Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#3,151
#3,151
volfanhill said:
Triggered by nothing. Just pointing out the facts. Side note he's openly admitted to lying to you. How do you know he didn't manipulate the videos he's showing you? That's the thing with integrity. Once you blow it it's gone. But please keep eating at his trough of feeding those he knows he can fool. Even funnier he can be exposed and you all are still cheering him on. Makes you look even dumber. Worse than a Lemon supporter even. Embarrassing.
Click to expand...

You know, that's a great point. The government used these same videos (maybe different cuts) to prosecute people. Maybe they were manipulated too? Heck, why use video evidence at all anymore since it can be so easily manipulated? The dude shooting someone on video in the convenience store may have just been manipulated, right? Can't bust him for murder. We know the left manipulated the video of Josh Hawley running for his life....saying he was a coward. When the full video was shown you can clearly see that many other Senators ran out before him and he was a the back of the pack. See how that works?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#3,152
#3,152
norrislakevol said:
You know, that's a great point. The government used these same videos (maybe different cuts) to prosecute people. Maybe they were manipulated too? Heck, why use video evidence at all anymore since it can be so easily manipulated? The dude shooting someone on video in the convenience store may have just been manipulated, right? Can't bust him for murder. We know the left manipulated the video of Josh Hawley running for his life....saying he was a coward. When the full video was shown you can clearly see that many other Senators ran out before him and he was a the back of the pack. See how that works?
Click to expand...
I have never claimed the government didn't do that. That's the difference between me and you. I have zero doubt they are both clowns.
 
#3,154
#3,154
volfanhill said:
No I don't trust politicians. But you have proof of Tucker treating his viewers like morons. And his viewers are doubling down. It's super funny. How dumb can they be.? Guy admits to having a different position than what he puts on tv. There can be no debate on that. And his viewers are more concerned with defending him then realizing he thinks you are dumb. And treats you as such
Click to expand...
He treats me like nothing. I've seen maybe a piece or two of his monologues ever, can't stand network news.

I browse FOX, CNN and BBC websites daily for the news though. I prefer to read from multiple perspectives, read and re read some of the wording to navigate the slants and form my own opinion.
 
#3,158
#3,158
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
It's what's been said before many times over & I also heard the same thing the other day.
Of course, you'll call it a lie as you always think it is. That's what you do. LOL ... the AP has been paid off to say she didn't do so to make democrats look like little angels. Democrats have news organizations in their back pocket to keep them innocent of all the corruption they do in the shadows.
Click to expand...
That is ridiculous .... as if it's only the AP who has de-bunked that claim ... Do you ever say anything which can be proven accurate? All you do is propagate falsehoods. You are gullible and dimwitted.
 
#3,159
#3,159
Orangeburst said:
I bet you they never did personally review it. They dont even read their own 5K page Bills from Hell
Click to expand...
You obviously didn't watch the hearings. You don't want to know what the truth is. The January 6th Committee not only showed surveillance footage throughout those hearings, they described what was about to be shown beforehand. I have posted numerous examples of that. You are willfully ignorant. You don't want to know what the facts are. You have an inner need to believe your lies ... and so nothing that runs counter to your belief system is even considered.

That is how an uneducated, narrow-minded person goes through life. You live in a vacuum of misinformation where everything conforms to your simple-minded views. It's pathetic and sad.
 
#3,160
#3,160
BowlBrother85 said:
You obviously didn't watch the hearings. You don't want to know what the truth is. The January 6th Committee not only showed surveillance footage throughout those hearings, they described what was about to be shown beforehand. I have posted numerous examples of that. You are willfully ignorant. You don't want to know what the facts are. You have an inner need to believe your lies ... and so nothing that runs counter to your belief system is even considered.

That is how an uneducated, narrow-minded person goes through life. You live in a vacuum of misinformation where everything conforms to your simple-minded views. It's pathetic and sad.
Click to expand...

Says someone who watched the J6 hearings. Now that is PATHETIC and someone without a life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, WeeohdeeWood, VOLS INC. and 1 other person
#3,161
#3,161
BowlBrother85 said:
You obviously didn't watch the hearings. You don't want to know what the truth is. The January 6th Committee not only showed surveillance footage throughout those hearings, they described what was about to be shown beforehand. I have posted numerous examples of that. You are willfully ignorant. You don't want to know what the facts are. You have an inner need to believe your lies ... and so nothing that runs counter to your belief system is even considered.

