosecution should have made available all of their known footage of him to the defense. That’s our system of law. I’d be shocked if his conviction isn’t vacated, all because of politics.
 
#3,016
#3,016
BowlBrother85 said:
She is lying her fat butt off when says that the January 6th Committee did not review ANY surveillance footage ... and I can prove it - and just did. If you will watch the video like I said, you will see what I'm talking about.

I can't help but get the feeling that you don't want to know what the truth is.
Click to expand...
I watched it and yes he did describe it....so he may have watched it....he may have had an agenda written out and read from that...as well..can you prove that he wasn't reading or following something written...if you can't then Thompson own quote is contrary evidence eve tho he is now back tracking
 
  • Like
Reactions: midnight orange
#3,017
#3,017
KB5252 said:
If that is true his conviction should be thrown out. I'm not sure I believe that. If he did and they denied existence or denied him access someone else should be doing time instead of him IMO.
Click to expand...

Dude's lawyer was on Tucker last night & said they were denied evidence from democrats.
 
Last edited:
#3,020
#3,020
whodeycin85 said:
Context was he was in the back of a group running away....framed as he ran away by himself as a coward....the footage shown by J6 didn't show the dozen or so people ahead of him...just him..so to say it wasn't framed due to context is the dumbest argument I've ever heard...had they shown the whole group they couldn't frame him as a coward running away but himself...
Click to expand...

No, context was he showed solidarity with the morons at the rally and then ran away when they turned violent.
Why run away scared from the very people you just supported. It's his fault. e7f.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#3,021
#3,021
whodeycin85 said:
I watched it and yes he did describe it....so he may have watched it....he may have had an agenda written out and read from that...as well..can you prove that he wasn't reading or following something written...if you can't then Thompson own quote is contrary evidence eve tho he is now back tracking
Click to expand...
If you watched the video then it should be evident that he wasn't reading from anything. He knew what was on the video. It was surveillance footage. You don't want to know what the truth is.

Also, there are probably 30-40 other examples of January 6th Committee members describing surveillance footage just before it was shown. I watched those hearings very closely. I know what the hell I'm talking about on this.
 
#3,022
#3,022
TN Ribs said:
No, context was he showed solidarity with the morons at the rally and then ran away when they turned violent.
Why run away scared from the very people you just supported. It's his fault.
Click to expand...
That wasn't violence. You can call it a protest or even a mostly peaceful angry mob but there's no need to miscategorize it as violent
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#3,023
#3,023
utvolpj said:
That wasn't violence. You can call it a protest or even a mostly peaceful angry mob but there's no need to miscategorize it as violent
Click to expand...
There was tons of violence in the Capitol. What are you talking about? I can provide video, if you try to dispute that.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top