Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#3,101
#3,101
luthervol said:
lol....Correcting it? Your side is making it worse.

There was absolutely no reason for the dems to release anything. Every single investigation failed!!!!!!!
Why didn't your side, who had control, release everything to prove her guilt?
Because they had nothing?
Click to expand...
All those committees fail....they should have released everything....just as they should not and seems to be doing so.....s they are correcting their current mistake and releasing everything. As they should..if that makes the situation worse that's make no sense
 
#3,102
#3,102
luthervol said:
They kept the nuts like Jim Jordan off specifically because he is blindly partisan. They provided a long list of republicans who would be welcomed. The republicans refused simply to reserve the right to scream "partisan".
I think that is actually a pretty good idea moving forward. The party in power can keep 5 of the most partisan from the other side off of an investigative committee, but must also provide a list of 50 from the other party they would welcome on the committee.

You surely aren't claiming that all republicans other than the Jordan's and MTG's were partisan. (that may tell you something about your perspective)
Click to expand...

Are you telling me that the Dems on that committee weren't partisan? Sure Jim Jordan is partisan. No doubt about it. You don't think Adam Schiff is partisan? C'mon now. If Schiff is on there, Republicans deserve to balance that with Jordan
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#3,103
#3,103
Sea Ray said:
Are you telling me that the Dems on that committee weren't partisan? Sure Jim Jordan is partisan. No doubt about it. You don't think Adam Schiff is partisan? C'mon now. If Schiff is on there, Republicans deserve to balance that with Jordan
Click to expand...
Schiff is on there because they controlled the house. The party in control can put whomever they deem best. I'm saying the party in control should be allowed to keep the most insanely partisan from the opposing side off of the committee. Maybe that would be a little incentive for people not to be insanely partisan.

As I've said hundreds of times.....EVERYONE IS PARTISAN JUST NOT EQUALLY SO.

Maybe this should also be a new rule.
Each party picks ten members from the opposing party who will then ranks every member of the opposing party from most to least partisan.
Make the list public....it would be fascinating. And everyone would know that if you are ranked among the most partisan you will not get any key roles when the other party is in power.
If you are ranked one of the least partisan, you will get all of the key roles when the opposing party is in power.

Anything that leads to less partisanship and more working together is what I'm for.
 
#3,104
#3,104
luthervol said:
They kept the nuts like Jim Jordan off specifically because he is blindly partisan. They provided a long list of republicans who would be welcomed. The republicans refused simply to reserve the right to scream "partisan".
I think that is actually a pretty good idea moving forward. The party in power can keep 5 of the most partisan from the other side off of an investigative committee, but must also provide a list of 50 from the other party they would welcome on the committee.

You surely aren't claiming that all republicans other than the Jordan's and MTG's were partisan. (that may tell you something about your perspective)
Click to expand...

Take a break man. You're trying to keep hope alive that this was anything but a kangaroo court the last two years. It's been exposed. It's over. Just enjoy the video evidence like the rest of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sea Ray, Franklin Pierce and W.TN.Orange Blood
#3,105
#3,105
Lol...Google Tucker Carlson and all the left's top hit pieces are all you will see. They are billowing the same talking points - "what Tucker said about Trump". It's the same talking points BB85 uses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol and whodeycin85
#3,106
#3,106
BreatheUT said:
Take a break man. You're trying to keep hope alive that this was anything but a kangaroo court the last two years. It's been exposed. It's over. Just enjoy the video evidence like the rest of us.
Click to expand...
lol....On the kangaroo court continuum, this falls behind multiple republican led investigations over the past 30 years.

But I'm now suggesting ways to make it less partisan moving forward no matter who is in power.
 
#3,107
#3,107
luthervol said:
lol....On the kangaroo court continuum, this falls behind multiple republican led investigations over the past 30 years.

But I'm now suggesting ways to make it less partisan moving forward no matter who is in power.
Click to expand...

Why don't you get ahead of this instead of being reactive once progressives plans have been foiled?
 
#3,110
#3,110
BreatheUT said:
Lol...Google Tucker Carlson and all the left's top hit pieces are all you will see. They are billowing the same talking points - "what Tucker said about Trump". It's the same talking points BB85 uses.
Click to expand...
Well he did say he hates Trump, he knows the election wasn't stolen, nothing good came from Trump's 4 years, his audience is basically a bunch of idiots who do not want real news, and he has to keep the lies going in order to maintain ratings.

But you guys love him. I wish there was some way y'all could process how sadly insane it makes you appear to reasonable people.
 
#3,111
#3,111
luthervol said:
Well he did say he hates Trump, he knows the election wasn't stolen, nothing good came from Trump's 4 years, his audience is basically a bunch of idiots who do not want real news, and he has to keep the lies going in order to maintain ratings.

But you guys love him. I wish there was some way y'all could process how sadly insane it makes you appear to reasonable people.
Click to expand...

On the pragmatic continuum democrats play in the kiddy pool by comparison.
 
#3,115
#3,115
luthervol said:
lol....Pragmatism and Fox viewership are about as diametrically opposite as possible.
Click to expand...

There is a reason democrats are called bleeding hearts. If feelings solved problems American democrats would solve world poverty but we'd still have the homeless in America because your party has given up on it.
 
#3,116
#3,116
BreatheUT said:
There is a reason democrats are called bleeding hearts. If feelings solved problems American democrats would solve world poverty but we'd still have the homeless in America because your party has given up on it.
Click to expand...
That's once again hysterical.
The recordings were released exclusively to Fox for one simple reason: feelings.

There is no logical reason for having not released the recordings to all media at the same time.

Trumpism was built on feelings....Bannon, Stone knew that was the way to control a particular sub-group.
Fox's success is due to nothing more than feelings.

If dems are bleeding hearts, I guess repubs are broken hearts.
 
#3,120
#3,120
Almost 30 minutes before another Tucker Carlson show comes on.

Luther & BB85 should be in anticipation mode for another great show of Dem lies.
 
#3,124
#3,124
hog88 said:
I know without a doubt who’s side BB, Luther, LG and some others would have been on in 1776.
Click to expand...
"It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, 825VOL, luthervol and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top