That is how an uneducated, narrow-minded person goes through life. You live in a vacuum of misinformation where everything conforms to your simple-minded views. It's pathetic and sad.
Click to expand...
All your link prove is that they may have watched deceptively edited parts of the footage and spoke on them. Now are you saying they watched it all and knowingly left out footage due to their need to make Trump look bad...it so. That's worse they not watching at all....
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#3,162
#3,162
whodeycin85 said:
All your link prove is that they may have watched deceptively edited parts of the footage and spoke on them. Now are you saying they watched it all and knowingly left out footage due to their need to make Trump look bad...it so. That's worse they not watching at all....
Click to expand...
I do not believe for one minute that you watched any portion of those hearings. The committee members walked the audience through surveillance footage in every session, which demonstrated a command of what they were watching.
 
#3,164
#3,164
BowlBrother85 said:
I do not believe for one minute that you watched any portion of those hearings. The committee members walked the audience through surveillance footage in every session, which demonstrated a command of what they were watching.
Click to expand...
Which was edited footage correct,?
Btw Thompson said to CNN they didn't have access... So who is correct you or him?
 
Last edited:
#3,167
#3,167
luthervol said:
Here is your analogy.

It's like if the FBI exclusively released selected information to CNBC, and CNBC went through the information and made public the information of their choosing.

How would that have gone over with you guys?

Would we be better off under that scenario?
Click to expand...
That's exactly what occurred.
 
#3,168
#3,168
InVOLuntary said:
That's exactly what occurred.
Click to expand...
No it's not.

But for the sake of the debate, let's say that is what occurred.
Do you think that was the right thing for the FBI to do?
Do you think the country benefited from the FBI doing that?
Do you think that should be the policy moving forward?
Do you think it would have been better had the FBI released things equally to all sources?
Do you think it would have been better for the FBI to have released nothing rather than selected information to selected media sources?
 
#3,169
#3,169
luthervol said:
No it's not.

But for the sake of the debate, let's say that is what occurred.
Do you think that was the right thing for the FBI to do?
Do you think the country benefited from the FBI doing that?
Do you think that should be the policy moving forward?
Do you think it would have been better had the FBI released things equally to all sources?
Do you think it would have been better for the FBI to have released nothing rather than selected information to selected media sources?
Click to expand...
Did the government release select video to your state run media (CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC) and omit exculpatory video? It's a simple question. The answer is yes.
 
#3,171
#3,171
luthervol said:
Schiff is on there because they controlled the house. The party in control can put whomever they deem best. I'm saying the party in control should be allowed to keep the most insanely partisan from the opposing side off of the committee. Maybe that would be a little incentive for people not to be insanely partisan.

As I've said hundreds of times.....EVERYONE IS PARTISAN JUST NOT EQUALLY SO.

Maybe this should also be a new rule.
Each party picks ten members from the opposing party who will then ranks every member of the opposing party from most to least partisan.
Make the list public....it would be fascinating. And everyone would know that if you are ranked among the most partisan you will not get any key roles when the other party is in power.
If you are ranked one of the least partisan, you will get all of the key roles when the opposing party is in power.

Anything that leads to less partisanship and more working together is what I'm for.
Click to expand...

Your post amounts to an admission that this was a partisan committee because the party in power can do it. OK. I think that's a problem and I pointed this out so succinctly, you admitted as much
 
#3,172
#3,172
whodeycin85 said:
All your link prove is that they may have watched deceptively edited parts of the footage and spoke on them. Now are you saying they watched it all and knowingly left out footage due to their need to make Trump look bad...it so. That's worse they not watching at all....
Click to expand...
Media manipulation by the left being exposed.
 
#3,174
#3,174
luthervol said:
That's once again hysterical.
The recordings were released exclusively to Fox for one simple reason: feelings.

There is no logical reason for having not released the recordings to all media at the same time.

Trumpism was built on feelings....Bannon, Stone knew that was the way to control a particular sub-group.
Fox's success is due to nothing more than feelings.

If dems are bleeding hearts, I guess repubs are broken hearts.
Click to expand...

Broken hearts? That is not even on the continuum unless you are admitting a pragmatist place facts above feelings. American marxism has taken over the democrat party minds.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top