Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#3,076
#3,076
luthervol said:
Better to release it to no one than to one extremely biased source.
Click to expand...

By definition Democrats are a biased source. They have spent yrs politicizing this. Kevin McCarthy is also biased. We've spent yrs hearing the Democrat bias. You can handle a few days of hearing Republican bias
 
#3,078
#3,078
BowlBrother85 said:
Seriously ... why is it so important to you guys that the Capitol breach of 1/6/21 be portrayed as having been mostly peaceful?

It does not bother me in the least when ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter activists, who raid federal buildings, are denounced as thugs and trash ... with their actions described in the harshest terms. It is very odd how personally some of you take this.
Click to expand...
Then the BLM protests was a riot then?

I'm just asking because the left loves to draw a distinction there but will not in the case of Jan 6
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocytop2624
#3,079
#3,079
Thankfully SOH McCarthy is shedding light into the area that is much needed after Pelosi kept darkness present.

1678366784554.jpg

1678366792892.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tman44, DC_Vol, W.TN.Orange Blood and 1 other person
#3,081
#3,081
Words have meaning and insurrection is a very serious word to not take lightly like calling a man a wife beating rapist. But Other countries all they hear is we had a insurrection and that sounds serious and makes us look weak and we are not weak and that was no insurrection on J6. You can't have a insurrection with no guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tman44 and BreatheUT
#3,084
#3,084
luthervol said:
Not surprisingly I see it as the almost complete opposite.

For two years the right wing could only scream about the riots, violence, and lawlessness of BLM protest while ignoring the fact that the vast majority of protests and protestors were 100% peaceful.
The right was in full support of the police and lambasted anyone who spoke against the actions of the police.

Then comes Jan. 6th..................

The right is now screaming that it was mostly peaceful with very little violence and lawlessness.
The right is questioning the actions of the Capital police and the leadership of DC.

Complete 180.........hypocrisy at its finest.
Click to expand...
Of course you do. I'm saying you can't spend years mislabeling your own protests and then turn around and change the definition. You can't attack, insult, cancel, and criminalize half the country and then act surprised when there's blowback.

By your definitions this was just a mostly peaceful protest
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill, OL SMOKEY, rocytop2624 and 1 other person
#3,085
#3,085
Sea Ray said:
By definition Democrats are a biased source. They have spent yrs politicizing this. Kevin McCarthy is also biased. We've spent yrs hearing the Democrat bias. You can handle a few days of hearing Republican bias
Click to expand...
I'll stand by my statement. It was wrong to release it exclusively to Fox.
 
#3,086
#3,086
whodeycin85 said:
If only there has been a committee formed that released all of the footage instead of editing it ...
Click to expand...
You mean like how the repubs released everything from the e-mail investigation into Hillary?
or
How they released everything from the six investigations conducted into the 2012 Benghazi attack by Republican-controlled House committees.

You mean like that????????????????????
 
#3,087
#3,087
luthervol said:
You mean like how the repubs released everything from the e-mail investigation into Hillary?
or
How they released everything from the six investigations conducted into the 2012 Benghazi attack by Republican-controlled House committees.

You mean like that????????????????????
Click to expand...
Yup exactly like that...an they should have..only 1 side is correcting it and it not your side...

So in the 2 examples you provided. Why didn't the Dems release information that would prove the GOP was lying with those investigations???
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#3,090
#3,090
luthervol said:
I'll stand by my statement. It was wrong to release it exclusively to Fox.
Click to expand...

This is America and what makes us great is the free exchange of ideas...exactly what we do on this board. The Jan 6 committee was not a free exchange of ideas. It was overwhelmingly Democrat with a couple token Trump hating Republicans for good measure. Guys like Jim Jordan were refused entry. Therefore it was highly partisan. Now that Republicans have gained control, I'm pleased that they're now putting out their own partisan expose on what happened. We need to hear both sides and then we can sort it out from there. The truth is likely somewhere between the two.

Tucker has clearly pointed out the lie that the Dems and left wing media have told us: that 5 police officers died. If they'll lie about that, what else might they lie about?
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#3,092
#3,092
luthervol said:
I'll stand by my statement. It was wrong to release it exclusively to Fox.
Click to expand...
Every other outlet of significance is committed to the current narrative. They released it to an outlet that has been opposed to that narrative. This is hardly surprising.

The left and it's media partners record on narratives isn't very good. Dissenting voices are a good thing. No matter which side of the isle you lean toward.

The 1/6 commission could have released that info...... But didn't.
 
#3,093
#3,093
BowlBrother85 said:
Serious question :

If he had remained outside of the Capitol, as many protestors did, and simply exercised his right to free speech from there. Would he have been arrested? He was arrested and prosecuted because of poor decisions that he made for himself. Individual accountability.
Click to expand...
He should have been arrested for wearing that outfit in public. Talk about a poor decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
#3,095
#3,095
whodeycin85 said:
Yup exactly like that...an they should have..only 1 side is correcting it and it not your side...

So in the 2 examples you provided. Why didn't the Dems release information that would prove the GOP was lying with those investigations???
Click to expand...
lol....Correcting it? Your side is making it worse.

There was absolutely no reason for the dems to release anything. Every single investigation failed!!!!!!!
Why didn't your side, who had control, release everything to prove her guilt?
Because they had nothing?
 
#3,096
#3,096
BreatheUT said:
So he's pawned off the responsibility to unelected underlings with agendas?
Click to expand...
You think the elected are more qualified than the unelected who are picked for their specific skills? Interesting, I'll remember that.

BREAKING>>>>>>>>BreatheUT considers the elected to be the most qualified.
 
#3,097
#3,097
luthervol said:
You think the elected are more qualified than the unelected who are picked for their specific skills? Interesting, I'll remember that.

BREAKING>>>>>>>>BreatheUT considers the elected to be the most qualified.
Click to expand...

No, I'm saying obviously the azzhat apparently can't control his staff since they presented him with garbage.
 
Last edited:
#3,098
#3,098
Sea Ray said:
This is America and what makes us great is the free exchange of ideas...exactly what we do on this board. The Jan 6 committee was not a free exchange of ideas. It was overwhelmingly Democrat with a couple token Trump hating Republicans for good measure. Guys like Jim Jordan were refused entry. Therefore it was highly partisan. Now that Republicans have gained control, I'm pleased that they're now putting out their own partisan expose on what happened. We need to hear both sides and then we can sort it out from there. The truth is likely somewhere between the two.

Tucker has clearly pointed out the lie that the Dems and left wing media have told us: that 5 police officers died. If they'll lie about that, what else might they lie about?
Click to expand...
They kept the nuts like Jim Jordan off specifically because he is blindly partisan. They provided a long list of republicans who would be welcomed. The republicans refused simply to reserve the right to scream "partisan".
I think that is actually a pretty good idea moving forward. The party in power can keep 5 of the most partisan from the other side off of an investigative committee, but must also provide a list of 50 from the other party they would welcome on the committee.

You surely aren't claiming that all republicans other than the Jordan's and MTG's were partisan. (that may tell you something about your perspective)
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top